This was scrapped and a new
policy of
told his
generals to prepare for March was driven
overall staling foreign policy during these
years mainly supporting 'popular fronts' abroad
war
an expensive against >
-
1938
,
to protect Soviet borders. Stalius
firmly defensive approach X
by the need
figur against
7 This became official doctrine
Cechslovakia an polene ↓ towards Japanese aggression demonstrates that he prioritised maintaining
borders
the hard-line Nationalists in 1935 at Moscow
such a s Soviet Mongolia Additionally policy was changed depending on
of the
Anschluss ,
policy Cominiem congress
.
other European countries' aims
↑ on collective
for expansion , such as the Soviet stance
Cominter ↑ sent
imposed security against Fascism When Hitler imposed Anschluss or the m ay 700
,
↓
↑
Sudden switch after the Munich Conference· Staling focus o n Socialism in men gso picnes +
November 1937-
,
one country as well as Litronor's The USSR
·
focus on collective security did influence ↑00 tanks to -
+
Spanish
Hitler prepared for foreign
policy, However these aims often came into conflict. The need to Civil wa r
Britain, establish the ussh was also influential , but
only to an extent as the Use had the promotion of Suppor meRepublicans
war
Y Between the
already by
concerned
this time established itself as a European power, and Stalin was more collective security
and fascism
France With Soviet Security Finally
.
,
the attitudes of other countries affected policy against
but
anti-Soviet Of USSR
this was
mainly concerning Soviet borders
↑ Therefore ,
Staling
thriving
the most
make a
Hewanted eate foreign policy was
influence rivals
↑
which
eastern states Furmer o -
his own
the ↑
-
by
Litun or Capitalist driven by
As Stalin made the Western
↑ Y powers ideology of
France
Litrinov proposed and broke alliances ↑
Socialism
in one
whereas Britain +
triple act of depending on other reflected
his
explains
Stalins focus
coury
as well as
a pro-Europe
to
gave garantee
a
mutual ↑
Stence's Standpoint on the USSR's
security
Litvinous collective
↑ security
poiend assistence X
1932 97 % of
Staling
foreign
1939
By
↑ Litvinous
↑
in
Socialism
proposal imports came from
Germany
policy wasdriven ↑
one county ↑
to protect
influence from by the need X good
relations with as
only country
a sphere of April CONCLUSION Germany kept
XIDEOLOGY
Romania Soviet borders to make significant long-term loans to
Finland to
1939 USSR
including
the
Y ↑ ↑ -
agreement of mutual
assistance
ozechoslovakia
and
with France
Baltic POLICY IN THE and Germany
STALINS FOREIGN
YSSR
between
states - SOVIET DRIVEN Y good for
Russia would 1939 WAS 1928-32
YEARS 1929 to
BORDERS IN
USSR's reputation
- - ↑
gain half TO PROTECT may , a3s
SOLELY BY THE NEED
as
a rise in supporter of
there was Collective
TERMS OF OTHER
Staling concern collaboration security
of poland X economic X
SOVIET BORDERS
for security ↓ Poland
↓
USSR and
↑ EUROPEAN COUNTRIES THE NEED TO ESTABLISH non-aggression
A pact with
Y Y ↓ ↓ USSR INTERNATIONALLY
>
-
December
X
a
past made into
year
ATTITUDE OF 1932 ten
was the 1934
Germany August agreement in
only way
to 1939
September
1934
SOVIET BORDERS OTHER COUNTRIES
↓
need to ensure
↓
of Capitalist
↓ Overall the the league It was full o f
Step war OF
M the Nazi f IN TERMS ↓
failure of France +
that the
USSR would
economic
and
not
nations I counties
to join
yet still
chose
JAPAN
i n to
The USSR slip
Soviet part Britain to support diplomatic
isolation snown in his
↓
join the
/ ↑ stalin Republicans
in
motivated foreign poicy
>
-
trade
and Manchurian the Staling
Lenin had previously
Y agreements
-
Hitler didn't league or Soviets
↓ Crisis 1937 Spain discouraged an a alliances described it a s the
nations joining Litvinor in his use was excluded with Capitalist
mind Staling plans war between for collective from it
Robbers den
the league
↓
strive countries
to take over Eastern security
of Nations Japan and theSoviets X
Europe has launched ↓ was
Japan ↓
However the pact
May to Sept the Munich activated
who were set on ↓ from a war of agression Therefore, the
conference
>
-
never
actually
did not
It
denied
severely
1939 in chind attitudes of
as France ↓ any
expansion driven
partly
oth er
1938 hopes of
by
Stalin and
↓ ↓
countries dictated
take action
anti Hitler
an
↑
·
100, 000 troops and Stalin's foreign policy
us fear of over serious threat to Y alliance
ThereforeStavin
prioritised and aircraft as foreign actions the Japanese
rise of Japan ranks USSR the battle at ↓
Soviet 1 000 him to undertake
invasion of
maintaining
-
, forced
↓ Khalkhin Gol in
Y what could be called chind this
arguably
Borders by taking
seemed
Y increased by a
1
zig-zag policy
Soviet Mongolia
↓ drove Mototors
who
an agressive convinced signing of the
set on Anti-comintern ↓ arguably forced
stance use of need to Italy
which Nazi-Soviet
against S military militarily
--
pact between Japan and Germany 75 % the
the USSR
pact
expansion
remain joined in November of
Far tast
signed November 1936
me strong
in
1937 Axis alliance
'
Japanese troops and
↓
a
and German
Japanese agression killed general major
policy shift
in Europe
policy of
told his
generals to prepare for March was driven
overall staling foreign policy during these
years mainly supporting 'popular fronts' abroad
war
an expensive against >
-
1938
,
to protect Soviet borders. Stalius
firmly defensive approach X
by the need
figur against
7 This became official doctrine
Cechslovakia an polene ↓ towards Japanese aggression demonstrates that he prioritised maintaining
borders
the hard-line Nationalists in 1935 at Moscow
such a s Soviet Mongolia Additionally policy was changed depending on
of the
Anschluss ,
policy Cominiem congress
.
other European countries' aims
↑ on collective
for expansion , such as the Soviet stance
Cominter ↑ sent
imposed security against Fascism When Hitler imposed Anschluss or the m ay 700
,
↓
↑
Sudden switch after the Munich Conference· Staling focus o n Socialism in men gso picnes +
November 1937-
,
one country as well as Litronor's The USSR
·
focus on collective security did influence ↑00 tanks to -
+
Spanish
Hitler prepared for foreign
policy, However these aims often came into conflict. The need to Civil wa r
Britain, establish the ussh was also influential , but
only to an extent as the Use had the promotion of Suppor meRepublicans
war
Y Between the
already by
concerned
this time established itself as a European power, and Stalin was more collective security
and fascism
France With Soviet Security Finally
.
,
the attitudes of other countries affected policy against
but
anti-Soviet Of USSR
this was
mainly concerning Soviet borders
↑ Therefore ,
Staling
thriving
the most
make a
Hewanted eate foreign policy was
influence rivals
↑
which
eastern states Furmer o -
his own
the ↑
-
by
Litun or Capitalist driven by
As Stalin made the Western
↑ Y powers ideology of
France
Litrinov proposed and broke alliances ↑
Socialism
in one
whereas Britain +
triple act of depending on other reflected
his
explains
Stalins focus
coury
as well as
a pro-Europe
to
gave garantee
a
mutual ↑
Stence's Standpoint on the USSR's
security
Litvinous collective
↑ security
poiend assistence X
1932 97 % of
Staling
foreign
1939
By
↑ Litvinous
↑
in
Socialism
proposal imports came from
Germany
policy wasdriven ↑
one county ↑
to protect
influence from by the need X good
relations with as
only country
a sphere of April CONCLUSION Germany kept
XIDEOLOGY
Romania Soviet borders to make significant long-term loans to
Finland to
1939 USSR
including
the
Y ↑ ↑ -
agreement of mutual
assistance
ozechoslovakia
and
with France
Baltic POLICY IN THE and Germany
STALINS FOREIGN
YSSR
between
states - SOVIET DRIVEN Y good for
Russia would 1939 WAS 1928-32
YEARS 1929 to
BORDERS IN
USSR's reputation
- - ↑
gain half TO PROTECT may , a3s
SOLELY BY THE NEED
as
a rise in supporter of
there was Collective
TERMS OF OTHER
Staling concern collaboration security
of poland X economic X
SOVIET BORDERS
for security ↓ Poland
↓
USSR and
↑ EUROPEAN COUNTRIES THE NEED TO ESTABLISH non-aggression
A pact with
Y Y ↓ ↓ USSR INTERNATIONALLY
>
-
December
X
a
past made into
year
ATTITUDE OF 1932 ten
was the 1934
Germany August agreement in
only way
to 1939
September
1934
SOVIET BORDERS OTHER COUNTRIES
↓
need to ensure
↓
of Capitalist
↓ Overall the the league It was full o f
Step war OF
M the Nazi f IN TERMS ↓
failure of France +
that the
USSR would
economic
and
not
nations I counties
to join
yet still
chose
JAPAN
i n to
The USSR slip
Soviet part Britain to support diplomatic
isolation snown in his
↓
join the
/ ↑ stalin Republicans
in
motivated foreign poicy
>
-
trade
and Manchurian the Staling
Lenin had previously
Y agreements
-
Hitler didn't league or Soviets
↓ Crisis 1937 Spain discouraged an a alliances described it a s the
nations joining Litvinor in his use was excluded with Capitalist
mind Staling plans war between for collective from it
Robbers den
the league
↓
strive countries
to take over Eastern security
of Nations Japan and theSoviets X
Europe has launched ↓ was
Japan ↓
However the pact
May to Sept the Munich activated
who were set on ↓ from a war of agression Therefore, the
conference
>
-
never
actually
did not
It
denied
severely
1939 in chind attitudes of
as France ↓ any
expansion driven
partly
oth er
1938 hopes of
by
Stalin and
↓ ↓
countries dictated
take action
anti Hitler
an
↑
·
100, 000 troops and Stalin's foreign policy
us fear of over serious threat to Y alliance
ThereforeStavin
prioritised and aircraft as foreign actions the Japanese
rise of Japan ranks USSR the battle at ↓
Soviet 1 000 him to undertake
invasion of
maintaining
-
, forced
↓ Khalkhin Gol in
Y what could be called chind this
arguably
Borders by taking
seemed
Y increased by a
1
zig-zag policy
Soviet Mongolia
↓ drove Mototors
who
an agressive convinced signing of the
set on Anti-comintern ↓ arguably forced
stance use of need to Italy
which Nazi-Soviet
against S military militarily
--
pact between Japan and Germany 75 % the
the USSR
pact
expansion
remain joined in November of
Far tast
signed November 1936
me strong
in
1937 Axis alliance
'
Japanese troops and
↓
a
and German
Japanese agression killed general major
policy shift
in Europe
