PEC-07-1600
“THE NEED OFR PATIENT EDUCATION. OPINIONS AND ATTITUDES ON HEROIN
ADDICTION: CHANGES IN ITALY OVER TEN YEARS (1995-2005)”
Original Submission
Reviewer Pieter J C Daniels
Reviewer o Accept
Recommendation o Accept with minor correction
Term: o Accept with major correction
X Reject
Overall reviewer Give score between 0 and 100 for total article:
Manuscript Rating 20
Comment to Editor: Review form:
* please rate the manuscript on the following criteria
(rate separately, using 4 = excellent, 3 = good, 2 = fair, 1 = poor, NA
= not applicable):
1…. literature review
1…. appropriateness of interventions
1….. soundness of methodology
2….. organization/writing style
3….. innovativeness/creativity
2….. significance/contribution to our knowledge
1….. usefulness to practitioners
* Other confidential comments to the editor:
Comments to the
Authors: Stijl:
Het artikel is niet opgesteld volgens APA richtlijnen dat maakt het
minder goed/prettig leesbaar.
Literatuur review:
Ontbreekt.
Abstract:
De probleem stelling is vaag. Het objectives roept gelijk een vraag op.
Als er een kennisniveau vastgesteld wordt, bij welk niveau is er dan
“THE NEED OFR PATIENT EDUCATION. OPINIONS AND ATTITUDES ON HEROIN
ADDICTION: CHANGES IN ITALY OVER TEN YEARS (1995-2005)”
Original Submission
Reviewer Pieter J C Daniels
Reviewer o Accept
Recommendation o Accept with minor correction
Term: o Accept with major correction
X Reject
Overall reviewer Give score between 0 and 100 for total article:
Manuscript Rating 20
Comment to Editor: Review form:
* please rate the manuscript on the following criteria
(rate separately, using 4 = excellent, 3 = good, 2 = fair, 1 = poor, NA
= not applicable):
1…. literature review
1…. appropriateness of interventions
1….. soundness of methodology
2….. organization/writing style
3….. innovativeness/creativity
2….. significance/contribution to our knowledge
1….. usefulness to practitioners
* Other confidential comments to the editor:
Comments to the
Authors: Stijl:
Het artikel is niet opgesteld volgens APA richtlijnen dat maakt het
minder goed/prettig leesbaar.
Literatuur review:
Ontbreekt.
Abstract:
De probleem stelling is vaag. Het objectives roept gelijk een vraag op.
Als er een kennisniveau vastgesteld wordt, bij welk niveau is er dan
