100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Part 1 minor, problems 1,2,3,4 - Minor Cross-Cultural Psychology (FSWP-K-3-6)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
2
Pagina's
52
Geüpload op
30-09-2023
Geschreven in
2023/2024

Summary - Minor Cross-Cultural Psychology (FSWP-K-3-6). Theme 1,2,3,4. (Part 1 minor)












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
30 september 2023
Aantal pagina's
52
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Problem 1


THE SELF-CONCEPT – HEINE ET AL. (2010)

Independent vs interdependent self-concepts

 Self-concept = Not innate, shaped by cultural experiences, present already in
kindergarten-aged children
o Influence psychological processes as perception, cognition, motivation,
emotion and behavior
o Evidence of different self-concept  Twenty Statements Test
 Western cultures = Statements reflecting inner psychological
characteristics (attitudes, personality traits, abilities)
 Non-Western cultures = Statements indicating relational roles and
membership possessed

 Independent self-concept = Inner attributes reflecting the essence of a person
o Stable across situations and lifespan, unique, significant for regulating
behaviors, people feel obligated to publicly advertise themselves in ways
consistent with these attributes
 More common in Western cultures
 Interdependent self-concept = The self derives from relations with significant
others
o Attend how their behavior affects others and it is not so stable or unique,
rather embedded in a larger social group (e.g., Japanese person acting
different based on who is in the room)
 More common in not-Western cultures

Self-consistency vs flexibility

 Independent self = Relatively stable across situations  People would make
sacrifices in order to preserve a semblance of self-consistency
o Not much variability in emotions
 More research focused on this type
 Interdependent self = More unstable across situations  Depends on one’s
relationships
o More variability in emotions & contradictory self-views
 It does not mean that self-concept is unstable but context-specific
self-view!

Insider vs outside phenomenological experiences

 Insider = People prioritize their own perspective, thereby making sense of the
world in terms of how it unfolds in front of their own eyes  Independent
 Outsider = People prioritize the perspective of an audience and attend to the
world and themselves in terms of how they imagine it appears to others 
Interdependent
o E.g., East Asians are less impacted by the presence of a mirror because
they already consider themselves from the perspective of an audience

Multicultural selves

Two complementary perspectives:

 Multiple self-concepts  Both simultaneously accessible (e.g., Asian-American
performing intermediately on psychological tests compared to Asian in Asia)

,  Sequentially activated self-concepts  Frame-switching depending on
situations or primes
o Likely when the dual cultural identities are integrated rather than in
opposition & in second-generation immigrants
 People have multiple knowledge structures associated together
 One facilitates the activation of another part of the same network

! People with monocultural experiences also frame-switch but multicultural do it more

 Multicultural people are more creative and flexible

MOTIVATION

Motivation for self-enhancement and self-esteem

 Self-enhancement = Desire to view oneself positively
o More common in Western than not-Western cultures who attend negative
information about themselves in order to improve – Possible explanations:
 East Asians are more motivated to enhance their group selves
(Inconsistent)
 East Asians are more self-critical for domains considered important
to them (Inconsistent)
 East Asians are presenting themselves self-critically but privately
evaluate themselves in self-enhancing manners (Mixed)

Approach and avoidance motivation

 Western cultures = More evidence for approach motivation  People do not
want to lose their “face”
 Not-Western cultures = More evidence for avoidance motivation
o E.g., Opportunities to lose are more important, persist more on a task after
failure, more motivated by negative role models

Agency and control

 Independent cultures = World seen malleable and their selves stable  Sense
of primary control over perceptions, goals, wishes
o Stronger motivation for uniqueness
o Defend your honor
 Interdependent cultures = World seen stable and their selves malleable 
Likely to engage in secondary control strategies
o More likely to conform
o Power & agency concentrated in groups
 Critical life decision made my family and not the individual (e.g.,
Marriage)

RELATIONSHIPS

 Relationships hold a more privileged position in interdependent cultures and are
viewed in less conditional terms as compared to independent cultures
o They remain stable over the years and there are few opportunities to form
new relationship or dissolve existing ones
 In independent cultures = Relationship mobility  A relationship
must benefit both parts

Limitations: Database largely focused on North American and East Asians – Not all
processes are universal

, INDIVIDUALISISM VS COLLECTIVISM - MA AND SCHOENEMAN (1997)

Aim: The article compared Kenyan & American self-concept based on the Twenty
Statements Test (TST)

Cultural differences in self-concept

 Individualism (North America and norther and western Europe)
o People emphasize their private self and prioritize personal goals
 Egocentric, separate, autonomous, independent
 Based on exchange relationship with concern for equity
 Children encouraged to explore and to be autonomous
 Collectivism (Latin America, Asia, Africa)
o People emphasize relationships with others and prioritize collective goals
 Important attributes are public roles, statuses, relationships
 More likely to conform
 Children are taught obedience, reliability and proper behavior

 Hypotheses & Sample:
o Samburu and Maasai tribes expected to respond with more social
categories to the TST
o Nairobi sample expected to be less collective because of the urbanization,
modernization, westernization and education in the capital
o American college students sample expected to be individualistic
o Women expected to have higher percentages of social responses
 17 American college students, 15 Kenyan college students, 10
employed adults in Nairobi, 21 members of Maasai tribe and 18
members of Samburu Tribe

 Results
o Pastoral nomads in Kenya are more collective and had a less individualized
self-concept
o Decreased level of collectivism in Nairobi caused by urbanization,
development, modernization and education
 College students responded with fewer social categories than
university staff and hotel employees (who were older)  Likely to
be more traditional in self-concept
o Women in all groups have more social responses than men

 Limitations
o Small sample size
o Methodological issue  2 pastoral nomads group responded to TST in an
interview because the majority were illiterate while the rest in a written
form
o Interview TST was administered with a number of people presented while
the written form was completed individually


SUBJECTIVE CULTURE – TRIANDIS (2002)

 Culture = Shared pattern of beliefs, attitudes, norms, role perception & values
o Material culture = Dress, food, houses, highways, tools, machines
o Subjective culture = Language, economy, education, politics, law,
philosophy and religion
 Subculture = Shared other elements as gender, physical type,
neighborhood, occupation, standard of living…

, When studying culture it is important to check:

1. Whether or not ideas are shared
2. Whether shared responses correspond to a language, a time period and a
geographic region

ELEMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE CULTURE

Categories

 Categories are used to describe different stimuli (e.g., Colors)
o Some cultures have many words for a particular domain while others have
few words
 Etic categories = Occur universally
 Emic categories = Culture specific, associations
 Categories are linked to each other also as beliefs (e.g., Religion = If I believe  I
go the heaven; If I donate organs  I can save a life)

 Attitudes = Ideas charged with affect (emotion) predisposing action (e.g., “My
family"; I feel scared when I see a snake, so I go away)
 Norms = Ideas about behavior expected of members of a group
o Tight cultures = People are expected to behave as specified by norms or
you get punished
 Usually when a culture is homogenous, and people are very
interdependent
o Loose cultures = People are less likely to be punished, less strict
 Usually when a culture is under the influence of many other
cultures, people are not too interdependent, or supervision is
difficult
o Roles = Part of norms, correct behavior of people who hold a position in a
social group (e.g., Father)
 Prescriptive elements = What is recommended/established (e.g.,
Father should protect their daughters)
 Proscriptive elements = What is not allowed (e.g., Father should
not hit their daughters)

 Tasks = Sequence of behaviors (e.g., Passing a law)
 Values = Conceptions of the desirable states or behaviors
o Self-direction = Creativity, freedom, choosing own goals, curious
o Stimulation = Varied life, exciting life, daring
o Hedonism = Pleasure, enjoying life
o Achievement = Ambitious, successful, capable
o Power = Authority, wealth, social recognition
o Security = Social order, clean, health, sense of belonging
o Conformity = Obedient, self-disciplined, politeness
o Tradition = Respect for tradition, humble, devout
o Benevolence = Helpful, loyal, forgiving
o Universalism = Broadminded, social justice, world of beauty (e.g., Donate
organs)

 Value orientation
 Human nature: evil, neutral, mixture, good; mutable or immutable
 Man-nature-can: subjugation to, harmony with or mastery over
nature
 Human activities: being, being-in-becoming or doing
 Relationship of humans:
 Lineal (e.g., doing what the elders want)

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
itsross Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
29
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
21
Documenten
14
Laatst verkocht
2 dagen geleden

4,0

2 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen