100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

Example Artefact EPQ- Evaluating Sources

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
6
Geüpload op
31-08-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

This EPQ achieved an A* and was on creating a series of artwork inspired by Rene Magritte exploring rebellion within the main issues faced in 2020. This is an example of how to evaluate your sources in a way that is detailed enough to achieve high marks. It meets all of the requirements for the OCR EPQ specification.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
31 augustus 2022
Aantal pagina's
6
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Overig
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Source Currency Relevance Authority Accuracy Purpose

10 Surrealist Rene It was posted in 2017 This source is very The author only uses There isn’t any This information is
Magritte Paintings which was a while relevant to my project their first name ‘Ana’ indication of where there to inform and
Ana after Rene Magritte’s as it talks about and isn't a very well the information is inspire which were
time so it doesn’t have Magritte’s work and known person. This from but as it’s an both very helpful to
any newer gives information on however, doesn’t article on a website me. Their information
information. It talks what the was going mean she isn’t with lots of different is clear and concise
through some of the through when making credible as her article articles on it it is which is nice but I feel
most famous Magritte art and what his has been posted on presumed that she is like there could be
paintings which was paintings mean. This an art website. There a researcher or art deeper analysis of
very helpful for me to helped me to is contact information expert who works for Magritte’s work.
link these ideas to my translate those ideas on the website for this company. However, Ana doesn’t
paintings. However, I into modern day Ana which shows use opinionated
have to take issues from 2020. that she isn’t hiding language in the
information like this The audience was so she’s open to article- she uses
with a pinch of salt as people who like at, feedback. declaratives which
it could be very surrealism of Magritte shows she is being
subjective and the which is similar to my knowledgeable about
writer's opinion. intended audience for a topic she,
my artefact. This presumably, knows a
website is designed lot about.
to offer inspiration
which it did.

Rene Magritte There isn’t a date on This website is all Again, the website Not much evidence This website is used
Anon the website of when it about Rene Magritte was anonymous so as there isn’t a to inform people
was started which and was probably the this can affect the named author and it about Magritte but
immediately means most useful and credibility because I hasn’t been referred doesn’t offer objective
there is information important website in don’t know whether to so this decreases opinions. They’re not
missing from the finding out about they have fact it’s credibility quite a giving their opinion of
source. However, as Magritte’s life and checked. This may bit. However the Magritte but they are
the information is paintings. There was be a weak spot in my writing is free from just trying to educate

, about a man who lived detailed analysis of project which I would biased opinions as it their audience about
a while ago, this his work which have to make sure I is declarative about surrealist art.
doesn’t mean it isn’t helped me to don’t do if I were to the facts of Rene’s
credible- older understand what do this project again. life and paintings.
sources don’t matter messages he was
as much in this stage trying to convey.
of research.

Beyond a tragic fire This was written in The article goes into The website is a There are citations There are few
season: a window February 2020 which a lot of detail about popular place to look from sources they’ve persuasive sentences
of opportunity to was very close after the effects of the for articles about a used in their article in this article but to
the wildfires in wildfires from a range range of academic which shows they are some extent they
address climate
Australia. This means of perspectives- topics. There is a link knowledgeable about point some of the
change? the information is up human, physical and to an email address the disaster. There blame of the wildfires
Baldwin and Ross to date and the environmental. It was meaning their are also figures and towards human
authors were around specific to the fires readers can contact data to look at which action. However this
while the disaster that I was relating my them if they want to. shows they want their is factual and
occurred so their painting to. It also says that there audience to use their followed up with
sources and views are have been currently information for other evidence.
credible. It was very 3,746 on this article projects.
helpful with ideas on which shows people
why the wildfires were do use the website to
so bad and what find information.
affects it had on
different people and
wildlife.

Australia fires: A It was published on This was only really The BBC has BBC is the most The purpose is to
visual guide to the the 31st of January helpful to find basic incredibly qualified widely used source of inform people of the
bushfire crisis which was during the facts and figures but and intelligent information in the UK. wildfires using a lot of
wildfires so it is very didn’t go into a whole people. It is known It offers information shocking statistics. It
BBC
current which is lot of detail. However, throughout the on almost anything in also I think has the
important for this it helped to get a gist western world and is the form of purpose to make
section of my of the vastness of the an important source documentaries, people feel like they

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
suzannateal Chenderit
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
11
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
8
Documenten
14
Laatst verkocht
4 maanden geleden

3,5

2 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen