100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

GUIDELINES for Psychological Assessment

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
35
Geüpload op
13-05-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Statement Distinguishing Between Guidelines and Standards The term guidelines refers to statements that suggest or recommend specific professional behavior, endeavor, or conduct for psychologists. Guidelines differ from standards. Standards are mandatory and thus may be accompanied by an enforcement mechanism (e.g., the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct; APA, 2017a). By contrast, guidelines are aspirational in intent; they are not mandatory, definitive, or exhaustive. They aim to facilitate the continued systematic development of the professional and to promote a high level of professional practice by psychologists. A set of guidelines may not apply to every professional and clinical situation within the scope of that set. As a result, guidelines are not intended to take precedence over the professional judgments of psychologists that are based on the scientific and professional knowledge of the field and the ethics code. Further, federal and state laws also supersede guidelines. These guidelines are professional practice guidelines that are applied to the practice of psychology and not to specific treatments that may be used in the practice of psychology. Professional practice guidelines are directed to practitioners and are intended to provide aspirational guidance in ethical and professional decisionmaking in professional practice. Compatibility With APA Ethics Code These guidelines are consistent with the current APA Ethics Code (APA, 2017a). The guidelines are also consistent with and acknowledge other relevant APA policy such as the Standards of Accreditation for Health Service Psychology (APA, Commission on Accreditation, 2015), the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Educational Research Association [AERA] et al., 2014), and the Professional Practice Guidelines: Guidance for Developers and Users (APA, 2015b). Definition of Terms ASSESSMENT QUALIFICATIONS The term assessment qualifications refers to the combination of knowledge, skills, abilities, training, experience, and practice credentials that are deemed desirable for the use of psychological tests and assessment materials. However, the term describes two types of qualifications: (a) generic assessment knowledge and skills necessary for typical uses of tests and (b) specific qualification for the responsible use of tests in specific settings and for specific purposes (APA, 2001). ASSESSMENT The term assessment refers to a complex activity integrating knowledge, clinical judgment, reliable collateral information (e.g., observation, semistructured or structured interviews, third-party report), and psychometric constructs with expertise in an area of professional practice or application. Psychological assessment is a problem-solving process of identifying and using relevant information about individuals, groups, or institutions for the purpose of decisionmaking and recommendations (APA, 2001). This includes sensitivity toward the inclusion of diverse and underserved populations. EVALUATION Although the terms evaluation and assessment are often used interchangeably, evaluation is a component and often end product of the assessment process. PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING Psychological tests are defined as any psychometrically derived measurement instrument that assesses the psychological constructs in which a structured sample of an examinee’s behavior in a specified domain is obtained and subsequently quantified, scored, interpreted, and synthesized using a standardized process for the purpose of evaluative conclusion or recommendation (AERA et al., 2014). According to these AERA, APA, and National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) standards, although tests may differ vastly in terms of item and presentation design, response format, and purpose, the commonality across all test instruments is that the process by which the subject’s responses are evaluated and scored is standardized. In addition, other instruments that can be included in psychological assessment protocols where subject responses are aggregated and scored in a standardized fashion, such as structured diagnostic interviewing systems (e.g., Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Clinician Version; First et al., 2016) and/or structured life history (i.e., biodata; Oswald et al., 2004) inventories and other job performance prediction instruments (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998) developed using psychological assessment principles and used with concurrent declarations of generalized predictive utility in similar settings, also fall within the purview of the AERA/APA/NCME standards. Documentation of Need/Public Benefit AVOIDANCE OF HARM Psychological testing, assessment, and evaluation is a core component of psychological practice, treatment planning, and subsequent decisions regarding those served. Psychologists are guided by professional standards of practice in engaging in psychological testing, assessment, and evaluation to be compliant with competency expectations and to avoid harm to clients. Guidelines for psychological assessment and evaluation are important for use by psychologists to aspire to fair, respectful, and competent service delivery and treatment of examinees. EMERGING UNDERSERVED OR VULNERABLE CLIENT POPULATIONS The population served by psychologists continues to reflect the shift of focus to underserved, rural, older adult, immigrant and refugee, and other vulnerable populations. Ongoing research and empirical evidence support the need to recognize culture, language, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, disability, and other forms of human diversity in decisions regarding service delivery. Several factors contribute to one’s ability to conduct an assessment, formulate differential diagnoses, and develop contextually and culturally relevant treatment recommendations: choice of test instruments, relative weight of multiple data points, and contextual factors relevant to decision-making all must be considered when assessing the increasingly diverse population that psychologists serve. Guidelines are important in identifying expectations for competent service to varied populations

