100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

OCR History revision notes: 'The Changing Nature of Warfare' Chapter 2 Unit 1 - Industrialisation and technology

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
5
Geüpload op
27-02-2023
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Key revision notes for unit 2.1, 'the impact of industrialisation and technology', from the OCR History course 'The Changing Nature of Warfare '.

Instelling
Vak









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
27 februari 2023
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Overig
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

2.1 The impact of industrialisation and technology
Industrialisation: “the development of large scale and developed industries which used machines in
factories to enable mass production, precision engineering, and technological innovation”

Mass production

French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars

 Industrial developments had a limited impact on the nature and outcome of the wars
o Few significant improvements in weapons available
o Industry had not yet brought about the large-scale production of weapons that
could bring about mass destruction
 However, the increased role of the state in taking over industry did see greater production
of weapons like artillery
o Battle of Wagram 1809: 500 cannons on both sides

The American Civil War

 The first war where outproducing the enemy = as important as fighting them
o Grant’s strategy of attrition relied on exploiting superior Union resources and
productive capacity, as the South could not hope to match them
 It was the industrial capacity of the North that decided the ultimate outcome
o In 1860 the North produced 97% of US firearms and 94% of its pig iron
o Overall the North had 10 times the productive capacity of the South
o Confederate productive capacity was impacted even further by the Union blockade
and Sherman’s 1864 march to the sea which targeted industrial centres
 This war was the first sign of industrialisation turning war into a contest of economic
strength

The Wars of Unification

 Mass production and the industrial strength of Prussia saw victory over the less industrially
and economically developed Austria
o Industrialisation = ability to equip entirety of Prussian forces with modern weaponry
such as the superior breech-loading Dreyse needle gun (marked change from the
Napoleonic Wars where only a select few ‘elite’ units in the British army were armed
with the Baker rifle)

The First World War

 Industrialisation ensured that war had a greater human cost
o Mass production of machine guns meant that a small number of soldiers could hold
territory and inflict large-scale casualties, such as the British at the 1914 Battle of
Mons
o Industrialisation saw the mass production of large artillery weapons and millions of
shells
 Battle of the Somme 1916: British fired over 1.5 million shells in a week-long
preliminary bombardment
 In 1916 Russia produced 4.5 million shells a month
 Mass production and the increase in industrial capacity meant WW1 lasted far longer than
the Wars of Unification

, o 3-year stalemate on Western Front caused by scale of defensive weaponry and
continuous supplying of armies on the front line
 War increasingly becoming a contest of economic strength by WW1
o Mass production meant competent economic organisation became increasingly
important. Germany’s war economy was not as strong or well managed as France
and Britain’s
 The Hindenburg Programme of 1916 was unrealistic and its production
targets were not met
o The Allies were able to produce far more tanks than the Germans
 By 1918 the Allies had produced hundreds of tanks compared to the
Germans’ 20
 At the Battle of Amiens (August 1918) Rawlinson achieved a breakthrough
using over 500 tanks
o Allied industrial output was over 3 times greater than that of the Central Powers

The Second World War

 Germany’s failure to win a quick war in Russia turned WW2 into a contest of rival economies
and productive capacity
o Soviet productive capacity was significantly larger than that of Germany; this
enabled a war of attrition which swallowed up vast amounts of German resources
o The German panzer was individually superior to the Soviet T-34, but the Soviets
were able to produce over 80,000 T-34 tanks
o The USSR’s ability to go on the counterattack in 1943 depended on mass production
of tanks and heavy artillery
 Germany was consistently outproduced by the Allies throughout the war
o Germany was behind in production of combat aircraft. By 1944:
 Germany was producing 40,000
 The British Empire was producing 47,000
 The USA was producing 114,000
o Mass production enabled Allies to maintain air supremacy and win the war in the
skies
 Mass production of landing craft enabled the Allies’ various amphibious landings, including
most importantly D-Day in June 1944

Precision engineering

Precision engineering enabled the development of new weapons technology, particularly through
the rifling of small arms and cannons & breech-loading technology

The Crimean War

 The British and French enjoyed overwhelming technological superiority over the Russians
thanks to more developed industry
o They possessed better artillery and rifles
o The Russians relied on the smoothbore musket, while the Allies used the rifle-
musket
 This was accurate up to 600 yards – 5x the range of Russian muskets
 Battle of Inkerman 1854: British infantry successfully repulsed Russian
frontal assaults using Lee Enfield rifles
€3,51
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten


Ook beschikbaar in voordeelbundel

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
lilyrandall University of Bristol
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
12
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
3
Documenten
9
Laatst verkocht
7 maanden geleden
Revision notes for top grades

In 2022 I achieved 3 A*s in A-level French, History, and English Literature, and am now studying history at the University of Bristol. I am selling simple but comprehensive notes that cover content explicitly detailed in exam board specifications, but which also include key facts and information that distinguished me as someone who researched beyond what was written in the textbook. My notes are logical, easy to understand and are formatted in a way that makes them easy to digest and remember. Feel free to send me a message!

Lees meer Lees minder
4,7

3 beoordelingen

5
2
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen