‘The main reason for Conservative dominance in the years 1951-1964 was Labour
disunity’. Assess the validity of this view.
Conservative dominance across the years 1951 to 1964 can be attributed to a number of
factors. Some argue that it was due to the key personalities in the party during the period,
such as Macmillan and Butler, who presented a charismatic and confident image to the
public, which secured votes. However, some disagree and state that it was based on the
shifts in ideology and was in fact due to the Conservative’s policies and the adherence to
post-war consensus that resonated positively with the general public allowing them to
remain dominant. Alternatively, others argue as the question states that it was Labour
disunity that led to the Conservative dominance, as they did not present themselves as a
viable alternative. However, it can be most strongly argued that it was the Conservatives
policies and significantly the economy, which was the ‘driving force’ behind voter’s choice
and therefore political party success.
It can be argued that it was the Conservative leaders and policies, which led to the party’s
success during this period. The Conservatives can be depicted as the only party at the time
to have confident leaders and a united party. Significantly Macmillan was nicknamed
‘supermac’ as he led the party to a comfortable victory, pushing the Conservative
parliamentary majority up to 100 seats in October 1959. Macmillan appeared confident and
in full control of affairs and in addition used the new political opportunities by television
advantageously. Macmillan successfully reached the goal of 300,000 new homes per year
and further Conservative confidence was seen through Lord Woollon and Butlers’ lead roles.
Also the policies of the Conservatives, importantly post-war consensus maintained a good
relationship with the trade unions, which is a major contrast to the Labour party’s
relationship with the trade unions. Decisions to privatise industries showed the party’s
movements away from right winged policies. Moreover, adherence with the post-war
consensus included Britain having a mixed economy, full employment and welfare benefits.
These improvements for workers and the representation of the party as being united and
having confident leaders such as Macmillan boosted the Conservative popularity securing
their dominance over this period.
In agreeing with the statement, it can be argued that… (preview ends)
disunity’. Assess the validity of this view.
Conservative dominance across the years 1951 to 1964 can be attributed to a number of
factors. Some argue that it was due to the key personalities in the party during the period,
such as Macmillan and Butler, who presented a charismatic and confident image to the
public, which secured votes. However, some disagree and state that it was based on the
shifts in ideology and was in fact due to the Conservative’s policies and the adherence to
post-war consensus that resonated positively with the general public allowing them to
remain dominant. Alternatively, others argue as the question states that it was Labour
disunity that led to the Conservative dominance, as they did not present themselves as a
viable alternative. However, it can be most strongly argued that it was the Conservatives
policies and significantly the economy, which was the ‘driving force’ behind voter’s choice
and therefore political party success.
It can be argued that it was the Conservative leaders and policies, which led to the party’s
success during this period. The Conservatives can be depicted as the only party at the time
to have confident leaders and a united party. Significantly Macmillan was nicknamed
‘supermac’ as he led the party to a comfortable victory, pushing the Conservative
parliamentary majority up to 100 seats in October 1959. Macmillan appeared confident and
in full control of affairs and in addition used the new political opportunities by television
advantageously. Macmillan successfully reached the goal of 300,000 new homes per year
and further Conservative confidence was seen through Lord Woollon and Butlers’ lead roles.
Also the policies of the Conservatives, importantly post-war consensus maintained a good
relationship with the trade unions, which is a major contrast to the Labour party’s
relationship with the trade unions. Decisions to privatise industries showed the party’s
movements away from right winged policies. Moreover, adherence with the post-war
consensus included Britain having a mixed economy, full employment and welfare benefits.
These improvements for workers and the representation of the party as being united and
having confident leaders such as Macmillan boosted the Conservative popularity securing
their dominance over this period.
In agreeing with the statement, it can be argued that… (preview ends)
