CIC2601 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

CIC2601 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references ,. Question 1 [20 marks] The aim of question 1 is to enable you to demonstrate your ability to plan the integration of digital tools in teaching. Task: Plan a lesson or teaching strategy that integrates digital technology. Describe how you would ensure it is effective for your students. Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Integration of Digital Technology Clearly describes the digital technology planned and its purpose in the lesson. Describes the digital technology planned with minor details missing. Mentions the digital technology but lacks clarity on its purpose. Vague mention of digital technology with little relevance. No mention of digital technology or irrelevant use. Planning for Effectiveness Provides a detailed explanation of how the lesson is planned to ensure effectiveness for students. Explains planning with some details missing. Basic description of planning for effectiveness. Vague description of planning for effectiveness. No description of planning for effectiveness. Enhancement of Student Learning Thoroughly explains how the planned integration will enhance student learning. Explains enhancement with some details missing. Basic explanation of enhancement. Vague explanation of enhancement. No explanation of enhancement. 4 Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. 5 Question 2 [20 marks] The aim of question 2 is to enable you to think about assessment strategies in the digital age and how they can measure student learning effectively. Task: Describe how you would plan to use formative assessment tools (e.g., quizzes, online discussions, peer feedback) in your digital teaching strategy. Provide specific examples. Criteria Excellent (5) Good (4) Satisfactory (3) Needs Improvement (2) Poor (1) Use of Formative Assessment Tools Clearly describes multiple formative assessment tools and their planned use. Describes formative assessment tools with minor details missing. Mentions formative assessment tools but lacks clarity on their use. Vague mention of formative assessment tools. No mention of formative assessment tools. Examples Provided Provides detailed and relevant examples of formative assessment tools. Provides examples with some details missing. Basic examples provided. Vague examples. No examples provided. Measurement of Student Learning Thoroughly explains how the tools will measure Explains measurement with some details missing. Basic explanation of measurement. Vague explanation of measurement. No explanation of measurement. 6 student learning. Academic Integrity The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. No spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of all claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. All sources are scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear, concise, and formal language. Minimal spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of most claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are primarily scholarly and relate to the topic. The submission is presented in clear and concise language. Use of formal language is intermittent. Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes. Evidence of some claims made in the submission is provided in the text and there is a reference list at the end of the submission. Sources are not primarily scholarly and relate to the topic but somewhat tangentially. Language use is poor; lack of use of formal language; excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes. Little, if any, citation of sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. Sources are disproportionately non-scholarly, and most do not relate to the topic. Language use is poor with many mistakes. Sources are not provided both in the text and in the reference list. 7 Question 3 [10 marks] The aim of question 3 is to enable you to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world examples and draw lessons for use in your own teaching practice. Task: Review a case study of a school or classroom that has successfully implemented digital technologies. Identify key strategies used and explain how you could apply these strategies in your future teaching practice.