100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary SPR 421 Study Unit 1 to 4

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
2
Pagina's
62
Geüpload op
19-08-2022
Geschreven in
2022/2023

In depth summaries of study Unit 1 to 4 for semester test 1 of SPR 421. Contains notes from the classes and textbook.

Instelling
Vak











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 augustus 2022
Aantal pagina's
62
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

SPR 420
Semester Test 1 Summaries

Contents
Study Unit 1: Introduction...................................................................2
CPA phases................................................................................ 2
Criminal procedure before trial........................................................2
Law of evidence Recap.................................................................. 4
Study Unit 2: Diversion & Flowchart of the criminal process..........................5
1. Flowchart of the criminal process..................................................5
2. Diversion............................................................................... 5
→ S 41: Diversion by Prosecutor ito minor offences.........................6
→ S 51/52: Diversion by Prosecutor ito chapter 8............................9
Diversion of schedule 3 offences..............................................11
Criminal capacity of children..................................................12
To prosecute a child who is 10 years or older but under 14..............13
Study Unit 3: Plea & sentencing agreements............................................14
Arraignment & plea of an accused...................................................14
When plea by accused may be dispensed with..............................17
Plea bargaining.......................................................................... 28
Traditional plea bargaining....................................................28
Statutory plea bargaining.......................................................29
Pleas which may be raised by accused..............................................32
1. Pleas mentioned in the act.................................................32
4. Plea of prior conviction or acquittal.......................................33
5. Pardon by the president.....................................................40
6. Plea to jurisdiction of the court............................................40
7. Discharge from prosecution................................................41
8. Lack of authority of the prosecutor.......................................41
9. Plea as to an order of court on an unreasonable delay in a trial......41
10. Lis pendens................................................................... 43
11. Pleas in case of criminal defamation....................................43
S 106(4): After pleading accused is entitled to verdict...........................43
Study Unit 4: Indictments and charge sheets............................................44
4.1 Lodgement, service of indictments, charge sheets...........................44
4.1.1 In the high court..........................................................46
4.1.2 In the lower courts.......................................................47
4.2 Form and substance of charges/indictments..................................47
4.2.1 Necessary averments in the charge sheet............................47


1

, 4.2.2 Negativing exceptions, exemptions, provisos, excuses or
qualifications............................................................49
4.2.3 Inclusion of unnecessary averments...................................50
4.2.4 Obligation to provide particulars.......................................51
4.3 Defect in indictment or charge cured by evidence...........................52
4.4 Correction of errors in charge...................................................53
4.5 Splitting of charges/ duplication of convictions...............................55
4.6 Joinder of offences................................................................61


Key:
S
Learning objectives
t
Legislation
Case law u
d
y Unit 1: Introduction
CPA phases
 S 1-74: Phase 1
o Investigation of crime allegedly committed
o Timeframe: offence – trial
o Proactive (law enforcement must protect public from crime)
 S75 – 270: Phase 2 Trial judgement
o Beginning of the trial until judgment by the court
 S271-301: Phase 3 Sentencing phase
o Only if court decided that the accused is guilty of the offence
o Starts at conviction of the accused until court imposes a sentence
 S302- 327: Phase 4 Legal remedies after trial + sentencing
o Starts from the moment of sentencing until last possible remedy
available have been disposed of

Criminal procedure before trial
 Purpose of phase: to investigate the alleged crime and to decide whether
there is sufficient admissible evidence to incriminate the person alleged of
committing the crime and which justify a prosecution
 S 205 Constitution: SAPS primarily responsible for investing crime
o To assist police to do so CPA has many provisions granting them
necessary authority (S 20 – 23; 25 – 27; 39 – 42, 48 – 49)



2

, As soon as alleged offence reported at police station → file will be opened
= “docket”
o All witness statements taken by police + all other documents
relevant to investigation are filed in the docket
o All steps taken by police during investigation documented in the
docket ( “investigation diary” part of the docket)
o VS civil litigation w/ court file containing all pleadings
 In criminal case no one can see docket besides police and
prosecutor (will be irregularity – sufficient to set aside
conviction)
 In practice usually staple docket to ensure the
privileged info is protected
 Exception: to hand out statement which was in
docket where witness deviates from statement in
docket
 Lay a foundation (ie. meet admissibility
requirements for documents)
 → Ask court to declare them a hostile witness +
cross-examine them
 In civil case presiding officer must be familiar w/ contents
o Consists of 3 parts:
 A: Complainants statement, eyewitness statements
 B: Clients previous convictions (from criminal record
bureau)
 C: Investigative diary (letters exchanged between
investigating officer + prosecutor)
 After conclusion of investigation + if police can identify and find the
accused → docket will be submitted to the Director of Public Prosecutions
(DPP) or to a person duly authorise to by DPP
 Prosecutor is usually the responsible person
o Will study the docket + decide whether the investigation of the
alleged crime was conducted satisfactory
o If not → prosecutor will return the docket to the police with
instructions to complete
o If satisfied→ he/she will decide to prosecute or not
 Test to be applied by State before a prosecution: whether there is a
reasonable prospect of success



3

, o If prosecutor decides not to prosecute → docket will be returned
to the police + matter is considered finalised
 Unless police later find further evidence
 If State declines → “private prosecution” could be
considered by an interested party (e.g. family of victim)
 S18: State as a general rule has 20 years to conduct a prosecution
 If prosecutor decides to prosecute, charge is formulated, steps taken to
ensure the attendance the suspect to appear an appropriate court to face
charges (s 80 – 104)
 Prosecutor determines jurisdiction +which court case will be instituted in
 Every defence lawyer entitled to file memorandum to not or to proceed to
trial
o Must first reach out to local prosecutor
 If declines → Directors of public prosecutions office
 If decline → National director of public prosecutions office
o Ie. representations (no prescribed formalities)
o DPP or NDPP is entitled to alter decision of prosecutor
 S7-17 Private prosecutions
o Strict requirements:
 Nulla prosecuta = paper saying no reasonable prospect of
success ∴ state will not proceed with case
 DPP may issue certificate
o Deposit at clerk of criminal court (but very expensive)
o Risk involved: if lose you pay accused’s fees
o State can intervene half-way through trial + State may take over to
complete the prosecution
o Exception to rule: civil security in criminal cases
o Skip the role of SAPS/NPA
 In practice: regional magistrate conduct 99% of all criminal cases
o Exception high treason & high profile cases


Law of evidence Recap
 Documentary evidence
o R v Daye: any written thing capable of being evidence regardless of
what it is written on
o s 33 CPEA: any book, map, plan, drawing or photograph




4

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
tukslawnotes University of Pretoria
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
55
Lid sinds
6 jaar
Aantal volgers
38
Documenten
15
Laatst verkocht
7 maanden geleden

4,5

13 beoordelingen

5
9
4
2
3
2
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen