100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

Test Bank for Research Methods, Statistics, and Applications, 2nd Edition

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
17
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
24-02-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Test Bank for Research Methods, Statistics, and Applications, 2nd Edition Chapter 1: Thinking Like a Researcher Test Bank Multiple Choice 1. Which of the following is the best definition of critical thinking? A. a process of evaluating information based on one’s personal experiences B. a process of considering information based on current knowledge in a field while carefully avoiding personal bias C. a process of criticizing current knowledge in a field D. a process of unquestionably following what experts in a field suggest Ans: B Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Thinking Critically About Ethics Difficulty Level: Medium 2. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Nuremberg code? A. Nazi experiments B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments C. Milgram’s obedience study D. Zimbardo’s prison study Ans: A Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Medium 3. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Belmont code? A. Nazi experiments B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments C. Milgram’s obedience study D. Zimbardo’s prison study Ans: B Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Medium 4. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments occurred in what country? A. Germany B. England C. United States D. Mexico Ans: C Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Knowledge Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Easy 5. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments are considered unethical because of the use of ______. A. debriefing B. informed consent C. deception D. coercive incentives Ans: C Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a researcher. Cognitive Domain: Comprehension Answer Location: Ethics Codes Difficulty Level: Easy

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
24 februari 2022
Aantal pagina's
17
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Test Bank for Research Methods, Statistics,
and Applications, 2nd Edition, Kathrynn A.
Adams, Eva K. Lawrence

,Chapter 1: Thinking Like a Researcher
Test Bank
Multiple Choice

1. Which of the following is the best definition of critical thinking?
A. a process of evaluating information based on one’s personal experiences
B. a process of considering information based on current knowledge in a field while
carefully avoiding personal bias
C. a process of criticizing current knowledge in a field
D. a process of unquestionably following what experts in a field suggest
Ans: B
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Thinking Critically About Ethics
Difficulty Level: Medium

2. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Nuremberg code?
A. Nazi experiments
B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments
C. Milgram’s obedience study
D. Zimbardo’s prison study
Ans: A
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Medium

3. Which of the following was the motivation behind the Belmont code?
A. Nazi experiments
B. Tuskegee syphilis experiments
C. Milgram’s obedience study
D. Zimbardo’s prison study
Ans: B
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Medium

4. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments occurred in what country?
A. Germany
B. England

, C. United States
D. Mexico
Ans: C
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Knowledge
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Easy

5. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments are considered unethical because of the use of
______.
A. debriefing
B. informed consent
C. deception
D. coercive incentives
Ans: C
Learning Objective: 1-1: The connection between thinking critically and thinking like a
researcher.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Easy

6. Which of the following was a social psychological experiment that is considered
ethically questionable because of the use of deception?
A. Milgram’s obedience study
B. Zimbardo’s prison experiment
C. Tuskegee Study
D. Nuremburg Study
Ans: A
Learning Objective: 1-2: How to think critically about research ethics, including
understanding and applying the ethical principles and standards of your discipline.
Cognitive Domain: Knowledge
Answer Location: Ethics Codes
Difficulty Level: Medium

7. Which of the following was a social psychological experiment that is considered
ethically questionable because of the emotional and psychological risk incurred by
participants?
A. Milgram’s obedience study
B. Zimbardo’s prison experiment
C. Tuskegee Study
D. Nuremburg Study
Ans: B
Learning Objective: 1-2: How to think critically about research ethics, including
understanding and applying the ethical principles and standards of your discipline.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
donatrey Harvard University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
104
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
68
Documenten
371
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden

2,2

15 beoordelingen

5
2
4
1
3
3
2
1
1
8

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen