100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
College aantekeningen

Course notes Mind & Brain (840113-B-6)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
41
Geüpload op
13-02-2022
Geschreven in
2020/2021

These are notes from the lectures.












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
13 februari 2022
Aantal pagina's
41
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
College aantekeningen
Docent(en)
Jeroen stekelenburg
Bevat
Alle colleges

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Brain part
Lecture 1
Chapters
4: The brain and behavior
5: sensation and perception
6: consciousness
8: memory

Organization ‘Brain’
- 7 lectures and 3 practicals

Lecture 1: introduction to CNS
Lecture 2: neuroanatomy
- Practical 1: neuroanatomy
Lecture 3: perception
Lecture 4: consciousness
- Practical 2: computer experiments
Lecture 5: memory
Lecture 6: Emotion
- Practical 3: exam questions
Lecture 7: Free will? (together with dr. Dooremalen)

How to pass ‘brain’?
- ‘brain’ difficult? Not necessarily!
- But a lot of new and often detailed information
- Many theories on different subjects
- Many new concepts and facts
- Adequate number of pages in the book (=200)
- Attend lectures/practicals
- Start with reading the book one week before the exam? Fail is guaranteed! Keep up
with reading.
- Just reading the book/slides? Fail is guaranteed! Learn by heart!

Study load ‘Brain’
- Study load 3 ects = 48 hours
- 7 lectures + 3 practicals = 20 hours
- The general standard is five pages per hour = = 40 hours
- Studying the slides = 20 hours
- Total workload for Brain = 80 hours
- Lectures (but not practicals) are recorded: available on BB 2 weeks before exam

Lecture 1: Introduction to Cognitive neuroscience
Cognitive neuroscience:
- Study of mind and behavior

What is behavior? Any form of ACTION in a living organism
- Directly observable actions and responses: including blushing, sweating, etc.

,What is the mind? Internal states and processes that are not directly observable
- Must be inferred from observable, measurable responses
- E.g. Loneliness: we are unable to see feelings of loneliness. Instead we must infer
how others feel from behavior and verbal statements.
 we study both, the relation between the to, behavior and mind.

What does a cognitive neuroscientist study?
- How does our brain work?
- We study mental functions that we use everyday such as perception, thinking,
decision making, action, language, attention, emotion, motivation, learning and
memory.

How can we study the brain and its functions?
- Correlation research
- Experimental research  most of the times this
- Tools and strategies to measure the brain function and cognition

Correlational research:
- Measures association between two variables
 for example: a relation between the variables length and weight of people, or the
number of cigarettes per day and lifespan.
- Scatterplot: a graph that shows the correlation between two variables
 direction of relationship: positive or negative
 strength of relationship: the closer the correlation coefficient gets to 1 (+ or -), the
stronger the relationship

Correlation does not equal causation  problem!
(1) What causes what?
More time spend outside  increased feeling of well being
More time spent outside - increased feeling of well being ??
More time spent outside  increased feeling of well being  ??
What causes what?

(2) The relationship between two variables may be coincidental
(3) The relationship between two variables may be influenced by other variables which
are lurking in the background
 correlation between color of the grass and ice-cream sales
 the more the yellow the grass gets the more ice cream is sold
 sunshine is the cause

Correlation research does not provide information about causality (whether A causes B),
whereas Experimental research does.

Experimental research  what we do for 99%
- The researcher manipulates just one aspect of the situation while the rest stays the
same. The effect of this manipulation on behavior is then measured. This approach
does allow inferences about causality

, - The experimenter designs a task for the subject and manipulates one aspect
- The experimenter measures the behavior and/or brain activity of the subject
- The experimenter relates the behavior and brain activity to the experimental
manipulation

Two flavours
1. Between subjects design: each subject participates in only one condition
 example: does alcohol increase reaction time?
 random assignment of subjects to conditions  initial equivalence
 group A: 5 glasses of wine and group B: 5 glasses of water  independent variable
(experimental manipulation)  we measure reaction time in a car (dependent
variable, measurement)

2. Within subject design: each subject receives all conditions
 example: is the reaction time different for auditory and visual stimuli?
 in one subject  condition A: visual stimuli , condition B: auditory stimuli
(independent variable, experimental manipulation)  we measure reaction time
(dependent variable, measurement)

We are going to do an experiment now:
Read out the words as fast as possible
Name the color
 what we can do now  measure the reaction time  but it in a diagram  reaction time
for the second time was way longer  EUREKA!

Stroop effect  you cannot help reading  there is an inbalance  first come up with a
solution that’s why it takes more time
- Questions to you about the design of the stroop experiment:
- Was this a between or within subject design?  within
- What was the independent variable (what was varied?)  what you have to say out
loud, the tasks was varied
- What was the dependent variable (what was measured?)  the reaction time the
total time that you were busy reading out.

Tools to measure brain function and cognition.

Tools to measure the brain and its function
Behavioral level
- Reaction times
- Eye tracking  see what are you looking at  measure of attention

Tools to measure brain function:
Neuronal level
- fMRI: Functional magnetic resonance imaging  brain is scanned in 3D fashion 
where your brain is active  indirect measure  we measure oxygen in your blood

,  drawback of this method: it is very expensive to buy and to use + we don’t know
when the activity in the brain is we only know where. This is because the blood flow
is really slow.
 high spacial resolution but poor temporal resolution
 so, for that we need another method
- EEG: electroencephalography
 we know when it is happening, differences between conditions, when the brain is
processing stimuli, but not where.
 we measure the electrical activity
 great temporal resolution but poor spacial resolution
- ECoG: electrocorticography
 using electrotes and putting them directly on the brain
 brain has to be cracked open, if someone is in surgery only
 place sensors and then have a good spacial and temporal resolution to measure
brain function  only seldemly that we can use that
- MEG: Magnetoencephalography
 if the brain cells are active they admit electrical activity  can measure that with
EEG
 but the brain cells also admit magnetic activity  They are little batteries and
magnets.  you can measure the magnetic outflows
 disadvantage: very expensive
 positive side: it combines the good stuff of fMRI and EEG  so you have a high
spacial resolution and a high temporal resolution  we know where and when in the
brain!

Could also do; look at your heart rate
 interval between heart rates; heart rate fiability
 it is not always the same when you measure the heart rate; it is variable which is good!

- ECG: electrocardiography  a task, high work load, mental effort  heart variability
is declining  can use as a measure
- EMG: electromyography (muscle activity)  can measure the emotions directly in
the face
- SCR: Skin conductance response  sensors on the fingers, measures sweat response
and arousal  is often used in lie detection  lying is an internal state we cannot
see that but can try to figure it out with ECG, EMG SCR.

Single cell recording (in animals)
 they stick a needle in the brain  can measure the activity of one specific cell  subject
sees something  is the cell responding or not?

Animal lesion studies
Logic of Lesion studies:
- Damaged area plays a role in accomplishing whatever task is deficient after the lesion
 so, you teach an animal a certain task  than destroy a particular part of the
brain where you think the animal needs in order to do that task  and if the animal
€3,79
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
fienwakim25
4,0
(1)

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
fienwakim25 Tilburg University
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
2
Documenten
4
Laatst verkocht
2 jaar geleden

4,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen