100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Antwoorden

Unit 19 M2 - compare the effectiveness of different teams

Beoordeling
3,1
(12)
Verkocht
42
Pagina's
5
Geüpload op
18-01-2016
Geschreven in
2014/2015

For M2, one of the teams that learners compare, should be their own team(s). The other team could be another within the class or from a different class, or it could be another team, for example one that the learner can study through their work experience or are involved in outside the classroom. In their comparison, they should refer to one, or more than one, of their own team leaders, which could be the learner themselves or someone else. They could assess the other team either as an outsider or from working within it (either currently or in the past). The emphasis here should be on analysis ie of the key elements of effective team operation. This could include constructive collaboration over resource creation, shared strategies for dealing with particular issues, willingness to solve problems together, sharing of expertise, recognition of distinctive talents and a measure of humour.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak








Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
18 januari 2016
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2014/2015
Type
Antwoorden
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Unit 19 - M2

FOR NOTES AND GUIDLINE PURPOSES ONLY, COPYING THE
WHOLE DOCUMENT WILL BE COPYWRITE.

USE SENSIBLE.



In this assignment I’m going to compare the effectiveness of
different teams in my class. In this part of unit 19 I’m going to
compare my team against another team in my class. I will talk
about how things were in other teams and my team. I will also
talk how my team was successful in our group activity. This will
all be done by some merging what happened from P6.
Effectiveness of the teams:
The members of my team all decided it’ll be fair to do a modest
discussion of who should be the team leader as doing a random
vote wouldn’t be effective for the group. Because that person
might not want to do it and they might be sluggish towards the
task’s being given. As we progressed with that decision we had
a good brief on the task and there was no conflict. Due to that
judgment I labelled my teams overall effectiveness a 4/5 on my
P6. Team effectiveness is the capability a team has to achieve
the goals or objectives managed by authorized personnel. To
make a team have good effectiveness the mains thing is to
have individual contributors their efforts and work toward a
common goal. Good teams don’t happen by accident; hard
work, commitment and some amount of struggle are usually
involved in creating successful teams. Team B which is my
team the effectiveness which we had was okay it wasn’t perfect
due to the fact that not every individual contributed the way we
would of like but our effectiveness was good. Also teams A
effectiveness was good simply because there team member
contributed towards all task and was committed to what was
happening.
Team building:
Compared to the other team we all welcoming towards each
over. This allowed for a very united group, which obviously led
to great ideas being thrown around. In P6 I outlined the team
building to be 5/5 because despite some lack of professionalism
€4,15
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:
Gekocht door 42 studenten

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Beoordelingen van geverifieerde kopers

7 van 12 beoordelingen worden weergegeven
5 jaar geleden

7 jaar geleden

7 jaar geleden

7 jaar geleden

8 jaar geleden

8 jaar geleden

8 jaar geleden

3,1

12 beoordelingen

5
3
4
3
3
2
2
0
1
4
Betrouwbare reviews op Stuvia

Alle beoordelingen zijn geschreven door echte Stuvia-gebruikers na geverifieerde aankopen.

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
thebestanswers PEARSON
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
1574
Lid sinds
10 jaar
Aantal volgers
782
Documenten
182
Laatst verkocht
1 jaar geleden

Hey guys, all of you studying BTEC out there know how frustrating it can get with all those assignments. While studying myself I always wished there was someone to help me with my assignments and even having a template can make it twice as easy at times, so, here you go. I have every major unit. Use sensible guys.

3,7

653 beoordelingen

5
242
4
158
3
127
2
48
1
78

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen