Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
23
Qualité
A+
Publié le
02-02-2025
Écrit en
2024/2025

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam Questions and Answers 100% Pass APPEAL TO AUTHORITY - Illegitimately arguing that a statement is true because an authority fi1111 said so, especially when the statement is outside the authority figure's :111 .1 , ,I expertise. Philosophy is useless. 7he astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said so. AD HOMINEM (AGAINST THE PERSON) - Criticizing the person who makes a claim or argument rather than criticizing the claim or argument itself PERSON 1: 7he federal government shouldn't raise the minimum wage because that would lead to a lot of poor people losing their jobs. PERSON 2: You don't really care about poor people! You're just a se(fish, rich jerk who is worried that goods and services will become more expensive for you personally if the minimum wage goes up. ANECDOTAL FALLACY - Using personal anecdotes or vivid examples, rather than adequate data, to support a broad generalization. 2Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 My great-grandmother smoked four packs a day for seventy years, and she never, got lung cancer. 7herefore, cigarettes don't really cause lung cancer. APPEAL TO IGNORANCE (AD IGNORATIUM) - Arguing that something is true because it can't be proven false. PERSON 1: Airplanes are secretly spraying chemicals to control our minds! PERSON 2: 7hat s a nonsense conspiracy theory. PERSON 1: Can you prove that its not happening? APPEAL TO NATURE - Arguing that something is good because it's natural or that it's bad because it's unnatural or artificial. It's much better to treat illness using natural herbs than with pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals are full of artificial chemicals! APPEAL TO POPULARITY (AD POPULUM) - Arguing that something is true because everyone believes it or that something is good because everyone likes it. Most Americans agree that the death penalty deters crime. 7herefore, the death penalty does deter crime. CIRCULAR REASONING (BEGGING THE QUESTION) - Including or assuming your conclusion as one of your premises-often as a hidden

Montrer plus Lire moins
Établissement
Logical Fallacies
Cours
Logical Fallacies










Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Logical Fallacies
Cours
Logical Fallacies

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
2 février 2025
Nombre de pages
23
Écrit en
2024/2025
Type
Examen
Contenu
Questions et réponses

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

Logical Fallacies - Week 12 & 13 Exam
Questions and Answers 100% Pass


APPEAL TO AUTHORITY - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that a statement is true because

an authority fi1111 said so, especially when the statement is outside the authority

figure's :111 .1 , ,I expertise.


Philosophy is useless. 7he astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said so.


AD HOMINEM (AGAINST THE PERSON) - ✔✔Criticizing the person who makes a

claim or argument rather than criticizing the claim or argument itself


PERSON 1: 7he federal government shouldn't raise the minimum wage because that

would lead to a lot of poor people losing their jobs.


PERSON 2: You don't really care about poor people! You're just a se(fish, rich jerk who

is worried that goods and services will become more expensive for you personally if the

minimum wage goes up.


ANECDOTAL FALLACY - ✔✔Using personal anecdotes or vivid examples, rather than

adequate data, to support a broad generalization.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 1

,My great-grandmother smoked four packs a day for seventy years, and she never, got

lung cancer. 7herefore, cigarettes don't really cause lung cancer.


APPEAL TO IGNORANCE (AD IGNORATIUM) - ✔✔Arguing that something is true

because it can't be proven false. PERSON 1: Airplanes are secretly spraying chemicals to

control our minds! PERSON 2: 7hat s a nonsense conspiracy theory.


PERSON 1: Can you prove that its not happening?


APPEAL TO NATURE - ✔✔Arguing that something is good because it's natural or that

it's bad because it's unnatural or artificial.


It's much better to treat illness using natural herbs than with pharmaceuticals.

Pharmaceuticals are full of artificial chemicals!


APPEAL TO POPULARITY (AD POPULUM) - ✔✔Arguing that something is true

because everyone believes it or that something is good because everyone likes it.


Most Americans agree that the death penalty deters crime. 7herefore, the death penalty

does deter crime.


CIRCULAR REASONING (BEGGING THE QUESTION) - ✔✔Including or assuming

your conclusion as one of your premises-often as a hidden premise.


PERRSON 1: 7his salesman is trustworthy; he's not going to try to sell me something I

don't need just to get the commission.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 2

, PERSON 2: How do you know?


PERSON 1: He told me that all he wants is to help me find the best deal.


COMPOSITION - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that because something is true of each part

of something, it's also true of the whole; or that because something is true of each

member of a group, it's true of the group as a whole.


My greenhouse gas emissions don't make any difference to the climate. Nor does my

neighbor's, or my friend's, or any other individual's emissions. 1herefore, humanity's

greenhouse gas emissions don't make any difference to the climate.


DIVISION - ✔✔Illegitimately arguing that because something is true of a group or thing

as a whole, it's also true of each part.


The United States is rich. 1herefore, all Americans are rich.


EQUIVOCATION - ✔✔Using the same word or phrase in two different ways to make it

seem like an argument that works when it really doesn't.


This school is a drug-free zone. Caffeine is a drug, and coffee has caffeine in it.

Therefore coffee isn't allowed in this school


FALSE DICHOTOMY (FALSE DILEMMA) - ✔✔Falsely assuming that there are only

two options in order to argue for oa11 111 1hcm simply by arguing against the other.




Brittie Donald, All Rights Reserved © 2025 3
10,91 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien


Document également disponible en groupe

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
BrittieDonald Howard Community College
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
399
Membre depuis
2 année
Nombre de followers
162
Documents
20443
Dernière vente
1 semaine de cela
BrittieDonald Study Solutions.

Get Help in Your Due Online and Actual Exams, Assignments with Well Researched and Up-to date Study Materials for Guaranteed Success

3,4

83 revues

5
35
4
13
3
7
2
5
1
23

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions