100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Summary lecture notes Oncology

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
2
Pagina's
46
Geüpload op
27-09-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Summary lecture notes Oncology

Instelling
Vak











Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
27 september 2022
Aantal pagina's
46
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Oncology




Cancer epidermiology
Etiology: causes of cancer (risk factors)

Life-time-risk cancer (85yrs)
Females: 38%
Males: 45%

Why cancer epidemiology?
 To obtain knowledge about trends in incidence and survival/mortality after cancer in order to
a. Make informed decisions regarding health policy
b. Adequately evaluate clinical developments

Key epidemiological concepts
1. Prevalence
a. Number of people with cancer/ population at risk (at a certain moment in time)
b. Example: 5 year cancer prevalence at 1 january 2019 in NL: you look at all living
cancer patients who have been diagnosed in the previous 5 years in the NL
2. Incidence
a. Number of newly diagnosed cases of cancer/population at risk (at a certain time
period)
b. Example: incidence in 2018 in NL: you look at number of newly diagnosed cancer
cases in 2018 in NL
3. Mortality
a. T a certain time period
b. Can be described as
i. CR: crude rate  number of new cases per 100 000 persons per year

, ii. ESR: European standardized rate  number of new cases per 100 000 per
year, standardized for the age composition of Europe
iii. WSR: world standardized rate --? Number of new cases per 100 000 persons
per year, standardized for age composition of the world
4. Relative survival
a. The percentage of cancer cases alive at a certain time period after diagnosis )not
including those who died from other diseases (e.g. 5 year relative survival:
percentage of cancer cases who survived 5 years)

Why more stomach cancer in Asia
1. Helicobacter pylori
2. Food conservation (salt, smoke)

Why more liver cancer in Africa/Asia
1. Hepatitis B
2. Aflatoxin (present in peanuts and soy: fungi who grows in it)

Why more cervix cancer in south America/Africa
1. Human papillomavirus

Most frequent invasive tumours in Netherlands
Males:
1. Prostate
2. Skin excl bcc
3. Colorectal
4. Lung
Female
1. Breast
2. Skin excl bcc
3. Colorectal
4. Lung ‘

Cancer deaths in Netherlands: lung cancer  due to smoking!

Etiology
(risk factors)
 Most important risk factor: Age!
Why? Because time is needed for accumulation of damage to daughter cells/ mutations in regulatory
genes
- spontaneous
- Chemical substances
- Radiation
- Viruses
+ repair tools less effective
+ less control by micro-environment

Protective tools against damage accumulation
- Repair of blueprint (DNA repair)

, - Clean suicide (apoptosis)
- Mitosis stops (senescence)

Grey pressure (number 65+ / number 20 – 64): more and more older people  influencing cancer
incidence: increase
(also increases survival rates, but still increase in cancer deaths each year)
So, there is an increase of people living with cancer  which is an enormous public health problem
- Double ageing phenomenon
- Better survival because of
o Early detection
o Improved treatment
- More expensive health care
o Diagnosis
o treatment
 Important: focus on prevention

In order to be able to focus on prevention: you need to know the causes of cancer
How do you identify causes of cancer?
1. Accidental finding/ keep alert
a. Nuns: breast cancer related to hormone exposure
b. Doctor: skin cancer after radiation on hands (x-ray)
c. Watch-making (martland): painting watches with radium (wetting point of pensil
with mount) led to bone cancer
d. Recent examples:
i. Chrome-6 in paint in army
ii. GenX in drinking water
iii. TATA steel, 50% more lung cancer in people living in area around TATA steal
2. Systematic counting / trends
a. Eye cancer: one vs two hits needed
i. Two hits: unilateral (both heritable and spontaneous)
ii. One hit: bilateral (one genetic hit)
b. Stomach cancer
i. Differences in different parts of world in risk of stomach cancer
ii.  migrant studies: they identified life style factors were important
c. Melanoma
i. Increase in melanoma incidence over time: why? Due to sun bathing
3. Focussed research: human observational or model experimental
a. Case control study: identifying cases + finding
suitable controls
i. Questionary: asking about past behaviour
ii. Problem: people can remember their past
behaviour different
b. Prospective cohort study: starting with healthy
people
i. Again questioning: but then look over time
at exposed compared to non-exposed (and
then at diseased not diseased)

, ii. Advantage: no bias between case and disease (because when the
questionary is started, there is no disease yet)
iii. Disadvantage: large sample size, as you have to wait till cancer develops
4. Exploration

Smoking and cancer
Related to cancer of
1. Lung (95%)
2. Bladder (50%)
3. Stomach
4. Intestine
5. Oesophagus
6. Mouth
7. Pancreas
But also, cardiovascular diseases and impotence

Tobacco carcinogens, biomarkers and tabacco induced cancer
Nicotine: addictive agent of cigarettes
Carcinogens, can be
- Excreted
- Metabolic activation which will lead to mutations and other changes
- Receptor binding leading to AKT and PKA activation
Or, co-carcinogens and tumour promotors: leads to PKC and AP1 activation and enhanced
carcinogenicity

Prevelance by healthy diet, body weight, and physical activity
 33% of cancers, but depending on cancer type and country

Third expert report: WCRF report  a systematic literature review containing
1. Descriptive studies
2. Ecological studies
3. Migrant studies
4. Experimental studies
5. Case-control studies
6. Cohort studies
7. Randomized controlled trials
 They gave a summary of strong evidence on diet, nutrition, physical activity and the
prevention of cancer

Grading the evidence
- Convincing
o Strong and unlikely to change in future
o No explained heterogeneity
o At least 2 independent cohort studies
o Good quality studies that account for error
o Dose response
o Robust evidence from laboratory studies
- Probable
€3,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
juliateders Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
13
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
10
Documenten
6
Laatst verkocht
9 maanden geleden

0,0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen