100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary of readings for Qualitative research methods - grade 9.5

Beoordeling
1,0
(1)
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
15
Geüpload op
03-04-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Summary of all required readings for QRM. The numbering of the lectures might differ a bit because we had some schedule changes but all topics are included :)










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
3 april 2024
Aantal pagina's
15
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Lecture 1 - Quant. & Qual Research; Positivist & Interpretive Research
Brady: Data-Set Observations vs. Causal-Process Observations: The 2000 US
Pres. Election
- Data-Set Observations: standard regression analysis
- Causal-Process Observations: diagnostic “nuggets” of data that make a strong contribution
to causal inference, uses process tracing (seeks to establish the "physical and social
processes through which purported causes affect outcomes"
- researchers oriented toward the use of causal-process observations would ask whether the
result makes any sense
- Investigating causal processes in close detail to see if the posited causal effect is probable


Goertz, Gary, Mahoney. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative
Research in the Social Sciences, Introduction
- qualitative research set apart from quantitative by (1) within-case analysis, such as process
tracing (stats cross-case analysis), (2) logic and set theory, which informs all major qual.
techniques (using logic to formulate theories and conceptualization (vs. stats))
- number of N is correlated with type of research but does not define it, not just “numbers vs.
words”


Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine, Yanow: Interpretive Research Design. Concepts and
Processes
- distinction between methodology and methods; methodology= presuppositions concerning
ontology and epistemology informing a set of methods
- distinction between quant., qual. And interpretative research


The Politics of Deliberation: Qāt Chews as Public Spheres in Yemen
- minimalist definition of democracy (solely based on contested elections) needs revision
- Habermasian “public sphere” theory: public sphere activities work politically.

, - everyday practices of political contestation outside of electoral channels confound aspects
of both the minimalist and the Habermasian frameworks
- problem with binary classification of regime
- “Rather, I argue that there are different sites for enacting democracy, and a robust
democracy needs to be using them all. Thus, a consideration of democracy also requires
theorizing about aspects of substantive representation that are evident in Yemen, namely,
the widespread, inclusive mobilization of critical, practical discourses in which people
articulate and think through their moral and material demands in public” (p. 63)
- Yemen employs more democratic practices/citizen influence than other countries in the
Middle East ➜ shift attention away from formal considerations of electoral outcomes to
other dimensions of participatory politics
- Qāt Chews: open to public, political in four senses:
➜ policy decisions are made, people make use of them to share information about political
events, they are a forum of negotiating power relationships between elites and
constituencies, public participating is not just social category but existential one
- Habermas theory focused on Europe BUT “Yemen is not a bourgeois society, and the
Yemeni public sphere does not arise out of bourgeois notions of individuality or privacy in
the intimate world of the family” AND “Qāt chews are not predicated on the existence of
robust state institutions but actually thrive in their absence”
- “Qāt chews as an institutionalized everyday practice can serve both ruler and ruled,
providing an authoritarian regime with crucial information while giving ordinary individuals
and an organized opposition more freedom than they would enjoy in other authoritarian
circumstances” (p. 79)
- Example raises distinction between democratic practices and liberal values
- Democratic practices not necessarily mean democratic regime
- We should therefore avoid minimalist view on democracy and instead think of democratic
practices
€9,39
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
hueckinglisa
1,0
(1)

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
11 maanden geleden

1,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
hueckinglisa Universiteit Leiden
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
3
Laatst verkocht
11 maanden geleden

1,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen