100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Research Methods Complete Revision Notes (Psychology AQA A-Level)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
28
Geüpload op
16-04-2024
Geschreven in
2022/2023

Complete Research Methods revision notes for AQA Psychology A-Level, written by a straight A* student. Includes PEEL paragraphs for every topic and diagrams where needed. Well organised and in order. Includes collated information from class, textbooks and online. Topics include: Scientific processes, Experimental Designs, Sampling, Types of Experiment, Self-report techniques, Interviews, Observational techniques and design, Ethics, Case Studies, The role of peer review in the scientific process, Implications of research for the economy, Reliability and Validity, Features of science, Reporting psychological investigations, Data handling and analysis, Qualitative and quantitative data, Primary and secondary data, Descriptive statistics, Presentation and display of quantitative data, Distributions and Correlations, Level of measurement, Content analysis and coding, Inferential testing, Factors affecting the choice of statistical test, Probability and significance, Introduction to statistical testing. All other topic revision notes are also uploaded on my page as well as packages at a discounted price.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Research Methods


Research Methods
Scienti c processes
Aims and Hypotheses
Aim: A general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate (purpose of study).

Hypothesis: A clear, precise, testable statement that states what the researcher believes
to be true in relation to the variables.

Directional hypothesis (one-tailed): States the kind of di erence or relationship between
the two conditions being investigated (higher or lower, faster or slower).

Non-directional hypothesis (two-tailed): States that there is a di erence or relationship
between the two conditions but doesn’t state the direction of it

Null hypothesis: An assumption that there is no relationship or di erence between the two
variables being investigated

Things to remember
‣ Both sides of the IV should be considered (having a training partner and training alone)
‣ The DV should be mentioned (motivation levels)
‣ The DV and sometimes IV should be operationalised (motivation questionnaire scores)

Variables
Independent variable: The variable that is manipulated by the researcher.

Dependant variable: The variable that is observed or measured by the researcher.

Operationalised variables: Clearly de ning variables in terms of how they are measured.


Always mention cause and e ect - how change of the IV had an e ect on the DV



Experimental group/condition: The group that receives the variable being tested.

Control group/condition: The baseline condition that doesn’t receive the variable being
tested - used to see if the variable actually has an a ect on behaviour.

Control of variables
Extraneous variables: Any variable other than the IV that may a ect the DV if not
controlled.

Confounding variables: Any variable other than the IV that may have a ected the DV after
the study has taken place.
‣ Extraneous variables can be controlled for, however, confounding variables cannot.
Page 1 of 28 A Level Psychology Paper 2


fi ff fi ff ff ffff ffff ff

, Research Methods
There are 3 key variables that you should control when doing an experiment:
Participant variables – minimising di erences between participants (e.g. their stage of
development such as age, or ability such as IQ).

Researcher variables – factors such as researcher behaviour, appearance or gender could
a ect participant responses, so should be made consistent throughout the experiment.

Situational variables – control of the setting where the experiment takes place, such as
keeping light, sound and temperature levels consistent.


Extraneous Variables
Demand characteristics: Any cue from the researcher that may be interpreted by the
participant as revealing the purpose of the investigation. Leading to a participant
changing their behaviour within the research situation.

Please-U e ect
‣ People may act in a way they think is expected or over perform to please the
experimenter.
Screw-U e ect
‣ People may deliberately under perform to sabotage results of the study.
Investigator e ects: Unwanted in uence (conscious or unconscious) of the investigator on
the research outcome

Dealing with Extraneous Variables
Single blind method: Where the participant doesn’t know the true aim of the experiment
or doesn’t know they’re part of the experiment (raises ethical implications).

Double blind method: Both the participant and the investigator are blind to the aims - the
investigator cannot give cues.

Standardisation: Using exactly the same formalised procedures and environment for the
study so that extraneous variables are reduced

Randomisation: The use of chance when deciding the conditions and participants of the
study to control e ects of bias.


Pilot studies
De nition: Small scale trial of methods.

Aim
‣ To identify and modify issues in aspects of design before the real go such as ambiguity
in instructions, questions, behavioural categories
‣ To save time and money
‣ Used to train investigators or observers




Page 2 of 28 A Level Psychology Paper 2


ff fi ffff ff ff fl ff

, Research Methods

Experimental Designs
Experimental design: The different ways in which the testing or participants can be
organised in relation to the experimental conditions.

Independent Groups Design
Where participants are allocated to di erent groups where each group
represents one experimental condition.
Strengths Weaknesses

‣ No order e ects ‣ Larger sample size needed as each participant only does one condition
‣ Prepare to spend time and money
‣ Reduction in demand ‣ Participant variables might a ect the DV
characteristics ‣ Random allocation

Repeated Measures Design
Where the same participants are allocated to all groups (i.e. take part in all
conditions) of an experiment.
Strengths Weaknesses

‣ Smaller sample size ‣ Order e ects (practice/boredom/fatigue e ect) might in uence the DV -
needed as each confounding variable
participant completes 1. Counterbalancing
both condition 2. Appropriate interval
3. Ensure the tasks set are of equal di culty

‣ Participant variables ‣ Greater chance of demand characteristics
are controlled ‣ Use the single-blind method
‣ The conditions will di er slightly due to the 2 di erent levels of the IV
‣ Standardisation

Matched Pairs Design
Where pairs of participants are rst matched on key variables that may a ect the DV.
Then one member of the pair is assigned to Condition A and the other to Condition B.

Strengths Weaknesses

‣ No order e ects ‣ Its never fully possible to eliminate all participant variables and not
always clear which are the important ones

‣ Reduction in demand ‣ Conduct a pilot study (a mini-trial study) to condor what the key
characteristics variables might be

‣ Participant variables are reduced ‣ Its time consuming and expensive to match key variables as pre-
(more than with independant assessments are required
groups) ‣ Restrict the number of matching variables to make it easier

Random allocation: Controlling for participant variables to ensure that each participant
has the same chance of being in any condition.

Order e ects (practice/boredom/fatigue e ect): A confounding variable arising from the
order in which conditions are presented.

Page 3 of 28 A Level Psychology Paper 2



ff ffff ff ff ffi fi ff ff ff ff fl ff

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Nee
Wat is er van het boek samengevat?
Research methods
Geüpload op
16 april 2024
Aantal pagina's
28
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

€17,24
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
izzyjohns1 Kings College London
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
32
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
8
Documenten
72
Laatst verkocht
3 dagen geleden

4,0

4 beoordelingen

5
1
4
2
3
1
2
0
1
0

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen