100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

2.3 Problem 3 Summary

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
3
Pagina's
8
Geüpload op
25-11-2021
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Summary of 2.3 Problem 3 Literature and articles










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
25 november 2021
Bestand laatst geupdate op
26 november 2021
Aantal pagina's
8
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

2.3 Problem 3
Toward the Science of Psychology
 Primarily part of philosophy
Hartley
 Based his psychology on principles of philosophy
o Wanted to create psych. That combined philosophy and physiology, but
philosophy came on top
Gall
 Founder of Neuroscience (brain is the seat of the soul)
 Brain is a specific organ of mental activity
o Study of human nature should begin with functions of the brain giving rise
to thought and action, not abstract and introspective inquiries into mind
 Reacted to French empiricism and associationism
 Localisation of function- each proposed faculty is innate and in a particular
region of the brain
 Since brains of species differ, so should the corresponding faculties
o Carried out comparative anatomical studies to support this
 Adopted a different, less time-consuming methodology: lead to the pseudoscience
of phrenology
o Assumed well-developed mental faculties corresponded to well-developed
parts of brain
o Organs corresponding to these faculties would be larger than organs to
corresponding less well-developed faculties
 Size of the organs would show as bumps on the skull overlying the
larger organs
o Certain traits would cause certain bumps on the skull
 Can observe individual personality via cranial observation
 Nativistic approach
 Compared humans with other animals
 Materialistic
 Behaviouristic (not introspectionistic)
o Studied people via the bumps and behaviours
 Psychology of individual differences
 Later studies showed Gall correct in that different parts of the brain responsible
for different mental processes
 Scientific experiments found Gall specific locations were faulty, and that size of
brain corresponds to faculty strength is foundation-less
 Flourens- ridiculed phrenology, argued cerebral hemisphere is unit containing no
specialised organs for specialised faculties
Flourens
 Cartesian dualist
 Soul resides in cerebral hemisphere and is unitary- action of hemispheres
must be so too
 Advocated idea of mass action- cerebrum is a single organ with a single
function- thought- acts as a mass
Bell
 Based works on post-mortem dissections
 Distinguishes 2 sets of nerves at base of spinal column
o Suggested one carried into to brain, other carried info from brain to
muscles


Emerging Reflex Theory of the Brain
Gristch and Hitzig- electrical excitation of the cerebrum elicits movement
 different parts of the brain, when stimulated, regulate different movements
 new phrenology formed
o some parts of brain receive sensations, others govern specific actions,
association of sensation and action produces behaviour

,  Brain is complex reflex machine with cerebral hemispheres providing
associative connections between incoming stimuli and outgoing responses

Experimental Psychology
 Studied normal human mind
o Regarded individual differences as error variance (should be minimised
by experimental control
Donders
 Dutch psychologist
 Time between stimulus and response can be used objectively to quantify
speed of mental processes
 Simple reaction time- how long it takes someone to respond to a single
stimulus eg. turning on light bulb
 Compound reaction time- how long it takes someone to respond to more
complicated stimuli eg. having 2 lights
o Subject must make a judgement
 Compound reaction time- simple reaction time= mental judgement
 Mental chronometry- the method founded by Donders, which provides an
objective way to measure physiological and mental processes that can’t be
directly observed
o Quantitative method
 Brought the mind into the laboratory
Fechner
 Showed Kant’s assumptions (mind can be subjected to neither experiment nor
mathematical analysis) to be false
 Content of consciousness can be manipulated by controlling the stimuli
individuals expose to
o Makes mental experiments possible
 Can mathematically relate stimulus magnitude with resulting sensation
o Strength of sensation (S) is a function of stimulus strength (R): S=k log
R
 K= constant particular to sense modality
 Work motivated by mind-body problem
 Psychophysics

Mental testing
 Fundamental for founding of applied psychology
 Invested for public education
 Concerned with measuring individual differences: average human mind, but
no normal one
Galton
 British ;)
 Aimed to measure intelligence (the master mental ability)
o Looked at exam scores
 Devised Pearson product-moment correlation
o Found strong correlation between exam grades, suggesting intelligence
is a single mental ability
 Galton followers believe most intelligence can be accounted for by single
psychometric factor, g
 Critics- intelligence is composed of multiple skills
 Measured intelligence based on methods from British Empiricism
 Studied ordinary people, not highly educated
 Show that intelligence is heritable as are other physical traits
 Pushes eugenics
 Interested in genetic variation

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
lablyth Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
2489
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
374
Documenten
61
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

4,6

33 beoordelingen

5
23
4
7
3
2
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen