100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Samenvatting social dialogue met nota's uit de les

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
9
Pagina's
84
Geüpload op
18-01-2023
Geschreven in
2022/2023

Samenvatting van boek met slides ook inhoudstafel aanwezig, ook nota's uit les staan ertussen is volledig in het engels en er zitten ook visuele tekeningen in om het soms duidelijker te maken.












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
18 januari 2023
Aantal pagina's
84
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

1. Introduction
Social dialogue = attempt to pacify the employment relationship by institutionalizing the conflict

= attempt to rebalance unequal power relation through collective voice

= attempt to regulate the labor market, through collective bargaining

Employee & employer = connected
through employment relationship (kind
of contracts etc)




Social dialogue

- = an attempt to pacify the employment relationship by institutionalizing the conflict
- = an attempt to rebalance unequal power relation through collective voice
- = an attempt to regulate the labour market, through collective bargaining

2. Frames of references
= influences strongly how you perceive reality and how you act

Frame of reference = way in which a person perceives and interprets events by means of a
conceptual structure of generalizations or contexts, postulates about what is essential, assumptions
as to what is valuable, attitudes about what is possible, and ideas about what will work effectively

- Built on a series of assumptions
- Guides actors towards certain interventions and limits the possible interventions envisaged
by the actor

Most important differentiating factor  perception regarding the degree of divergence of interest
between employers and employees

,Ideology = set of beliefs and values that one wishes to spread and live by




2.1 One team: the unitarist view
employees and employers share the same interests

- a team working towards a common goal
o but they have different roles
- win-win for everybody

worker’s interest

- quite ambitious
- seek a kind of fulfilment, well-being and actualization
- develops the competences of the employee & that they can really use their talents to the
best of their ability

employer interest

- profit maximization
- having all their employees work to the best of their abilities, be creative and innovative &
provide high quality services
- management through consent
- ‘as a manager my door is always open’
o Not really open because they think conflict is a result of a miscommunication

,conflict

- abnormal
- conflict can and should be avoided
- attributed to individual misunderstandings & problems in communication
- in case of conflict  management should increase collaboration and understanding

voice

- direct, individual communication between the worker and his supervisor
- through direct consultations or open group formats
- individual voice is enough

trade unions

- troublemakers
- unnecessary given that interests are aligned
- no one best way to handle trade unions
o OR ignore them as much as possible
 Undermine their legitimacy without openly being confrontational
o OR incorporate trade unions
 Use them to better spread information

Power differences

- Unimportant
- Problems in power differences due to interpersonal relations or deficient leadership qualities
o Solved by management training, better human resource management &
organizational design

Role of the state

- Limited to protection of property & freedom of enterprise

Perspective mostly found in the discourse of many HR departments & HR literature

Scholars

- Mostly adhered to by industrial psychology, HR & organizational behavior scholars
- Keywords associated with unitarist view
o Employee commitment
o Employee engagement
o Organizational trust

Importance of trust

- Without it
o Many social interactions and cooperation would be seriously inhibited
- Gross majority of studies depart from a unitarist perspective in which trust is seen as the
normal state and conflict as being the result of misunderstandings or in other words a
pathology
- Trust is essential but is it

, o The normal state of things
o Something to be constructed and managed
o In the interest of the employer only

Critique

- Not realistic
o Conflicts are daily reality
o Ignores differences of interest and power
- Very individualist streak
o Ignores existence of any kind of collective interests of the employees
- Ignores the influence of context and institutions
- Main initiating actors is the management and the employer
- So a useful fiction
- Paternalistic

Examples

- Google
o Don’t be evil
o Do the right thing
o Gives their workers ample autonomy and nourishes a strong internal culture
o Through this policy, conflict does not exist in such a high-trust environment
 Could not avoid the emergence of conflict and collective organization at
Google
- Ford

Looking in a unitarist way

- Scientific management theory
o One-best way to organize production and the company
o Given the difference in competences between workers and managers, it are the
managers who will design this best way of doing things and the workers will execute
these prescribed tasks
- HRM
o Starts from the belief that by good procedures and work organization, employees
can find fulfilment and satisfaction in their jobs
o Open door policy signals that employees can always communicate their issues to
which a professional, fair and equitable HR department will respond

2.2 Two teams, the pluralist view
In any group there are subgroups with sometimes similar and sometimes diverging interests

- Work around common objectives BUT in same time have issues where their interests are
clearly different

Employee interest

- Beyond merely having an income
- Want to be heard (collectively) in the decision-making process

This pluralist perspective was for a long time the dominant approach to work and social dialogue

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
romanideprez Universiteit Gent
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
19
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
8
Documenten
2
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

4,0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen