Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025

Vendu
18
Pages
11
Qualité
A+
Publié le
11-08-2025
Écrit en
2025/2026

FUR2601 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE September 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.6.7-1.7.1-1.7.3.9. Ensure your success with us. In respect of each of the four different scenarios below, you are required to consider whether they constitute fair discrimination; unfair discrimination; or another appropriate word/phrase or concept. Justify and explain your answer by addressing each of the four points below relating to each individual scenario: 1. Which of the following laws (if at all or more than one) is applicable in each scenario? (i) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 200 of 1993; (ii) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996; (iii) The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998; (iv) The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000; 2. Does the aggrieved person(s) have standing (locus standi)? 3. Which court(s) has jurisdiction to adjudicate/decide the matter? 4. What remedies would be appropriate? Scenario 1: As a woman, there are a few words and phrases I hear about myself: “Aggressive”, for going after a promotion. “Controlling,” when I made household decisions. “Crazy,” by someone who didn’t like my attitude. “Difficult,” when I asked for more money when I had been contracted to perform a certain assignment. “Bitchy,” when I turned down another person’s idea. “Emotional” for raising my voice. “Hysterical” for getting angry, and a “stalker” for being persistent.1 Scenario 2: Caster Semenya is a person born with differences of sexual development (DSD). She is prohibited from competing in international sports activities with other women unless she takes medication to reduce her testosterone levels. Scenario 3: In recounting the Treason Trial during March 1960, Nelson Mandela referred to an incident where Justice Kennedy, a white man fluent in isiZulu responded with the words ‘Sinjalo thina maZulu’ (We Zulus are like that) in reference to one of Dr Wilson Conco’s medical achievements.2 Scenario 4: Michael was born male but has always identified as female. They began the process of gender reassignment about a year ago but has not told anyone about this. Recently she came to work dressed in a skirt, high heels, wearing make-up and a wig and informed everyone that they should be addressed as Michelle. Michelle was told to go home and change as she was embarrassing other staff members and clients. QUESTION 2 (8 marks) Discuss whether the statement below is true by relying on relevant authority, such as provisions of the law; reference to the prescribed study material;3 and case law. “Anyone seeking primary health care at any governmental medical facility in South Africa is required to produce their South African Identity Document. If the person does not possess a South Africa Identity Document, they are turned away from the facility, regardless of the circumstances”.

Montrer plus Lire moins
Établissement
Cours








Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

Livre connecté

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
11 août 2025
Nombre de pages
11
Écrit en
2025/2026
Type
Examen
Contenu
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

FUR2601
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2025
Unique Number:

Due Date: September 2025
QUESTION 1

SCENARIO 1

Applicable law:

This scenario involves sex-based discrimination through derogatory and gender-stereotyped
language in a work or contractual context. It may fall under:

 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, specifically section 9 (equality
clause prohibiting unfair discrimination on grounds of gender).1

 The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000
(PEPUDA), which prohibits unfair gender discrimination in public life.1

 The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA) if the setting is workplace-related.1



Standing

The aggrieved woman has locus standi as a direct victim of discrimination in terms ofTerms of use
section
By making use of this document you agree to:
38 of the Constitution1 and the relevant statutory provisions in PEPUDA and the EEA.
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.
2,65 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:
Acheté par 18 étudiants

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Avis des acheteurs vérifiés

Affichage de tous les 4 avis
3 mois de cela

3 mois de cela

3 mois de cela

4 mois de cela

4,8

4 revues

5
3
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0
Avis fiables sur Stuvia

Tous les avis sont réalisés par de vrais utilisateurs de Stuvia après des achats vérifiés.

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
EduPal University of South Africa (Unisa)
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
149205
Membre depuis
7 année
Nombre de followers
35996
Documents
4352
Dernière vente
19 heures de cela

4,2

13562 revues

5
7808
4
2689
3
1791
2
455
1
819

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions