FUR2601
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
2 2025
Unique Number:
Due date: August 2025
QUESTION 1
SCENARIO 1
Applicable law:
This scenario involves sex-based discrimination through derogatory and gender-stereotyped
language in a work or contractual context. It may fall under:
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, specifically section 9 (equality
clause prohibiting unfair discrimination on grounds of gender).1
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000
(PEPUDA), which prohibits unfair gender discrimination in public life.1
The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA) if the setting is workplace-related.1
Standing
The aggrieved woman has locus standi as a direct victim of discrimination in terms of section
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1
SCENARIO 1
Applicable law:
This scenario involves sex-based discrimination through derogatory and gender-
stereotyped language in a work or contractual context. It may fall under:
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, specifically section 9
(equality clause prohibiting unfair discrimination on grounds of gender).1
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of
2000 (PEPUDA), which prohibits unfair gender discrimination in public life.2
The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA) if the setting is workplace-
related.3
Standing
The aggrieved woman has locus standi as a direct victim of discrimination in terms of
section 38 of the Constitution4 and the relevant statutory provisions in PEPUDA and
the EEA.
Jurisdiction
The Equality Court (for PEPUDA claims)5.
The Labour Court (if the incident arose in an employment relationship).6
The High Court (for constitutional enforcement of the right to equality).7
Remedies:
1
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 9.
2
Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA) s 6.
3
Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 s 6.
4
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 38.
5
PEPUDA, ch 4.
6
Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, s 157.
7
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 169.
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
2 2025
Unique Number:
Due date: August 2025
QUESTION 1
SCENARIO 1
Applicable law:
This scenario involves sex-based discrimination through derogatory and gender-stereotyped
language in a work or contractual context. It may fall under:
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, specifically section 9 (equality
clause prohibiting unfair discrimination on grounds of gender).1
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000
(PEPUDA), which prohibits unfair gender discrimination in public life.1
The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA) if the setting is workplace-related.1
Standing
The aggrieved woman has locus standi as a direct victim of discrimination in terms of section
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1
SCENARIO 1
Applicable law:
This scenario involves sex-based discrimination through derogatory and gender-
stereotyped language in a work or contractual context. It may fall under:
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, specifically section 9
(equality clause prohibiting unfair discrimination on grounds of gender).1
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of
2000 (PEPUDA), which prohibits unfair gender discrimination in public life.2
The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA) if the setting is workplace-
related.3
Standing
The aggrieved woman has locus standi as a direct victim of discrimination in terms of
section 38 of the Constitution4 and the relevant statutory provisions in PEPUDA and
the EEA.
Jurisdiction
The Equality Court (for PEPUDA claims)5.
The Labour Court (if the incident arose in an employment relationship).6
The High Court (for constitutional enforcement of the right to equality).7
Remedies:
1
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 9.
2
Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA) s 6.
3
Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 s 6.
4
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 38.
5
PEPUDA, ch 4.
6
Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, s 157.
7
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, s 169.
