Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

MNB3701 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025

Vendu
5
Pages
11
Qualité
A+
Publié le
07-09-2025
Écrit en
2025/2026

MNB3701 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us..

Établissement
Cours









Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

Livre connecté

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
7 septembre 2025
Nombre de pages
11
Écrit en
2025/2026
Type
Examen
Contenu
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

MNB3701
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
Unique Number: 884546

Due Date: September 2025
INTRODUCTION

International business plays a crucial role in shaping the strategies of multinational
enterprises (MNEs) as they engage with foreign markets under diverse institutional and
cultural conditions. The study of global business requires an understanding of both formal
institutions such as political, legal, and economic frameworks, and informal institutions such
as culture, values, and social norms (Meyer & Peng, 2019:32). These institutional factors
strongly influence trade, investment, and production decisions. The two cases presented in
this assignment, namely China’s growing investment footprint in Africa and Apple’s reliance
on manufacturing partnerships in China, highlight how multinational firms balance
opportunities and risks in global operations. The China–Africa case demonstrates how
comparative advantage, resource access, and the eclectic paradigm shape foreign direct
investment strategies in developing economies, while the Apple case illustrates the
challenges of outsourcing, supply chain efficiency, and responsible business conduct. By
applying theoretical frameworks from international business, this assignment critically
evaluates how firms pursue global competitiveness, manage risks, and respond to ethical
Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 67 171 1739



INTRODUCTION

International business plays a crucial role in shaping the strategies of multinational
enterprises (MNEs) as they engage with foreign markets under diverse institutional
and cultural conditions. The study of global business requires an understanding of
both formal institutions such as political, legal, and economic frameworks, and
informal institutions such as culture, values, and social norms (Meyer & Peng,
2019:32). These institutional factors strongly influence trade, investment, and
production decisions. The two cases presented in this assignment, namely China’s
growing investment footprint in Africa and Apple’s reliance on manufacturing
partnerships in China, highlight how multinational firms balance opportunities and
risks in global operations. The China–Africa case demonstrates how comparative
advantage, resource access, and the eclectic paradigm shape foreign direct
investment strategies in developing economies, while the Apple case illustrates the
challenges of outsourcing, supply chain efficiency, and responsible business
conduct. By applying theoretical frameworks from international business, this
assignment critically evaluates how firms pursue global competitiveness, manage
risks, and respond to ethical considerations in complex international environments.




QUESTION 1

1.1

Using the institution-based view, explain how formal and informal institutions
influence foreign investment decisions in African markets. Give two examples
for each institution.

The institution-based view emphasises that business decisions are shaped by the
―rules of the game‖ in a given environment. These rules are divided into formal
institutions, laws, regulations, and rules created by governments or authorised
bodies and informal institutions, norms, values, cultures, and ethics that are
embedded within societies. Both play a critical role in shaping foreign direct
investment (FDI) decisions in African markets because they reduce uncertainty and
signal what is legitimate or acceptable behaviour for firms (Peng & Meyer, 2019:34)

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
2,65 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Avis des acheteurs vérifiés

Affichage de tous les 2 avis
3 mois de cela

3 mois de cela

4,5

2 revues

5
1
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Avis fiables sur Stuvia

Tous les avis sont réalisés par de vrais utilisateurs de Stuvia après des achats vérifiés.

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
149203
Membre depuis
7 année
Nombre de followers
35996
Documents
4352
Dernière vente
10 heures de cela

4,2

13562 revues

5
7808
4
2689
3
1791
2
455
1
819

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions