100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

CIC2601 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 6 August 2025

Beoordeling
4,3
(3)
Verkocht
19
Pagina's
13
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
19-07-2025
Geschreven in
2024/2025

CIC2601 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) 2025 - DUE 6 August 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us.. Question Question 1 [20 marks] The aim of this question is to allow you to demonstrate how digital technologies can be used to foster higher-order cognitive skills. Task: How can you ensure that the use of digital technologies in the classroom supports the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills in learners? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Integration of Digital Technologies Clearly describes how digital technologies are used to foster higher-order cognitive skills. Describes the use of digital technologies with minor details missing. Mentions the use of digital technologies but lacks clarity on fostering cognitive skills. Vague mention of digital technologies with little relevance to cognitive skills. No mention of digital technologies or irrelevant use. Development of Critical Thinking Provides a detailed explanation of how digital technologies support critical thinking. Explains support for critical thinking with some details missing. Basic explanation of support for critical thinking. Vague explanation of support for critical thinking. No explanation of support for critical thinking. Development of Problem-Solving Skills Thoroughly explains how digital technologies enhance problem-solving skills. Explains enhancement of problem-solving skills with some details missing. Basic explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. Vague explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. No explanation of enhancement of problem-solving skills. Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Question 2 [20 marks] In this question, we encourage you to critically evaluate digital technology tools and their relevance in teaching. Task: Select a digital tool that you have learned about in this module. Evaluate its effectiveness in the classroom, considering its strengths and limitations. How would you recommend improving it for educational use? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Evaluation of Digital Tool Clearly evaluates the digital tool, considering its strengths and limitations. Evaluates the digital tool with some details missing. Basic evaluation of the digital tool. Vague evaluation of the digital tool. No evaluation of the digital tool. Strengths and Limitations Provides detailed and relevant strengths and limitations of the digital tool. Provides strengths and limitations with some details missing. Basic strengths and limitations provided. Vague strengths and limitations. No strengths and limitations provided. Recommendations for Improvement Thoroughly explains recommendations for improving the digital tool for educational use. Explains recommendations with some details missing. Basic recommendations provided. Vague recommendations. No recommendations provided. Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** Question 3 [10 marks] This question promotes critical thinking about potential barriers and solutions, whether they are technological, pedagogical, or institutional. Task: What are the key challenges you foresee in integrating digital technologies into classroom instruction, and how might you address them? Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Identification of Challenges Clearly identifies key challenges in integrating digital technologies. Identifies challenges with some details missing. Basic identification of challenges. Vague identification of challenges. No identification of challenges. Solutions to Challenges Provides detailed and practical solutions to address the challenges. Provides solutions with some details missing. Basic solutions provided. Vague solutions. No solutions provided. CIC2601-25-Y

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak








Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Gekoppeld boek

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 juli 2025
Aantal pagina's
13
Geschreven in
2024/2025
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

CIC2601
Assignment 3 2025
Unique number:

Due Date: 6 August 2025
QUESTION 1

Using Digital Technologies to Foster Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills in
the Classroom

1. Introduction

The 21st-century classroom is defined by the integration of digital technologies that enhance
learning. However, simply using technology is not enough. Teachers must ensure that these
tools promote deeper understanding, critical engagement, and problem-solving ability.
According to Gunter and Gunter (2015), effective use of digital tools can support learner-
centered strategies that enhance higher-order cognitive skills such as analysis, evaluation,
and creation. This essay explores how digital technologies can be implemented meaningfully
to develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills in learners.



2. Strategies to Support Critical Thinking Through Technology

2.1. Inquiry-Based Learning with Internet Tools Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
€2,65
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:
Gekocht door 19 studenten

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

Alle 3 reviews worden weergegeven
4 maanden geleden

5 maanden geleden

5 maanden geleden

4,3

3 beoordelingen

5
2
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
0
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
149208
Lid sinds
7 jaar
Aantal volgers
35996
Documenten
4352
Laatst verkocht
3 uur geleden

4,2

13562 beoordelingen

5
7808
4
2689
3
1791
2
455
1
819

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen