HMDVA81 Assignment 4 2025
2 2025
Unique Number:
Due date: 6 August 2025
QUESTION 1: STUDY TYPE ANALYSIS
This study is typical of a mixed-method research design because it combines both
qualitative and quantitative methods. The use of focus group discussions (FGDs) is a clear
sign of a qualitative approach. FGDs allow for the collection of in-depth information through
open discussions, where participants share their personal experiences, views, and
emotions. This method helps the researchers understand the deeper meaning behind
behaviours, attitudes, and social norms, which are crucial when exploring topics like
empowerment, identity, and roles within communities.
On the other hand, the study also used a quantitative household survey, which is a
hallmark of quantitative research. This method involves structured data collection using
closed-ended questions, enabling researchers to gather measurable data from a larger
population. Quantitative surveys allow for statistical analysis, generalisation of findings, and
testing of specific hypotheses, such as determining the extent to which women have been
economically empowered by the goat farming programme.
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1: STUDY TYPE ANALYSIS
This study is typical of a mixed-method research design because it combines both
qualitative and quantitative methods. The use of focus group discussions (FGDs) is a
clear sign of a qualitative approach. FGDs allow for the collection of in-depth
information through open discussions, where participants share their personal
experiences, views, and emotions. This method helps the researchers understand
the deeper meaning behind behaviours, attitudes, and social norms, which are
crucial when exploring topics like empowerment, identity, and roles within
communities.
On the other hand, the study also used a quantitative household survey, which is
a hallmark of quantitative research. This method involves structured data collection
using closed-ended questions, enabling researchers to gather measurable data from
a larger population. Quantitative surveys allow for statistical analysis, generalisation
of findings, and testing of specific hypotheses, such as determining the extent to
which women have been economically empowered by the goat farming programme.
The integration of both methods shows that the study aimed to benefit from the
strengths of each approach. The qualitative data from FGDs helps to explain the how
and why of women’s empowerment, while the quantitative survey helps to measure
how much empowerment occurred and identify general patterns across the
community. Therefore, this combination enhances the validity, richness, and depth of
the research findings, making it a strong example of a mixed-method study. This
approach is particularly useful in development studies, where both individual
experiences and broader patterns are important.
QUESTION 2: WHICH SAMPLING METHODS WERE MOST APPROPRIATE FOR
THIS STUDY?
In a study that combines focus group discussions (FGDs) and a quantitative
household survey to explore how a goat farming commercialisation programme
empowers women, a combination of non-probability sampling for the qualitative
component and probability sampling for the quantitative component is most
appropriate. Each of these sampling methods serves different goals in mixed-
2 2025
Unique Number:
Due date: 6 August 2025
QUESTION 1: STUDY TYPE ANALYSIS
This study is typical of a mixed-method research design because it combines both
qualitative and quantitative methods. The use of focus group discussions (FGDs) is a clear
sign of a qualitative approach. FGDs allow for the collection of in-depth information through
open discussions, where participants share their personal experiences, views, and
emotions. This method helps the researchers understand the deeper meaning behind
behaviours, attitudes, and social norms, which are crucial when exploring topics like
empowerment, identity, and roles within communities.
On the other hand, the study also used a quantitative household survey, which is a
hallmark of quantitative research. This method involves structured data collection using
closed-ended questions, enabling researchers to gather measurable data from a larger
population. Quantitative surveys allow for statistical analysis, generalisation of findings, and
testing of specific hypotheses, such as determining the extent to which women have been
economically empowered by the goat farming programme.
DISCLAIMER & TERMS OF USE
Educational Aid: These study notes are intended to be used as educational resources and should not be seen as a
replacement for individual research, critical analysis, or professional consultation. Students are encouraged to perform
their own research and seek advice from their instructors or academic advisors for specific assignment guidelines.
Personal Responsibility: While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information in
these study notes, the seller does not guarantee the completeness or correctness of all content. The buyer is
responsible for verifying the accuracy of the information and exercising their own judgment when applying it to their
assignments.
Academic Integrity: It is essential for students to maintain academic integrity and follow their institution's policies
regarding plagiarism, citation, and referencing. These study notes should be used as learning tools and sources of
inspiration. Any direct reproduction of the content without proper citation and acknowledgment may be considered
academic misconduct.
Limited Liability: The seller shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages, losses, or consequences arising from
the use of these notes. This includes, but is not limited to, poor academic performance, penalties, or any other negative
consequences resulting from the application or misuse of the information provided.
, For additional support +27 81 278 3372
QUESTION 1: STUDY TYPE ANALYSIS
This study is typical of a mixed-method research design because it combines both
qualitative and quantitative methods. The use of focus group discussions (FGDs) is a
clear sign of a qualitative approach. FGDs allow for the collection of in-depth
information through open discussions, where participants share their personal
experiences, views, and emotions. This method helps the researchers understand
the deeper meaning behind behaviours, attitudes, and social norms, which are
crucial when exploring topics like empowerment, identity, and roles within
communities.
On the other hand, the study also used a quantitative household survey, which is
a hallmark of quantitative research. This method involves structured data collection
using closed-ended questions, enabling researchers to gather measurable data from
a larger population. Quantitative surveys allow for statistical analysis, generalisation
of findings, and testing of specific hypotheses, such as determining the extent to
which women have been economically empowered by the goat farming programme.
The integration of both methods shows that the study aimed to benefit from the
strengths of each approach. The qualitative data from FGDs helps to explain the how
and why of women’s empowerment, while the quantitative survey helps to measure
how much empowerment occurred and identify general patterns across the
community. Therefore, this combination enhances the validity, richness, and depth of
the research findings, making it a strong example of a mixed-method study. This
approach is particularly useful in development studies, where both individual
experiences and broader patterns are important.
QUESTION 2: WHICH SAMPLING METHODS WERE MOST APPROPRIATE FOR
THIS STUDY?
In a study that combines focus group discussions (FGDs) and a quantitative
household survey to explore how a goat farming commercialisation programme
empowers women, a combination of non-probability sampling for the qualitative
component and probability sampling for the quantitative component is most
appropriate. Each of these sampling methods serves different goals in mixed-