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

GUIDELINES
for Psychological Assessment

,Copyright © 2020 by the American Psychological Association. This material may be reproduced and distributed without permission provided that
acknowledgment is given to the American Psychological Association. This material may not be reprinted, translated, or distributed electronically without
prior permission in writing from the publisher. For permission, contact APA, Rights and Permissions, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242.

This document will expire as APA policy in 10 years (2030). Correspondence regarding the APA Guidelines for Psychological Assessment and Evaluation
should be addressed to the American Psychological Association, 750 First Street, NE, Washington, 20002-4242.

Suggested Citation
American Psychological Association, APA Task Force on Psychological Assessment and Evaluation Guidelines. (2020). APA Guidelines for Psychological
Assessment and Evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-psychological-assessment-evaluation.pdf



II APA | Guidelines for Psychological Assessment and Evaluation

,APA GUIDELINES
for Psychological Assessment Task Force Workgroup

and Evaluation Linda F. Campbell, PhD (co-chair)
Michael J. Cuttler, PhD,
ABPP
University of Georgia Law Enforcement
Services, Inc.

APA TASK FORCE ON PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AND Lisa D. Stanford, PhD, ABPP (co-chair)
Stephen T. DeMers, EdD
EVALUATION GUIDELINES Akron Children’s Hospital
University of Kentucky
APPROVED BY APA COUNCIL OF REPRESENTATIVES MARCH 2020
Vincent C. Alfonso, PhD Giselle
A. Hass, PsyD, ABAP
Gonzaga University, School of
Education Independent Practice
APA Staff
Catherine L. Grus, PhD
Chief Education Officer Education
Directorate
C. Vaile Wright, PhD
Senior Director, Health Care Innovation
Practice Directorate


AUTHOR’S NOTE
This document was developed by representatives from the Board of Professional Affairs, the
Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment, the Committee for the Advancement of
Professional Psychology, the Committee on Professional Practice and Standards, the
Board of Educational Affairs, and the Association of State and Provincial Psychology
Boards in collaboration with APA staff. The work group included Vincent C. Alfonso,
PhD; Linda F. Campbell, PhD (co-chair); Michael J. Cuttler, PhD, ABPP; Stephen T.
DeMers, EdD; Giselle A. Hass, PsyD,
ABAP; Lisa D. Stanford, PhD, ABPP (co-chair); and APA staff members Catherine L. Grus,
PhD, and C. Vaile Wright, PhD.
The work group also acknowledges the earlier contributions from April Harris-
Britt, PhD, representing the Board for the Advancement of Psychology in the Public
Interest, and several members of CPTA who made substantive contributions to
Guideline 5. The work group extends its appreciation to the APA staff members who
facilitated the work of the guideline, including Marianne Ernesto, Mary G. Hardiman,
MS, and Sarah A. Rose..

,

Geschreven voor

Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
13 mei 2024
Aantal pagina's
35
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
N/a
Bevat
Alle colleges

Onderwerpen

€7,63
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
antonysila275

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
antonysila275 Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
-
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
224
Laatst verkocht
-
LEARNING CENTRE.

EXAMS, SUMMARY , NOTES QUESTION AND ANSWERS.

0,0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen