Rédigé par des étudiants ayant réussi Disponible immédiatement après paiement Lire en ligne ou en PDF Mauvais document ? Échangez-le gratuitement 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resume

Summary AQA A-level Psychology Issues and Debates Revision Notes

Note
-
Vendu
-
Pages
22
Publié le
28-06-2024
Écrit en
2023/2024

This document is detailed revision notes with all you could ever need to know on the whole AQA A-level Psychology Issues and Debates topic, including AO1 and AO3 content. The notes are subdivided into the subtopics used by the textbook. They include the content from the textbook, which has been combined with extra high-quality notes and detail given by my teachers.

Montrer plus Lire moins
Établissement
Cours

Aperçu du contenu

Issues and Debates
Gender and culture in psychology: Gender bias
Universality and bias

Psychologists are influenced by their social and historical context – may have biased
beliefs, lean towards a subjective view that may not reflect objective reality.

Bias in research may be inevitable despite claims of objectivity and value-free facts.

Bias undermines claims of universality – that conclusions apply to everyone.

May lead to misrepresentation.

Hare-Mustin and Marecek: 2 types of gender bias…



Alpha bias

Exaggerates differences

Often seen as fixed and inevitable, real and enduring

Heighten or devalue females, encourages stereotypes – real and enduring differences
may be beneficial

Caused by trying to avoid universality

e.g. Freud’s psychosexual development:

1. During phallic stage boys and girls develop desire for opposite-sex parent
2. Boy = castration anxiety then identifies with father, girls ‘penis envy’
3. But girl’s eventual identification with same-sex parent is weaker
4. So her Superego is weaker (because it develops by taking on the same-sex
parent’s moral perspective)
5. So girls/women are morally inferior

Said anxiety was a ‘female’ symptom, called it ‘hysteria’.

Saw femininity as a failed form of masculinity.

Can sometimes favour women e.g. Chodorow: daughters and mothers have a greater
connectedness than sons and mothers due to biological similarities – due to child’s
closeness, women develop better abilities to bond with others and emphasise.

Evolutionary theory of relationships – male promiscuity is normal and acceptable –
unlimited supply of male sex cells, promiscuity in women is abnormal and
unacceptable.



Beta bias

Ignores/underestimates differences

,We assume research findings apply to both sexes even when females have been
excluded from research

Often androcentric e.g. Asch’s conformity studies

Cause by trying to assume universality

e.g. fight or flight research – biological research uses male animals to avoid hormonal
changes due to ovulation.

Early research assumed males and females responded to threatening situations with
fight or flight.

Can prompt more research e.g. Taylor

Taylor et al.: not true – tend and befriend – love hormone oxytocin more plentiful in
females, women respond to stress by increasing its production --> tend and befriend,
looking after others.

Misrepresentation of females and males e.g. attachment – emotional role provided
solely by mothers, research on fathers show they can do this too



Androcentrism

Alpha and beta are consequences of androcentrism

Male-dominated e.g. APA’s list of 100 most influential psychologists of the 20 th century
included 6 women – produced by males, for males, about males.

Female behaviour has been ignored, misunderstood and pathologised, subjected to
category of premenstrual syndrome e.g. medicalising female emotions e.g. anger by
explaining these in hormonal terms.

Male anger, on the other hand, is often seen as a rational response to external
pressures (Brescoll and Uhlmann).



Evaluation
 Biological vs social explanations
o Gender differences often presented as fixed and enduring when they are
not
o Maccoby and Jacklin: several studies, concluded girls have superior verbal
ability and boys better spatial
o Suggested these differences are ‘hardwired’ into the brain before birth
o Widely reported, seen as facts
o Joel et al.: used brain scanning, found no such differences in brain
structure or processing
o M&J may have been publicised as it fitted existing stereotypes of girls as
‘speakers’ and boys as ‘doers’
o Should be wary – findings may be explained by social stereotypes not
biological facts

, COUNTERPOINT

o Doesn’t mean we should avoid studying possible gender differences in the
brain
o Ingalhalikar et al: idea that females are better at multitasking as they
have better connected hemispheres may have biological truth to it
o Harasty: females have larger Broca’s areas
o Women’s brains may have better connections between hemispheres
o So may be biological differences but should be careful in exaggerating
their effect on behaviour
o More research needed
 Increasing value of women
o Discussion about gender bias in research --> nowadays look to reduce it
and increase value of women in society
o Cornwell: females better at learning as more attentive and organised –
positive attributes of women
o Males and females do possess differences
o Can develop theories emphasising important of women
o Overcome sexist attitudes and gender bias in research publications
 Sexism in research
o Gender bias promotes sexism in research
o Women underrepresented in university departments esp. in science
o Psychology’s undergraduate intake is mainly female but psychology
lecturers more likely to be male (Murphy et al.)
o More likely that research is conducted by males – may disadvantage
female ppts e.g. placed in inequitable relationships with predominantly
male researchers, female concerns not reflected in research qs
o E.g. male researcher may expect females to be irrational and unable to
complete complex tasks – negatively label, expectations may mean
female ppts underperform in research studies
o Institutional structures and psychological methods may produce gender-
biased findings
 Gender-biased research
o Research challenging gender biases may not be published
o Formanowicz et al.: analysed over 1000 articles relating to gender bias,
published over 8 years
o Research on gender bias funded less often and is published by less
prestigious journals
o So fewer scholars were aware of it or applied it in their work
o Researchers argued that this still held true when gender bias was
compared to other kinds of bias e.g. ethnic + when other factors were
controlled e.g. author’s gender and methodology used
o Gender bias not taken as seriously as other kinds of bias
 Real-life implications
o Creates misleading assumptions about female behaviour
o Fails to challenge stereotypes
o Validates discriminatory practices

Livre connecté

École, étude et sujet

Niveau d'études
Editeur
Sujet
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Livre entier ?
Non
Quels chapitres sont résumés ?
Issues and debates
Publié le
28 juin 2024
Nombre de pages
22
Écrit en
2023/2024
Type
RESUME

Sujets

€8,83
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Mauvais document ? Échangez-le gratuitement Dans les 14 jours suivant votre achat et avant le téléchargement, vous pouvez choisir un autre document. Vous pouvez simplement dépenser le montant à nouveau.
Rédigé par des étudiants ayant réussi
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
Lire en ligne ou en PDF


Document également disponible en groupe

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
eilisboden King Edward VI School
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de suivre les étudiants ou les cours
Vendu
11
Membre depuis
1 année
Nombre de followers
0
Documents
23
Dernière vente
1 mois de cela

4,8

6 revues

5
5
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
0

Documents populaires

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions