Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

ACRP-CP EXAM 2025 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
112
Qualité
A+
Publié le
11-08-2025
Écrit en
2025/2026

Belmont Report (1979) - ANS ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. respect for persons - ANS individuals should be treated as autonomous agents and persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection An autonomous person - ANS A person capable of deliberation about personal goals and of acting under the direction of such deliberation Beneficence - ANS Do not harm and maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms Justice - ANS 1) to each person an equal share 2) to each person according to individual need 3) to each person according to individual effort 4) to each person according to societal contributions 5) to each person according to merit Justice - ANS · The selection of research subjects needs to be scrutinized in order to determine whether some classes are being systematically selected simply because of their easy availability, their compromised position, or their manipulability, rather than for reasons directly related to the problem being studied. Justice - ANS · Whenever research supported by public funds leads to the development of therapeutic devices and procedures, justice demands both that these not provide advantages only to those who can afford them and that such research should not unduly involve persons from groups unlikely to be among the beneficiaries of subsequent applications of the research. ACRP-CP EXAM 2025 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS @COPYRIGHT FYNDLAY 2025/2026 Page2 Three elements of the consent process - ANS information, comprehension, voluntariness What is an example of how the principle of beneficence can be applied to a study employing human subjects - ANS Determining the study has a maximization of benefits and a minimization of risks What are the three principles discussed in the Belmont Report? - ANS Respect for persons, beneficence, justice The Belmont Report's principle of respect for persons incorporates at least 2 ethical convictions: first, that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and second, that: - ANS Persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection Nuremberg Code (1947) - ANS 1) a requirements for voluntary consent 2) the research must have scientific merit 3) The benefits of the research must outweigh the risks 4) Subjects have the ability to terminate participation in the research at any time National Research Act (1974) - ANS 1) Authorized the creation of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, which was charged with developing an ethical code and guidelines for researchers 2) Required the establishment of IRBs at organizations receiving PHS support for human subject's research The National Commission ( - ANS Issued a series of reports on vulnerable populations (such as fetuses, children, prisoners, and the "mentally infirm") psychosurgery, IRBs, and other topics that included recommendations for regulating human subjects' research. These recommendations had significant influence on the development of the federal regulations governing human subject research. 45 CFR 46 - ANS Also known as the Common Rule, this legislation established the role of institutional review boards (IRBs) for research on human rights. @COPYRIGHT FYNDLAY 2025/2026 Page3 Additional protection for these individuals in research - ANS 1) pregnant women, human fetuses, and neonates 2) children 3) prisoners 21 CFR 50 - ANS Informed Consent 21 CFR 56 - ANS IRB 21 CFR 812 - ANS Investigational Medical Devices 21 CFR 312 - ANS Investigational Drugs and Biologics Declaration of Helsinki (1964) - ANS Recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects WHO Guidelines (1996) Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health- related Research with Human Participants" - ANS Documents designed to serve as international guidelines for the review and conduct of research involving human subjects ICH E6 - ANS Guideline for Good Clinical Practice The use of prisoners in research is a concern under the Belmont principle for Justice because: - ANS Prisoners may not be used to conduct research that only benefits the larger society What was the result of the Beecher article? - ANS Realization that ethical abuses are not limited to the Nazi regime Issued in 1974, 45 CFR 46 raised to regulatory status: - ANS US Public Health Service Policy @COPYRIGHT FYNDLAY 2025/2026 Page4 What is included in the Nuremberg Code? - ANS Informed consent Informed consent is considered an application of which Belmont principle? - ANS Respect for persons IRB (Institutional Review Board) - ANS A review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects Regulations require: - ANS IRB review and approval for research involving human subjects if it is conducted, supported, or regulated by US federal departments and agencies Federal regulations stipulate that an IRB can: - ANS Approve research, require modifications, disapprove research, conduct continuing reviews, verify no material changes occurred since previous review, observe, suspend/terminate approval Conveyed committee review - ANS Full committee review. Standard type of review described in the federal regulations. Must be used for the initial review of all studies that are not eligible for expedited review or exemption Expedited review - ANS Can be used for established categories and minor changes in previously approved research, and for limited IRB review of select exemption categories Categories for expedited review: - ANS 1) The research does not involve more than minimal risk 2) The entire research project must be consistent with one or more of the federally defined categories (IND/IDE note required) Types of IRB submissions - ANS 1) Applic

Montrer plus Lire moins
Établissement
ACRP-CP
Cours
ACRP-CP











Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
ACRP-CP
Cours
ACRP-CP

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
11 août 2025
Nombre de pages
112
Écrit en
2025/2026
Type
Examen
Contenu
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

ACRP-CP EXAM 2025 QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS


Belmont Report (1979) - ANS ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human
subjects of research.



respect for persons - ANS individuals should be treated as autonomous agents and persons
with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection



An autonomous person - ANS A person capable of deliberation about personal goals and of
acting under the direction of such deliberation



Beneficence - ANS Do not harm and maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms



Justice - ANS 1) to each person an equal share 2) to each person according to individual need
3) to each person according to individual effort 4) to each person according to societal
contributions 5) to each person according to merit



Justice - ANS · The selection of research subjects needs to be scrutinized in order to
determine whether some classes are being systematically selected simply because of their easy
availability, their compromised position, or their manipulability, rather than for reasons directly
related to the problem being studied.



Justice - ANS · Whenever research supported by public funds leads to the development of
therapeutic devices and procedures, justice demands both that these not provide advantages
only to those who can afford them and that such research should not unduly involve persons
1




from groups unlikely to be among the beneficiaries of subsequent applications of the research.
Page




@COPYRIGHT FYNDLAY 2025/2026

, Three elements of the consent process - ANS information, comprehension, voluntariness


What is an example of how the principle of beneficence can be applied to a study employing
human subjects - ANS Determining the study has a maximization of benefits and a
minimization of risks



What are the three principles discussed in the Belmont Report? - ANS Respect for persons,
beneficence, justice


The Belmont Report's principle of respect for persons incorporates at least 2 ethical
convictions: first, that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents, and second, that: -
ANS Persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection



Nuremberg Code (1947) - ANS 1) a requirements for voluntary consent 2) the research must
have scientific merit 3) The benefits of the research must outweigh the risks 4) Subjects have
the ability to terminate participation in the research at any time



National Research Act (1974) - ANS 1) Authorized the creation of the National Commission
for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, which was
charged with developing an ethical code and guidelines for researchers 2) Required the
establishment of IRBs at organizations receiving PHS support for human subject's research



The National Commission (1975-1978 - ANS Issued a series of reports on vulnerable
populations (such as fetuses, children, prisoners, and the "mentally infirm") psychosurgery,
IRBs, and other topics that included recommendations for regulating human subjects' research.
These recommendations had significant influence on the development of the federal
regulations governing human subject research.



45 CFR 46 - ANS Also known as the Common Rule, this legislation established the role of
2




institutional review boards (IRBs) for research on human rights.
Page




@COPYRIGHT FYNDLAY 2025/2026

, Additional protection for these individuals in research - ANS 1) pregnant women, human
fetuses, and neonates 2) children 3) prisoners



21 CFR 50 - ANS Informed Consent



21 CFR 56 - ANS IRB



21 CFR 812 - ANS Investigational Medical Devices



21 CFR 312 - ANS Investigational Drugs and Biologics



Declaration of Helsinki (1964) - ANS Recommendations guiding medical doctors in
biomedical research involving human subjects


WHO Guidelines (1996) Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-
related Research with Human Participants" - ANS Documents designed to serve as
international guidelines for the review and conduct of research involving human subjects



ICH E6 - ANS Guideline for Good Clinical Practice


The use of prisoners in research is a concern under the Belmont principle for Justice because: -
ANS Prisoners may not be used to conduct research that only benefits the larger society



What was the result of the Beecher article? - ANS Realization that ethical abuses are not
limited to the Nazi regime
3




Issued in 1974, 45 CFR 46 raised to regulatory status: - ANS US Public Health Service Policy
Page




@COPYRIGHT FYNDLAY 2025/2026

, What is included in the Nuremberg Code? - ANS Informed consent



Informed consent is considered an application of which Belmont principle? - ANS Respect for
persons



IRB (Institutional Review Board) - ANS A review committee established to help protect the
rights and welfare of human research subjects



Regulations require: - ANS IRB review and approval for research involving human subjects if
it is conducted, supported, or regulated by US federal departments and agencies



Federal regulations stipulate that an IRB can: - ANS Approve research, require modifications,
disapprove research, conduct continuing reviews, verify no material changes occurred since
previous review, observe, suspend/terminate approval



Conveyed committee review - ANS Full committee review. Standard type of review described
in the federal regulations. Must be used for the initial review of all studies that are not eligible
for expedited review or exemption



Expedited review - ANS Can be used for established categories and minor changes in
previously approved research, and for limited IRB review of select exemption categories



Categories for expedited review: - ANS 1) The research does not involve more than minimal
risk
2) The entire research project must be consistent with one or more of the federally defined
categories (IND/IDE note required)



Types of IRB submissions - ANS 1) Application for initial review
4
Page




@COPYRIGHT FYNDLAY 2025/2026
13,26 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien


Document également disponible en groupe

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
Fyndlay Kaplan University
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
357
Membre depuis
1 année
Nombre de followers
80
Documents
18668
Dernière vente
3 jours de cela
Scholar\'s Sanctuary.

Explore a Vast Collection of Finely Made Learning Materials.

3,7

68 revues

5
32
4
8
3
13
2
6
1
9

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions