100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary KRM 320 Section B semester test 2 everything you need to know

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
24
Geüpload op
02-11-2022
Geschreven in
2022/2023

KRM 320 Section B semester test 2 everything you need to know

Instelling
Vak










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
2 november 2022
Aantal pagina's
24
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

KRM SEMESTER TEST 2
SECTION B (CONTEMPORARY CRIME)
RISK SOCIETY
RISK SOCIETY
 A developmental phase of modern society in which social, political, economic, and
individual risks increasingly tend to escape institutions for monitoring and protection in
society (Ulrich Beck).


RISK
 Recognition and judgement we experience when faced with uncertainty.
 Risk is not new phenomena (it has just moved from natural to man-made risk).
 Recognition and judgement relationship = we reflect iot judge iot make decisions
about what to do next.
 2 levels of reflects and judge:
– (1) society (uncertainty/anxiety affects structure of events).
– (2) individual (faced with choices and courses of action which lack
support/rules + deviance: going against societies norms and values).


RISK AND REFLEXIVITY
 Anxiety about new risk failure of institutions critical questioning of current
policies and practices.
 Reflection:
– Is risk concrete or perception? – crisis in another part of world IS
concrete but if not directly affecting us then it is perception.
 People perceive risk differently (some people more scared of crime than others).


MAIN ARGUMENTS OF ULRICH BECK
 Increased wealth production need for money certain risks (reciprocal
relationship).
 Creation of new risks is unintended by-product of modernization.
 New problems require new solutions (use reflexive modernization).
 Industrial solutions (increased production, redistribution and increased social
protection) IS NOT sufficient to fix global crisis.

,  Addressing paradigm of modernization = rethinking, reprogramming and policy
change:
– Paradigm because – we modernize to address problems but modernization
creates new risks (solutions to risks create new risks).


REFLEXIVE MODERNITY
 Reflecting & making judgement calls where reflection not previously necessary.
 Reduces modern structures to create new modernity.
 Modernization radicalizes itself.
 Classic v reflexive modernity:
– Classic (used to have)
> skepticism about religion, world demystified through science.
– Reflexive (currently have)
> Skepticism about science as it causes hazards.
> Demystification of science and modernity (they caused disasters).
> Restructuring and re-conceptualizing what we know leads to space
of radicalization.


AXES OF CONFLICT
These are all intertwined:
 Ecological conflicts.  Global warming + pollution (ecological)
conflicts with financial crises as more money
EFT  Global financial crises. needed will increase pollution
 Terrorism crisis needs money to combat but
 Global terrorist networks. we have a financial crisis


COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL V RISK SOCIETY
INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY RISK SOCIETY
(Marx, Weber, Durkheim) (Beck)
Central How do we create and distribute How do we prevent and minimize risk
question wealth? resulting from modernization?
Subjects are… Impoverished. Prosperous but frightened.

Ideal Equality. Safety.

Being and Being determines consciousness – Consciousness determines being –
consciousness what you do determined what you what you know determines what you
know. do (knowledge necessary for
recognition of risks).
Consequences Simple and visible. Complex and sometimes invisible.
CONSEQUENCES OF RISK SOCIETY

,  Old values and traditional support networks disappearing (look after ourselves
rather than community, family life and traditional belief system under threat, lack
of dominant ideology).
 International inequality (poor countries at greater risks due to extreme poverty).
 Social and technological risks interconnected.


HASSAN ARTICLE (techno-environmental risks and ecological modernization in double risk societies)
 Conflicting perspectives: environmental economics vs ecological
modernization vs risk society thesis:
– Exist on spectrum: limits to grow growth unlimited.
Apocalyptic future and we need urgent World is facing fewer ecological problems than ever before and
 2 sociological theories: ecological restructuring of capitalism only way to deal with these problems is to encourage more growth

– (1) Risk society thesis (opposes institutions and policymakers
dependance on scientists in determining environmental risk).
– (2) ecological modernization (science, technology and mainstream
political actors are important in solving environmental problems) –
ecological growth can continue whilst ensuring environmental protection.
 ‘double risk’ societies = traditional, southern, poor countries faced with danger of
risk society before achieving post-industrial status (not ALL 3 rd world countries).
– (1) continuous struggle for fulfilling material needs (traditional risks).
– (2) increasing social anxiety about high consequence
techno-environmental risks (modern risks).
Harm to human health and natural environment presented by technological and industrial products

Western risk societies are becoming self-correcting which exposes double risk societies to more problems bcs of globalization (global
capitalism exploits poor countries by relocating rich countries pollution and resource depleting industries to poor countries).


 Ecological modernization theory:
– Need for society, market actors and state to manage environment.
– Economic growth can be separated from raw material, energy use and
waste generation through application of environmentally friendly
technology and redesign of institutions.
– Key stages of development and maturation:
> 1st phase – emphasizes role of science and technology in
environmental reform (no social transformation).
€5,41
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
kiaradavey University of Pretoria
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
20
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
14
Documenten
43
Laatst verkocht
10 maanden geleden

4,5

4 beoordelingen

5
2
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen