Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

RSK2602 Assignment 1 Semester 2 Memo | Due 20 August 2025

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
9
Qualité
A+
Publié le
12-08-2025
Écrit en
2025/2026

RSK2602 Assignment 1 Semester 2 Memo | Due 20 August 2025. All questions fully answered. Question 1 1.1 Operational failures caused by staff are driven by error, fraud and data theft. True/False 1.2 Technology and systems are examples of external drivers of operational risk management. True/False 1.3 Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from human error, management failure and fraud or shortcomings in systems or controls. This would include strategic and reputational risk. True/False 1.4 Risk-indifferent requires no changes in the risk/reward balance in return for an increase in risk. This attitude is usually not conducive for taking any risks to enhance the business. True/False 1.5 Self-insurance can be achieved by way of captives. True/False

Montrer plus Lire moins
Établissement
Cours









Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

Livre connecté

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
12 août 2025
Nombre de pages
9
Écrit en
2025/2026
Type
Examen
Contenu
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE TO ANSWER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

 Question 1

1. Evaluate the accuracy of each of the following statements. Indicate whether you consider the
statement accurate (true) or not (false) and provide a full motivation for your answer.

1.1. Operational failures caused by staff are driven by error, fraud and data theft.

True
Operational failures from staff typically stem from human error (unintentional mistakes), fraud
(intentional deception for personal gain), and data theft (unauthorized access or theft of information).
These are well-recognized drivers in operational risk management.

1.2. Technology and systems are examples of external drivers of operational risk management.

False
The statement inaccurately classifies technology and systems as external drivers of operational risk
management. Technology and systems are considered internal or underlying risk factors, not external
ones. While external risks include disasters or fraud, technology-related risks, such as system failures
or hacking, are categorized as internal operational issues. Therefore, technology and systems should
not be labeled as external drivers of operational risk.

1.3. Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from human error, management failure and fraud
or shortcomings in systems or controls. This would include strategic and reputational risk.

False
The statement incorrectly includes strategic and reputational risk as part of operational risk. While
operational risk involves factors like human error, fraud, and system failures, it does not encompass
strategic or reputational risks. These two types of risk are classified separately from operational risk
and are considered distinct categories of non-financial risks.

1.4. Risk-indifferent requires no changes in the risk/reward balance in return for an increase in
risk. This attitude is usually not conducive for taking any risks to enhance the business.

False
The statement inaccurately describes the concept of "risk-indifferent." Being risk-indifferent means
there is no adjustment to the risk/reward balance despite an increase in risk, but this does not
necessarily mean it prevents taking risks to enhance the business. In fact, organizations may still take
risks within their established risk tolerance, even if the reward does not directly correlate with the
risk. The statement oversimplifies the relationship between risk attitudes and business strategy,
making it inaccurate.
2,65 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
Aimark94 University of South Africa (Unisa)
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
6579
Membre depuis
6 année
Nombre de followers
3168
Documents
1329
Dernière vente
3 jours de cela
Simple & Affordable Study Materials

Study Packs & Assignments

4,2

522 revues

5
277
4
125
3
74
2
14
1
32

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions