, PLS2607 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester
1 2025 - DUE 7 April 2025 ;100% trusted, comprehensive
and complete reliable solution with clear explanation
2 ANSWERS PROVIDED
David Hume declared that anything that hints of metaphysics
(i.e., the study of that which transcends physics) should “be cast
into the flames” (An Enquiry, 12). Explain why Hume and the
Logical Positivists viewed metaphysics unfavourably
Title: Why David Hume and the Logical Positivists Viewed
Metaphysics Unfavourably
Introduction Metaphysics, the branch of philosophy concerned
with explaining the fundamental nature of being and the world
that encompasses it, has long been a central theme in
philosophical discourse. However, not all philosophers have
regarded it positively. Notably, David Hume and the Logical
Positivists shared a critical stance towards metaphysical inquiry.
Hume, an 18th-century Scottish Enlightenment thinker, was
deeply skeptical of metaphysical speculation. The Logical
Positivists, a group of early 20th-century philosophers primarily
associated with the Vienna Circle, further developed this
skepticism into a formal philosophical position. This essay seeks
to explore why Hume and the Logical Positivists viewed
metaphysics unfavourably, comparing and contrasting their
reasoning and evaluating the philosophical implications of their
positions.
1 2025 - DUE 7 April 2025 ;100% trusted, comprehensive
and complete reliable solution with clear explanation
2 ANSWERS PROVIDED
David Hume declared that anything that hints of metaphysics
(i.e., the study of that which transcends physics) should “be cast
into the flames” (An Enquiry, 12). Explain why Hume and the
Logical Positivists viewed metaphysics unfavourably
Title: Why David Hume and the Logical Positivists Viewed
Metaphysics Unfavourably
Introduction Metaphysics, the branch of philosophy concerned
with explaining the fundamental nature of being and the world
that encompasses it, has long been a central theme in
philosophical discourse. However, not all philosophers have
regarded it positively. Notably, David Hume and the Logical
Positivists shared a critical stance towards metaphysical inquiry.
Hume, an 18th-century Scottish Enlightenment thinker, was
deeply skeptical of metaphysical speculation. The Logical
Positivists, a group of early 20th-century philosophers primarily
associated with the Vienna Circle, further developed this
skepticism into a formal philosophical position. This essay seeks
to explore why Hume and the Logical Positivists viewed
metaphysics unfavourably, comparing and contrasting their
reasoning and evaluating the philosophical implications of their
positions.
