100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary Automatism Scenario Plan

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
2
Geüpload op
28-07-2024
Geschreven in
2023/2024

A clearly structured automatism scenario plan. Used for WJEC exam but applicable for other exam boards. Cases are included. A* standard.

Instelling
Vak








Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
28 juli 2024
Aantal pagina's
2
Geschreven in
2023/2024
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Automatism

 Applicable if D’s act was encouraged by an external cause.
 Defined in the case of Bratty v AG for Northern Ireland as “an act
done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such
as a spasm, a reflex action or convulsion; or an act done by
a person who is not conscious of what he is doing such as an
act done whilst suffering from concussion or whilst
sleepwalking.
 In the Hill v Baxter, a plea of automatism was successful where the
D had been attacked by a swarm of bees.

Actions must be completely involuntary

 AG’s Reference (No. 2 of 1992) – Lorry driver crashed into some cars
on the hard shoulder. He raised the defence of automatism on the
basis that he was ‘driving without awareness’ induced by repetitive
visual stimulus. The defence was not available because reduced or
impaired control is not enough for a defence of automatism. There
must be a ‘total destruction of voluntary control’.

The cause must be external

 R v Wholley – D sneezed causing him to lose control of his steering.
His lorry bumped into the car in front which in turn led to a domino
crash between 7 cars ahead of him. Automatism was allowed
because the attack of sneezing amount to an involuntary action.
 R v T – D was raped and suffered PTSD. Due to this, she committed
a crime. Exceptional stress can be an external factor that can
cause automatism.

Is it likely that D will be able to use the defence?

 The defence of automatism has been known to have rather
harsh application on times.
 In Broome v Perkins, D was in a hyperglycaemic state and drove
home from work erratically, causing significant damage to his car.
He could remember nothing about the journey, but the court held
that because it was a familiar journey, someone in his state should
have been able to get home safely. He could not use the defence.

Self-Induced Automatism

 If D knowingly puts themself in a position of automatism,
then the defence will fail.
 Bailey – D was a diabetic who failed to eat enough after taking
insulin. D became aggressive and hit V over the head with an iron
€4,14
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
eleanortrend

Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
eleanortrend A Level Notes
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
5
Lid sinds
1 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
21
Laatst verkocht
7 maanden geleden

0,0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen