Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

LCP4807 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED

Note
-
Vendu
2
Pages
13
Qualité
A+
Publié le
28-04-2025
Écrit en
2024/2025

LCP4807 Assignment 2 (DETAILED ANSWERS) Semester 1 2025 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED Answers, guidelines, workings and references , The Republic of Qwanza is a Southern African country with a constitution which is a replica of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) adopted in 2004. Qwanza has ratified the major UN human rights instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR); the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (including the two optional protocols), International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) including its optional Protocols. Qwanza has also ratified the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights; The Protocol Establishing the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. On 15 May 2022 a man was murdered near Bali village in the Republic of Qwanza. Mr Timothy Ibo was accused of committing the crime and brought to trial. He denied the offence. On 15 June 2023 the High Court in Qwanza convicted him of the murder and sentenced him to death, the only sentence available for the offence of murder under Qwanza law. According to Section 46 of the 1960 Criminal and Other Offences Act of Qwanza “a person who commits murder is liable to suffer death.” Mr Ibo claims that the death sentence as provided for in the Criminal and Other Offences Act is unconstitutional and violates several human rights as provided for in the Constitution of Qwanza as well as international human rights instruments that Qwanza has ratified. He then appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal and challenged the conviction and sentence. On 16 March 2024 the Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal both on the conviction and sentence. Mr Ibo further appealed both the conviction and sentence to the Constitutional Court which is the highest court in Qwanza. In November 2024, the Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal against the conviction and rejected the merits of Mr Ibo’s challenge to the Constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty, by holding that the mandatory death sentence for murder was consistent with the laws of Qwanza. The Association for Lawyers Against Death Penalty (ALADP) an International Non-Governmental-Organisation which provides legal representation and assistance to individuals facing death penalty would like to institute legal proceedings against the Republic of Qwanza on behalf of Mr Ibo. ALADP would like to take the matter to the Human Rights Committee of the ICCPR. They approach you as an expert in international human rights law for advice/legal opinion. Using the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other relevant United Nations and African Union instruments advise ALADP. In your legal opinion reflect on whether ALADP can take the case to the Human Rights Committee (HRC). Use authority to justify your answers. Highlight the following points: a) The procedural issues involved in bringing a case before the HRC. b) Merits of the case. c) Alleged rights that the death penalty violates. d) The remedies that the HRC can grant.

Montrer plus Lire moins
Établissement
Cours









Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

Livre connecté

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
28 avril 2025
Nombre de pages
13
Écrit en
2024/2025
Type
Examen
Contenu
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

LCP4807
Assignment 2 Semester 1 2025
Unique #:

Due Date: 29 April 2025

Detailed solutions, explanations, workings
and references.

+27 81 278 3372

, LEGAL OPINION ON BRINGING THE CASE OF MR TIMOTHY IBO BEFORE
THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE (HRC)

This legal opinion provides a critical analysis of the procedural viability of taking
Mr Ibo's case before the HRC, assesses the merits of the case, identifies the
specific rights allegedly violated by the imposition of the death penalty, and
outlines the remedies available through the HRC. In doing so, the opinion draws
upon the ICCPR, its Optional Protocols, and relevant African regional
instruments, offering authoritative references throughout.



1. PROCEDURAL ISSUES INVOLVED IN BRINGING A CASE BEFORE THE
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE

1.1 The Human Rights Committee and Its Jurisdiction

The Human Rights Committee (HRC) was established under Article 28 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to supervise the
implementation of state parties' obligations under the Covenant.1 However, the
Committee’s jurisdiction to receive and consider individual communications is not
inherent; it is contingent upon the state party's ratification of the First Optional
Protocol to the ICCPR.2 A state must be party to both the Covenant and the
Protocol for individuals under its jurisdiction to submit communications.3 As the
Republic of Qwanza has ratified both the ICCPR and the First Optional Protocol,
it has accepted the competence of the HRC to hear individual complaints. Thus,
the Association for Lawyers Against Death Penalty (ALADP), acting on behalf of
Mr Ibo, may theoretically lodge a communication before the Committee.

1.2 Standing to Bring a Communication

Article 1 of the First Optional Protocol stipulates that a communication must be
brought by an individual who claims to be a victim of a violation of the ICCPR
rights.4 However, representatives acting on behalf of victims, such as


1
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Article 28.
2
First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, Preamble.
3
Mmatsie Mooki and Posche Makama, International Human Rights Law: Only Study Guide for LCP4807
(University of South Africa 2019) 24.
4
First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, Article 1.


Varsity Cube 2025 +27 81 278 3372
2,65 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
VarsityC AAA School of Advertising
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
28686
Membre depuis
8 année
Nombre de followers
13258
Documents
3117
Dernière vente
5 jours de cela

4,1

2820 revues

5
1491
4
581
3
392
2
117
1
239

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions