Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resume

Samenvatting cursus Legal English HBR15A

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
72
Publié le
12-01-2026
Écrit en
2024/2025

Dit is een samenvatting van de cursus dat professor Aliki Gilly Aurelie Anne, online plaatst om haar hoorcolleges te ondersteunen. Ik behaalde een 17/20 voor dit vak.

Établissement
Cours











Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Publié le
12 janvier 2026
Nombre de pages
72
Écrit en
2024/2025
Type
Resume

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

Legal English 2024-2025 | Gwen Verbist


Legal english


Introduction
Contract law ! used mostly in English law
Parliament and parliamentary law =
Liberal judges vs originalist judges in US supreme court
L judges = interpret the words of the constitutions ( as itw as written 350y ago)
O Judges = take the words literally out of the constitution
Tort law = case where someone does something wrong (= suing is tort law)
! legal English is about being short-worded and clear  not too much words on finals !!!
! going to give relevant an irrelevant info on final and we have to be able to see that
difference !
 Know all your cases for the final !!!!!




1

, Legal English 2024-2025 | Gwen Verbist




Unit 1: Common law and civil law:


Section 1: From the Anglo-Saxons to the Norman invasion:
English legal system = common law (not civil law!!!)
Common law = doesn’t originate from any set of texts, but from ‘traditional expressed in
action’/ jurisprudence (= gewoonterecht)
Law of England and Wales = developed over many centuries  origins in customary laws
Anglo Saxons = first to introduce written laws on British isles ( apart from the Romans)
 First English; legislation and written text = King Aethelberth 1 of Kent (600 AD) =
“England was”
 England = divided in little kingdoms
 Only clergy could write  king relied on them for administration (= advisors)
convened in the witan (curia regis)
Legislation = definition back in the day, were instructions directed at people who already
knew the customs + contained instructions on how to govern situations (previously
discretionary)
 Early medieval society = agricultural
 Maj legal rules = ownership and treatment of land (= feodaliteit)
 Anglo-saxon legal system = basis for characteristics modern common law (jury
system, writ system,..)
9th century :
 Vikings invaded England
 Brought own law  Danelaw
o Influenced existing customary law
 Law = Danish origins
 Saxon king Alfred of Wessex (847-899)/ Alfred the great
o Unified English Kingdoms against Danes
o Divided country in shires/ counties  Governed by an ‘earl’
o Limited attempts at unifying laws of England, especially criminal law
 England still ruled by unwritten laws
 Folcrith = conflicts solved in public gatherings
 Presided by doomsman/ Shireman
 To prevent private justice with help of wise men
 Wise men : knew customs with help of oaths, ordeals and
supernatural tests
 Each county: local court; own justice =>local customs

2

, Legal English 2024-2025 | Gwen Verbist


o Enforced arbitrarily
o No judges/ lawyers
o Role of king = ensuring that all men received benefit of
customary law + maintaining peace in realm
 William the Conqueror (battle at hastings) 1066 (Wilhem van Normandië)
o Invaded England  Norman rule:
 King held all land in person
 Attributed plots of land to subjects in return of loyalty (feudal system)
 Control newly conquered territory
 Suppress uprisings
 Supervise local government
 Collect taxes
o Norman kings (especially Henry II) sent servants around realm:
 Would investigate local conflicts and declare kings law (in name of
king)
 Report judgments to king
 To incorporate and elevate local custom to national level
 Ending local control
 Eliminating arbitrary remedies
 Reinstating jury system
o Citizens sworn on oath to investigate criminal
accusations
 Aim : common law system throughout the land (law 
common law)
o Traveling judges = no local route
o  less corruption of local judges
o Circuits: Traveling judges were send on those to hear
pleas and taking over work of local course (cf. Circuit
judges and circuit courts)
o  decisions of circuits courts eventually written down
 Practice developed were past decisions = precedents
o  precedents cited in courts
 First seen as persuasive
 Later as binding authority
o Curia regis : transformed into a real court (independent from advisory council)
 Later: develop into several “high courts” (professional judges)
 Collected circuit court judgements
 Had ultimate legal authority
 ! common law not derive ultimate authority from local custom!
o Used to be in past, from king itself




3

, Legal English 2024-2025 | Gwen Verbist


Section 2: The Writ system:
King and servants would issue writs to administer justice.
Writs: Royal orders to do, or to refrain doing something. Habeas Corpus was the most
important writ.
Habeas corpus: Order to bring someone before the king’s court so that the king (or one of his
servants could verify the alleged wrong.
Ex. If someone stole your sheep, you could ask king to issue habeas corpus; which
summoned you to bring neighbour before king or one of his courts. Then king could decide
the matter
 Importance of king’s court and writs was growing, became important to know how to
access those courts and what procedures were to be followed
 Power to issue writs: gradually transferred from king to important advisor = The
chancellor (he started to standardize writs)
 Access to court = refused Unless a correct standardized writs
Standardized writs: were collected in a register of writs (register Brevium)



Section 3: The development of parliament
 Jhon (1166-1216) : lost the battle of Bouvines (1214)
o Feudal system suffered
o Loss of most English territory in France
 Eng barons rebelled against king Jhon (mad)
 “ Jhon lackland” (Jan zonder land)
 Made him sign the Magna Carta
 Limited king’s power
 No tax raises w/o consulting barons
o “No taxation without representation”
 Guarantee: no free man should be deprived of life, liberty or
property except by ‘due process of law’
 King Henry III (1216-1272):
o Failed attempts to recapture lost Fr territories
  further concessions by kings barons
o Provisions of Westminister (1259) : created ‘parliament’
 Power to approve laws that would supersede common law
 Doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty: Principle that all
legislative power in England is vested in parliament or is
derived from the authority of parliament.
 Led to decline of royal power and courts


4
7,99 €
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur
Seller avatar
gnvrechtenkulB

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
gnvrechtenkulB Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de pouvoir suivre les étudiants ou les formations
Vendu
Nouveau sur Stuvia
Membre depuis
1 semaine
Nombre de followers
0
Documents
2
Dernière vente
-

0,0

0 revues

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions