MRL3702 Assignment
1 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2
2025 - DUE August
2025
NO PLAGIARISM
[Pick the date]
[Type the company name]
, Exam (elaborations)
MRL3702 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE August
2025
Course
Labour Law (MRL3702)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
The Essential Labour Law Handbook
MRL3702 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE
August 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Study the case of Moleme v Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd (D581/2023) [2025]
ZALCD 18 (7 May 2025) and write a two-page (maximum) legal opinion
about the case. Your answer must include the following aspects: Summary
of the facts of the case Issue(s) in dispute in the case The court’s decision
At the end provide a well-supported legal opinion which should cover the
Legal Opinion: Moleme v Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd
(D581/2023) [2025] ZALCD 18 (7 May 2025)
To: Interested Parties From: [Your Name/Firm] Date: July 30, 2025 Subject: Legal Opinion on
Pregnancy Discrimination in Moleme v Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd
1. Summary of the Facts of the Case
Ms. Tiisetso Moleme ("the Applicant") was employed by Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd ("the
Respondent") as a Research and Development (R&D) Chemist, a role that involved routine
exposure to various chemical substances in a laboratory environment. In March 2023,
approximately twelve weeks into her pregnancy, Ms. Moleme informed her employer of her
condition and expressed concerns about continuing to work in the laboratory due to potential
chemical exposure, specifically mentioning Bisphenol A. She formally requested a reassignment
or workplace accommodation to ensure her safety and that of her unborn child.
In response to her notification, the Respondent’s Technical and Commercial Manager, Mr.
Powell, instructed Ms. Moleme to move to an adjacent office. Crucially, she was not provided
with any substantial or meaningful work functions during her time in this office, despite an initial
agreement for her to carry out limited functions with a computer. The Respondent engaged in
1 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2
2025 - DUE August
2025
NO PLAGIARISM
[Pick the date]
[Type the company name]
, Exam (elaborations)
MRL3702 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE
ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE August
2025
Course
Labour Law (MRL3702)
Institution
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
The Essential Labour Law Handbook
MRL3702 Assignment 1 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2025 - DUE
August 2025; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations.
Study the case of Moleme v Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd (D581/2023) [2025]
ZALCD 18 (7 May 2025) and write a two-page (maximum) legal opinion
about the case. Your answer must include the following aspects: Summary
of the facts of the case Issue(s) in dispute in the case The court’s decision
At the end provide a well-supported legal opinion which should cover the
Legal Opinion: Moleme v Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd
(D581/2023) [2025] ZALCD 18 (7 May 2025)
To: Interested Parties From: [Your Name/Firm] Date: July 30, 2025 Subject: Legal Opinion on
Pregnancy Discrimination in Moleme v Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd
1. Summary of the Facts of the Case
Ms. Tiisetso Moleme ("the Applicant") was employed by Induradec Coatings (Pty) Ltd ("the
Respondent") as a Research and Development (R&D) Chemist, a role that involved routine
exposure to various chemical substances in a laboratory environment. In March 2023,
approximately twelve weeks into her pregnancy, Ms. Moleme informed her employer of her
condition and expressed concerns about continuing to work in the laboratory due to potential
chemical exposure, specifically mentioning Bisphenol A. She formally requested a reassignment
or workplace accommodation to ensure her safety and that of her unborn child.
In response to her notification, the Respondent’s Technical and Commercial Manager, Mr.
Powell, instructed Ms. Moleme to move to an adjacent office. Crucially, she was not provided
with any substantial or meaningful work functions during her time in this office, despite an initial
agreement for her to carry out limited functions with a computer. The Respondent engaged in
