100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Topic: Crisis of Trust (Lectures + Articles)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
13
Pagina's
9
Geüpload op
28-06-2023
Geschreven in
2022/2023

Summary of all lectures + required literature of the Topic Crisis of Trust










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 juni 2023
Aantal pagina's
9
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Samenvatting Topic: The Crisis of Trust

Lecture 1: Introduction and conceptualization crisis of trust

Society is built on trust  but people do not seem to trust organizations much anymore
 Cycle of distrust between media and government; fake news as the core of the problem

What is trust?  the general sense of well-being in relation to oneself and towards others
 Trust is important because it helps improve economic processes and it’s necessary to build a civil
society and a sustainable democracy. Trust in institutions depend upon meeting social expectations
 Concepts related to trust in the context of organizations: legitimacy, reputation, issues, power,
ethics, conflict, crisis, stakeholders etc.
 What do organizations do to gain trust?  strategic communication
 Edelman Trust Barometer: government is less trusted than businesses

Ariely (2015)
 Relation between media trust and political trust  both important for trust in democracy
 Importance of media environment  media are windows through which we understand the world
around us  shaping citizen political assessment. Different media environments:
1) Media autonomy: allows for more critical media
2) Journalistic professionalism: public-service orientation and professional norms
3) Party/press parallelism: media system parallels party system
 Virtuous circle: relation media trust and political trust weaker when more media autonomy and
professionalism and less party/press parallelism  well-functioning democracy requires
trustworthy flow of information

Flew (2019)
 Relationship between populism and declining trust
 Factors underpinning the rise of populism: (1) traditional media, (2) mediatization, (3) rise of fake
news, (4) the platformised internet and the rise of social news, (5) the crisis of institutional trust, (6)
public opinion data, (7) lower trust in digital platforms and (8) the spiral of distrust

Moreno et al. (2021)
 Trust is critical to the functioning of our society (helps to cope with risk and uncertainty)  central
to the practice of PR (strategic communication)
 New Institutionalism Theory: how is trust in PR perceived on three levels?
1) Macro: society/professional
2) Meso: department in the organization
3) Micro: individual and group actions
 Individual trust is higher than trust in departments and profession  thus building trust in the
organizations and their context, not so much in the leaders
 Communication that can built trust is based on knowledge, transparency, and ethics

Lecture 2: Trust affected by media bias and misinformation

Why is trust in news media declining?  polarization of news and concentration of the elites (biases)

The sources of mistrust
- Structural biases: negativity and distortion bias
- Biases on the individual level (norms of objectivity)
- Accusation of fake news and talking about fake news (salience and context of misinformation
threat)

, Where does this come from?  changes in the media landscape: commercial pressure, professionalization,
decreasing press-party parallelism, measurable output, struggle for complete coverage of what happens in
society  choices in news selection and production  results in media biases

Selection heuristics and looking for the largest audience
1) Negativity bias: bad news (more dramatic and sensational) is more salient than good news
 News value theory: selection criteria  attracts larger audience
2) Distortion bias: the low frequency of events of certain incidents partly explains why they are given
more attention  news as paradoxical (it’s about the exceptions)
 Episodic framing (individual circumstances) rather than thematic framing (general context)
 Results in distorted worldview and biases  reality versus ‘’media reality’’

Van der Meer et al. (2019)
 The public depends on the media as a source of information and journalists decide what goes in the
news and what does not and with this decision, journalists have the possibility to create our reality
 Case of plane crashes: More media attention for aviation incidents, but the actual aviation incidents
have decreased  distorted view on the safety of planes

Skovsgaard et al. (2013)
 How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm
 Objectivity as the defining norm of modern journalism  pervading new production by guiding
journalists when they select, collect, and present the news  audience must feel that they can
trust this ‘second-hand ‘information
 Attack on their objectivity
1. Journalists’ failure to meet the requirements; political bias of journalists/ news organization
2. Ability to describe reality; construction rather than description; structurally more biased
3. Objectivity undesirable; should take a moral stance; engage in improving societal problems

Elements of objectivity: (1) no subjectivity, (2) balance, (3) hard facts, (4) value judgement

Role perceptions:
1) Passive mirror: dissemination of information, reflecting reality
2) Watchdog: active; standing for marginalized groups in society
3) Public forum: Letting regular people voice their opinions and try to engage them in debates
4) Public mobilizer: leading the public towards solutions to societal problems.

Egelhofer & Lecheler (2019)
 Fake news as a two-dimensional concept
1) As a genre: describing the deliberate creation of pseudo journalistic disinformation; the actual
intention of misleading, creation of non-real news (e.g., propaganda)
 Where does it come from?
 Technological developments: digital and social media; fake news financially attractive
 Socio-political trends: mistrust, polarization, higher acceptance of alternative sources
2) As a label: describing the political instrumentalization of the terms to delegitimize news media;
To disregard news media without any arguments, biased, level of emotions; characterized by
hostility and incivility (the weaponization of fake news)  delegitimization of journalism
 Where does it come from?
 Politicians can now circumvent journalistic gatekeeping and talk directly to the public
 Increasing attacks on elites
€7,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
laradm Universiteit van Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
25
Lid sinds
5 jaar
Aantal volgers
24
Documenten
6
Laatst verkocht
6 maanden geleden

0,0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen