100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary EU Decision Making

Beoordeling
5,0
(1)
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
60
Geüpload op
09-05-2021
Geschreven in
2020/2021

Mandatory reading , lectures and workshops












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Heel boek samengevat?
Ja
Geüpload op
9 mei 2021
Aantal pagina's
60
Geschreven in
2020/2021
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

EU DECISION MAKING &
JUDICIAL REMEDIES
(The Hague University of Applied Sciences)
2020-21

Table of Contents

Lecture 1: Procedures and Competence....................................................................................4
Governance in the EU – the Community Method (Recap)....................................................4
Legislative acts........................................................................................................................4
The Consent Procedure..........................................................................................................4
The Consultation Procedure...................................................................................................5
The EU & its Member States: division of competence..........................................................6
Competence division between the EU and its Member States.............................................7
The Community method – criticism.......................................................................................8
Alternative methods of governance for the EU: The Open Method of Coordination (OMC)
................................................................................................................................................8
Example for soft governance: The EU framework for National Roma Integration Strategies
(2011)...................................................................................................................................10
Lecture 2: Delegation of Rulemaking Powers in the EU..........................................................11
Rulemaking Powers in the EU..............................................................................................11
The Notion of ‘Delegation of Powers’..................................................................................11
Rulemaking Powers by the European Commission..............................................................13
Competences and Powers....................................................................................................16
Institutional Balance.............................................................................................................16
Lecture 3: The Preliminary Ruling Procedure in EU Law..........................................................17
Recalling the General Principle of ‘Supremacy’ in EU Law..................................................17
Recalling the General Principle of ‘Direct Effect’ in EU Law................................................17
Foundations..........................................................................................................................18
What is Preliminary Ruling?.................................................................................................18
Referable Questions I...........................................................................................................19
Referable Questions II..........................................................................................................20
The Doctrine of ‘Acte Clair’..................................................................................................20
Legal Nature of Preliminary Rulings I...................................................................................21
Legal Nature of Preliminary Ruling – A Common Law Perspective......................................22


1

, Legal Nature of Preliminary Ruling – A Civil Law Perspective..............................................22
Conclusion............................................................................................................................23
Workshop.............................................................................................................................23
PART II: WORKSHOP.................................................................................................................25
Case 283/81, CILFIT et al v. Ministry of Health....................................................................25
Lecture 4: Enforcement Actions against Member States of the Union...................................26
Setting the Scene..................................................................................................................26
Recalling Principle of Sincere Cooperation..........................................................................26
Recalling the Principle of Conferred Powers........................................................................26
Role of the European Commission in Infringement Procedure of EU Law..........................27
Nature and Function of Art. 258 TFEU.................................................................................27
Infringement Procedure of EU Law......................................................................................27
The Commission’s Discretion...............................................................................................27
The Commission’s Reasoned Opinion..................................................................................28
Exceptions to Access............................................................................................................29
Consequences of a Commission’s reasoned opinion...........................................................29
Types of breach by Member States of EU Law....................................................................29
Interim Measures.................................................................................................................31
Workshop............................................................................................................................31
Lecture 5: Actions for Annulment (Part I)................................................................................33
What happens when the Union oversteps its competences?.............................................33
The CJEU – Jurisdiction.........................................................................................................33
Actions for Annulment – Introduction.................................................................................33
Why Having Actions for Annulment in the EU system?.......................................................34
Two main elements of actions for annulment.....................................................................34
Admissibility – The Issue of Locus Standi – Which applicants can bring an action for
annulment?..........................................................................................................................35
Admissibility – acts of which institutions are reviewable?..................................................36
Admissibility – When is an act intended to produce legal effect vis-à-vis third parties?....37
Admissibility – acts of which institutions are renewable?...................................................37
Admissibility – which acts are not-reviewable?...................................................................38
Admissibility – to sum up: which acts are reviewable?.......................................................39
Admissibility – the time limit................................................................................................39
Effects of a well-founded action for annulment..................................................................39
Lecture 6: Action for Annulment – Non-privilege applicants..................................................40
Admissibility - Locus standi for non-privileged applicants...................................................40

2

, Natural or Legal Persons......................................................................................................41
Locus standi for non-privileged applicants – 4 possible scenarios under Article 263 TFEU 41
Scenario 1: The act is addressed to the applicant................................................................41
When is a Union act considered “NOT addressed to the applicant”? (Second and third
scenario)...............................................................................................................................41
Acts NOT addressed to the applicant (Second and third scenario).....................................42
The concept of “direct concern” and individual concern”...................................................42
The Plaumann test...............................................................................................................43
Scenario 4: The act is a regulatory act and it does NOT entail any implementing measures
..............................................................................................................................................44
To sum up: locus standi for non-privileged applicants – 4 possible scenarios....................45
Admissibility criteria for natural & legal persons – are the conditions too strict or too
strictly interpreted by the CJEU?..........................................................................................45
Grounds for annulment – 1. Lack of competence or authority...........................................46
Grounds for annulment – 2. Misuse of powers...................................................................46
Grounds for annulment – 3. Infringement of an essential procedural requirement..........46
Grounds for annulment – 4. Infringement of the Treaties or any other rule of law relating
to their application...............................................................................................................46
Workshop.............................................................................................................................47
Lecture 7: Recap.......................................................................................................................48
Lecture 1: Competence & Procedures.................................................................................48
Lecture 5: Actions for Annulment (I)....................................................................................50
Lecture 6 – Actions for Annulment (II).................................................................................53




3

, Lecture 1: Procedures and Competence

Governance in the EU – the Community Method (Recap)

 The Community Method is the usual decision-making method in the EU,
characterized by:
o The European Commission’s role in legislative initiative
o The Council’s role in decision-making
o Involvement of the European Parliament in decision-making at different
degrees depending on the decision-making procedure:
 Ordinary legislative procedure
 Consent procedure
 Consultation procedure
o The role of the CJEU in providing judicial remedies



Legislative acts

 What are legislative acts?
 Art 289 (3) TFEU:
 Legal acts adopted by legislative procedure shall constitute legislative acts.

 The ordinary legislative procedure – recap
 Article 289 TFEU:
 “The ordinary legislative procedure shall consist in the joint adoption by the
European Parliament and the Council of a regulation, directive or decision
on a proposal from the Commission.”
 This procedure is defined in Article 294 TFEU.



The Consent Procedure

 The Council must obtain the consent of the European Parliament before
adopting a proposed secondary EU legislation
 The European Parliament has the right to veto the proposed legislation
 Some examples:
 Membership applications to the EU – Article 49 TEU
 Adoption of the multiannual financial framework – Article 312 TFEU
 Approval of anti-discrimination action – Article 19(1) TFEU

 Example 1:
 Article 312(2) TFEU



4

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle reviews worden weergegeven
1 jaar geleden

5,0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
anmolzsidhu Anmol
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
14
Lid sinds
6 jaar
Aantal volgers
11
Documenten
14
Laatst verkocht
3 jaar geleden

4,3

3 beoordelingen

5
2
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen