100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Thinking through communication_sarah Trenholm_open book exam Hogeschool Utrecht

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
21
Geüpload op
17-01-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

In this summary, I talk about each key term, blue and italic ones. The summary works well for the cntrl+F function. Besides this, the document also gives examples of certain theories and phenomenons.











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Nee
Wat is er van het boek samengevat?
1 t/m 9
Geüpload op
17 januari 2022
Aantal pagina's
21
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Principles of communication

Communication is the process of generating meaning by receiving and sending verbal and nonverbal
symbols and signs that are influenced by multiple contexts.

Chapter 1: the communication tradition

Studying rhetoric in ancient Greece

Rhetoric: the study of communication

Rhetorics: teachers of communications

Plato: a Greek philosopher

Aristotle was his student and attended his academy

Three pillars of persuasion

Ethos: credibility, personal character

Pathos: emotions, the ability to arouse emotions

Logos: reasoning, the wording and logic of the message



The classical period (500 B.C. – 400 C.E.)

Corax and Tisias: two Sicilian Greek rhetoricians

Sophists: professional speech teachers who advertised their services by posting notices in public
places where they could find an audience

Cicero: a prominent roman politician

- Helped to create the five canons of rhetoric

The five canons of rhetoric (table 1.2)

1) Invention: research as much as you can
2) Arrangement: arrange ideas for maximum impact
3) Style: select and arrange wording carefully
4) Memory: remember what you want to say
5) Delivery: nonverbal -> the way you deliver the content

Quintilian: the last great classical theorist

- Stressed the ethical dimension of communication when he defined rhetoric as the study of
“the good man speaking well”.

Medieval (400-1400) and renaissance (1400-1600) communication

Augustine: major Christian theorist -> argued that it would be foolish for truth to take its stand
unarmed against falsehood.

- Believed people communicate through signs: something that causes something else to come
into the mind as a consequence of itself.

,Natural signs: are created by God (smoke, which causes to one think of fire)

Conventional signs: are arbitrarily created by humans (the spoken or written word)

The modern period (1600-1900)

Four approaches in the modern period

1) Classical approach: recover the insights of the great classical rhetoricians, adapting them to
modern times
2) Psychological/epistemological approach: investigating the relationship of communication and
thought, trying to understand in a scientific way how people influence each other through
speech
3) Belletristic approach: focusses on writing and speaking as art forms
4) Elocutionary approach: designed elaborate systems of instruction to improve speakers (non)
verbal presentation



Francis Bacon (1561-1626): identified four ‘idols’ or distortions that get in the way of clear thinking

Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and John Locke (1632-1704): mistrusted normal uses of rhetoric -> truth
can only be obtained through discourse that is grounded in an understanding of human rationality

George Campbell (1719-1796): combined these ideas of modern thinkers with the teachings of
classical rhetoricians.

Contemporary Period: Communication today

Two approaches to the study of communication:

- Scientific method: a belief in controlled laboratory experimentation and careful, objective
measurement.
- The rhetorical tradition: using the historical and critical methods of the humanities in their
studies, which are symbolic activity shapes public response to political and ethical issues ->
rhetoric remains a human discipline



Chapter 2: definitions, models and perspectives

A product or phenomenon can have different kinds of definitions that can be correct (example:
phone can be a product to communicate, a design of a product, or maintaining relationships)

Definition: clarifies concepts by indicating their boundaries

Objective processes of discovery: a single correct definition exists for everything

Subjective process of construction: assume that most of the things we try to define are human
constructions

Breadth: how broad or narrow we want our communication to be

Intentionality: does the sender always consciously have to communicate in order to participate in
communication?

, Sender-based: the person sending out information, either intentional or not, is the one
communicating

Receiver-based: the person observing or hearing information is the one communicator

Spoken symbolic interaction: the way people create common meaning by using symbols (words) and
share that meaning with each other

Nonverbal interaction: unspoken and often unintentional behavior. Can be accompanied by verbal
communication to create a fully interdependent meaning.



Communication sub-fields:

- Interpersonal communication: how people use the one-to-one interaction to build
relationships
- Small group communication: how small collections of people can work together to discuss
and solve a problem
- Public communication: how public speakers sway audiences
- Intercultural communication: how people from different cultures, values, understand and
accept each other
- Organizational communication: how communication plays out in business and industry
settings
- Mass communication: how messages are broadcast to large mass audiences
(newspaper/tv/radio)

Mediated interaction: messaging (E-mail, social media, whatsapp) via indirect sources where
individuals can work together as well as co-group communication



Theory: how I think things work. Proposition thus may not always be true (can be proven by testing)
-> commonly remain unproven and thus does not truly represent reality

Model: abstract representation of a process, description, of its structure or function. Models are
representations and cannot capture a process in its entirety.

- Can be useful to help us understand how a process works.

Why: trying to make sense on processes

How: explanatory (explain the process), predictive (to test a process), control
function (how to modify/control a process)

What: make assumptions, different ways to model a process, models are
incomplete by definition


Models can serve:

- Explanatory functions: dividing a process into constituent parts and showing us how the parts
are connected
- Predictive functions: allow “if….then” questions (traffic simulations)
- Control functions: show how to control a process
€8,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
LiekeKok2000
2,0
(1)

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
LiekeKok2000 Hogeschool Utrecht
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
11
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
7
Documenten
4
Laatst verkocht
11 maanden geleden

2,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen