100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

Topic The Language of Strategic Communication

Beoordeling
3,0
(2)
Verkocht
9
Pagina's
22
Geüpload op
18-06-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

In this document you can find a resume of all the lectures of the course "Topic The Language of Strategic Communication" for the school year 2023/2024 with the models and theories discussed in class :)











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
18 juni 2024
Aantal pagina's
22
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Christian burgers
Bevat
Alle colleges

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Strategic communication

LECTURE 1 Course introduction

Strategic communication
 Often seen as war or a game most negative context  but not always true
 Strategic fist used in 1950s in relation to organizations
 Term originates from Greek for generalship
 Negative associations

Classic prospective (Rational decision making)
 SWOT: Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat
 Strategic communication seen as a rational decision-making
 Determining the best strategy for the organization b< conducting a SWOT analysis
 Strengthens a negative perspective on strategic communication something only for the boss/manager

Contemporary prospective
 Not only responsibility of management
 Everybody in organizations is responsible for strategic communication
 Found in specific areas:
 Change organizational change, smaller changes (how teams operate..)
 Inherent part of organization’s culture: inspires and reflects strategic communication
 How an organization is embedded in society is very important
 How do they function in society?
 Different from first perspective: only focus on their goals (how they can serve themselves, instead of their
society)
 No just a document, but seen in day-today practice
 Everybody contributes (es helpdesk employee)

Definition of strategic communication (Hallahn et.al 2007)
 communicating purposefully to advance the mission of an organization
 Hallahn (2004) 6 different specialties
 Management communication facilitate orderly operations of organization
 Marketing communication create awareness and promote sales
 Public relations establish and maintain beneficial relationships with key constituencies
 Technical communication educate employers/consumers to improve efficiency
 Political communication build political consensus or consent on important issues
 Information/social marketing communication reduce incidence of risky behavior

 Disappearance of traditional boundaries integrated marketing communication
 strategic communication isn’t the same:
 more purposeful, focus on presentation and promotion of organization through intentional activities of
leaders, employees and communication practitioners

 Why use term strategic communication?
 The ability of communicators to differentiate between traditional communication activities and their effects is
rapidly disappearing
 Important changes in public communication are driven by technology and media economics
 Organizations use an expanding variety of methods to influence the behavior of their constituencies (not
isolated integrative)
 Strategic communication recognizes that purposeful influence is the fundamental goal of communications by
organizations




Interdisciplinary (Werder et al., 2018) connected to a lot of other things, not only comm. Science

, Communication science
 Organization science
 Marketing
 Cognitive psychology
 Social psychology
 Linguistics
 Philosophy

5 Military strategies from Sun Tzu that can be applied in a business setting, according to Forbes: (articles “5 ChatGPT
Prompts to apply the art of war to your business”)
 Know yourself and your enemy
 strategic positioning and timing
 Adopt a more flexible strategy (es if things go wrong)
 Incorporate deception
 Lead by example

Strategic communication
 Other classic definition related to games
 Winners and losers
 Dog-eat-god world one organization win aginst others org.

Winners and losers
 Narrative perpetuated in the media
 Dutch newspaper “De Volkskrant” has a weekly column mentioning the organizational winner and loser of the past
week (es this year Elon mask)

Strategic communication
 Classic perspective Asymmetrical
 Top-down communication
 From manager to employee

Transmission model
 Classic perspective on communication
 Sender-receiver model
 Get information from here to there (the the audience)

Strategic communication
 New perspective Strategic communication at every level in the organization (not just managerial level)
 ES:
 Social media  if u go on social media and they talk about organization and the audience get positive
thoughts, the social media account that is managed by employees)
 Response to negative comments by clients (employees response and everyone can see it)
 Jumbo radio professional dj and ask employees to call and talk about their experiences working

Organizations and societal issues
 Organizations need to communicate specific societal issues  Otherwise could be as a very specific stand to u take
on this problem

Strategic communication is about changes
 Strategic communication is about culture how the org. responds and use communications
 Strategic communication is about practice and how they act

, Ritual model of communication
 Interactive perspective on communication
 Communication as symbolic process in which reality is created, maintained, repaired and transforms by
communication
 Emphasis on meaning

Strategic communication
 “communicating purposefully to advance the mission of an organization” (Hallahan et al., 2007)
 “The practice of deliberate and purposive communication that a communication agent enacts in the public sphere
on behalf of a communication entity to reach set goals” (Holtzhausen and Zerfass, 2013)


Professional communication field (NL)
 BNP model (profiles of different levels of the job)
 Communication jobs in the professional fields can be divided based on:
 Job level
 Based on seniority on the position and field
 The highest the level the more responsibilities
 Distribution of one or more of six core tasks
 Training Making individuals more communicative in order for the organization to get to a higher level (es
giving feedbacks to improve)
 organizing  make sure that people can communicate/interact in some ways (es taking care of meetings)
 Analyzing  mapping important issues (group dynamics that break down: stereotyping and group thinking)
 Integrating  Planning, adjusting and implementing communication porcess
 Creating  creating communication material
 Advising advice and strategies for other communication (making organization more communicative)
 For all core tasks Language is important  focus of this course

 Different kinds of communication:
 Interpersonal communication
 Group communication
 Communication at organizational level

LECTURE 2  Training

 Training = making individuals within an organization more communicative
 A as communication person when engaging with training help others to be more communicative

Organizational dilemma interpersonal communication
 how should you communicate within a meeting?
 How can you best formulate your critique?

Conversational implicatures
Pragmatics how context contributes to meaning
 Subfield of linguistics
 Words can have different meanings in different contexts
 Orange color, fruit, Dutch royal family/football team

Speech acts  when we look at the statement we ca look at them with 3 different prespectives
 Locutionary act  what was said focused on specific words used in specific context
 question, statement

 Illocution  communicative goal that the speaker wish to archive using that communication es indirect language
 information, action
Types of illocutionary acts:
 Assertive: committing a speaker to the truth of a proposition

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 2 reviews worden weergegeven
10 maanden geleden

11 maanden geleden

3,0

2 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
annastampanoni Universiteit van Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
28
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
1
Documenten
3
Laatst verkocht
5 maanden geleden

3,8

4 beoordelingen

5
2
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen