100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

AQA AS PHYSICS 7407/1 Paper 1 Mark scheme June 2023

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
38
Cijfer
A
Geüpload op
11-09-2023
Geschreven in
2023/2024

AQA AS PHYSICS 7407/1 Paper 1 Mark scheme June 2023

Instelling
Vak











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
11 september 2023
Aantal pagina's
38
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

AQA


AS
PHYSICS
7407/1
Paper 1
Mark scheme
June 2023
Version: 1.0 Final




*236A7407/1/MS*

, MARK SCHEME – AS PHYSICS – 7407/1 – JUNE
2023

Mark schemes are prepared by the Lead Assessment Writer and considered, together with
the relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any
amendments made at the standardisation events which all associates participate in and is
the scheme which was used by them in this examination. The standardisation process
ensures that the mark scheme covers the students’ responses to questions and that every
associate understands and applies it in the same correct way.
As preparation for standardisation each associate analyses a number of students’ scripts.
Alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed and legislated
for. If, after the standardisation process, associates encounter unusual answers which have
not been raised they are required to refer these to the Lead Examiner.




.




2

, MARK SCHEME – AS PHYSICS – 7407/1 – JUNE
2023


Physics - Mark scheme instructions to examiners

1. General

The mark scheme for each question shows:

 the marks available for each part of the question
 the total marks available for the question
 the typical answer or answers which are expected
 extra information to help the Examiner make his or her judgement and help to delineate
what is acceptable or not worthy of credit or, in discursive answers, to give an overview
of the area in which a mark or marks may be awarded.

The extra information is aligned to the appropriate answer in the left-hand part of the
mark scheme and should only be applied to that item in the mark scheme.

At the beginning of a part of a question a reminder may be given, for example: where
consequential marking needs to be considered in a calculation; or the answer may be on
the diagram or at a different place on the script.

In general the right-hand side of the mark scheme is there to provide those extra details
which confuse the main part of the mark scheme yet may be helpful in ensuring that
marking is straightforward and consistent.

2. Emboldening

2.1 In a list of acceptable answers where more than one mark is available ‘any two
from’ is used, with the number of marks emboldened. Each of the following bullet
points is a potential mark.
2.2 A bold and is used to indicate that both parts of the answer are required to award the
mark.
2.3 Alternative answers acceptable for a mark are indicated by the use of or. Different
terms in the mark scheme are shown by a / ; eg allow smooth / free movement.

3. Marking points

3.1 Marking of lists
This applies to questions requiring a set number of responses, but for which candidates have
provided extra responses. The general principle to be followed in such a situation is that
‘right + wrong = wrong’.

Each error/contradiction negates each correct response. So, if the number of
errors/contradictions equals or exceeds the number of marks available for the question, no
marks can be awarded.

However, responses considered to be neutral (often prefaced by ‘Ignore’ in the mark
scheme) are not penalised.

3.2 Marking procedure for calculations
Full marks can usually be given for a correct numerical answer without working shown
3

, MARK SCHEME – AS PHYSICS – 7407/1 – JUNE
2023
unless the question states ‘Show your working’. However, if a correct numerical answer can
be evaluated from incorrect physics then working will be required. The mark scheme will
indicate both this and the credit (if any) that can be allowed for the incorrect approach.




4

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
teachertestbank Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
327
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
183
Documenten
1426
Laatst verkocht
3 dagen geleden

4,2

62 beoordelingen

5
36
4
10
3
11
2
4
1
1

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen