Case uitwerking
Abortion Right
Beoordeling
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
5
Cijfer
A+
Geüpload op
07-01-2024
Geschreven in
2022/2023
The right to security of person. The judges held that the doctors did not violate any law because the codes that declared abortion as a criminal offence violate the women right to the security of persons. Health risks associated with pregnancy were also considered in this case where the life of the mother could be at risk due to the pregnancy. The constitution has the right to protect its citizen’s life through the bill of rights which states that every individual has the right to life. In the case of pregnancy, the mother’s life could be at great risk and the committee that is in charge of imposing the criminal code against abortion may overlook the health risk and restrict the mother from conducting an abortion.
Meer zien
Lees minder
Instelling
Vak
Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.
Geschreven voor
- Instelling
- Kent State University
- Vak
- BUSN3120
Alle documenten voor dit vak (16)
Documentinformatie
- Geüpload op
- 7 januari 2024
- Aantal pagina's
- 5
- Geschreven in
- 2022/2023
- Type
- Case uitwerking
- Docent(en)
- Professor yang
- Cijfer
- A+
Onderwerpen
-
abortion right
-
health risks
-
pregnancy
-
a case study of r v morgentaler 1988 1 scr
-
basic issues addressed in the case
-
the right to security of person
€7,01
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:
100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten
Maak kennis met de verkoper
kennethkaroki
