100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Research Workshop: Survey; Complete exam preparation

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
25
Geüpload op
21-09-2021
Geschreven in
2021/2022

This document contains full lecture notes and literature review that you need to know for the exam. I got an 8. Everything is clearly decribed, the book chapters which are needed for the exam are covered.











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Ja
Geüpload op
21 september 2021
Aantal pagina's
25
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

RESEARCH WORKSHOP – SURVEY COMPLETE LECTURE NOTES


WEEK 1
Fowler (2014): chapter 2, 6 and7

Lecture 1
Valid answers? Proper questions!

GOALS RESEARCH WORKSHOP: SURVEY

 You can justify the use of survey methods for research
 You get practical experience with the empirical cycle
 You get to apply quantitative research methods and techniques related to survey
research
 You practice with writing a research plan + report
 You can operationalize and measure constructs within the context of a survey study

What is survey research?
-> Produce statistics about target population

Why survey research?




TWO INFERENCES: An inference is an idea
I. The answers given by your participants measure the desired concepts or conclusion that's
II. Your sample reflects the population you aim to study drawn from evidence

TWO TYPES OF ERRORS:
1. Random

COMMON SOURCES OF RANDOM ERROR IN SURVEY RESEARCH:
 Ambiguous wording of questions
 Deviations from the script by the interviewer
 Misunderstanding on the part of the interviewee

,  Memory problems on the part of the interviewee

2. Systematic
 Social Desirability




GETTING ANSWERS: SOCIAL DESIRABILITY
-> Make undesirable answer less threatening:
 Everybody makes mistakes in their lives. What about you? Did you commit any serious
crimes in the past that vou may or may not regret?
 Have you ever made any of these transgressions? (check all that apply):
 Wolf-whistling
 Ignoring a homeless person begging for attention
 Hitting a person
 Stealing
 Murder
-> Social desirability varies between groups
 How much money do you earn?
 How often do you get completely drunk?
 How many sexual partners have you had?

"The quality of data will be no better than the most error-prone feature of the survey design"
(Fowler, 2014, p.6)

SURVEY METHODOLOGY IN PRACTICE:

1. Research objective
 the aim of the study is to investigate to what extent demographic characteristics are
associated to how people describe the taste of cilantro
2. List of variables
 Taste of cilantro
 Demographic characteristics (age [ratio], sex [nominal], ancestry[nominal] )
3. Analysis plan

DEVELOPING AND EVALUATING QUESTIONNAIRES

four phases by Fowler (2004):
I. Preliminary question design steps
II. Presurvey evaluation

, III. Design, format, and layout
IV. Field pre-test

EXAMPLE:
I. Preliminary question design steps:
1. Focus groups (e.g., terminology: cilantro or coriander?)
2. Drafting questions

COMMON MISTAKES
 Ambiguous terms: 'often', 'regularly', frequently
 Long questions
 Double-barrelled questions: may be different answers to each part
 Very general questions: because they lack a frame of reference
 Leading questions: hinting at a preferred response
 Negative terms: not', 'never' - especially double negatives
 Technical terms: (jargon and acronyms)

OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS
 No/less bias from response options
 Increased validity
 Tiresome for a respondent
 Explorative questions
 Unanticipated responses
 Very important to clarify the question
 Length in centimeters
 Age in years
 Transformations after data collection/ lot of different responses
 Sometimes answer categories are preferred
 Less detailed, but less tiresome



THE FALLIBLE BRAIN
 How often in the last two months did you visit a bar?
 How often in the last two months did you take an exam?
 How often in the last two months did you go online to find health information?

 Over - and under-reporting
 Media use: often over-reported
 Salient behaviours more accurately reported

INCLUDING "DON'T KNOW" AS A RESPONSE OPTION
-> If you include it, people use it
 If you need people to choose one or the other: do not include don't know
 If it is possible that people lack the knowledge required to answer a particular question:
including don't know can be sensible

Is there an alternative solution?


 Routing - filter questions
o Some questions are not relevant to every interviewee

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
studentstudyhelp Universiteit van Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
31
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
29
Documenten
7
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

5,0

2 beoordelingen

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen