Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Non-fatal offences against the person €24,54   Ajouter au panier

Notes de cours

Non-fatal offences against the person

 5 vues  0 achat
  • Cours
  • Établissement

key cases, lecture notes

Aperçu 2 sur 8  pages

  • 20 janvier 2022
  • 8
  • 2020/2021
  • Notes de cours
  • John
  • Toutes les classes
avatar-seller
Non-fatal Offences Against the Person
Lecture 8
Fatal offences: murder & manslaughter
Note to self: Not every offence requires intention; for a lot of offences recklessness is
important
 The ‘modern’ approach to crimes of violence systematises the worst forms of personal
violence
 Excepting the common law offences of assault and battery, the majority of offences (non-
fatal) now stem from the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 go to source for
offences against the person = rule
o “the act is itself largely a consolidation of previous statutes governing the law of
violence. Frequent changes to the law have left it in on incoherent and confusing
state, with more provisions repealed than currently in force”
 The reason we have non-fatal offences is because the law protects the right to bodily
integrity; the right not to be touched against your wishes.
o For example: sexual offences (but there is an overlap between the two)

Non-fatal offences:
1. Assault (common law but charged under Criminal Justice Act 1988)
2. Battery (common law but charged under Criminal Justice Act 1988)
Both have developed over the years through case law but charged under statute over the
years. The CJA legislation does not set out the individual elements of battery and assault but
they are sort of the codified version of it.

Assault and battery are contrary to common law but the three main offences that are contrary
to the 1861 act are very important:
Lateral offences: least serious to most serious in terms of sentencing
Least serious is assault and battery and them follows:
 S. 47 OAPA (ABH) – below s. 20; actual bodily harm
 S. 20 OAPA (GBH) – below s.18 – no mens rea present
 S. 18 OAPA (GBH with intent) – very serious at the top; just below murder in terms
of seriousness

Things to consider:
 Now we are looking at offences where someone hasn’t died, but there is still some
assault; it’s an offence against the person
 Remember, when we are thinking about manslaughter, for example, someone has
died but there is a base offence which is constructive manslaughter
 Things like assault, battery and actual bodily harm can form the basis of
constructive manslaughter
o For example: the punch case; someone punches someone and the person dies.
This is not murder because they didn’t intent to kill or cause GBH. But if
there’s a base offence of assault and the person has died, that could be
manslaughter
o THIS IS WHY THIS LECTURE IS VERY IMPORTANT = to put all these
pieces together

, Assault

Criminal Justice Act 1988 s. 39
 Remember this is a common law offence but when it is charged, it is charged
contrary/under this legislation
 Assault did start with the criminal justice act; it existed years before
 Legislation doesn’t include elements of offence (actus reus and mens rea of offence is
found within common law). It only includes statutory provision of the offence (ex. fine
not exceed level 5 or no more than 6 months imprisonment) because it is charged in the
magistrate court. MC maximum prison time someone can be tried in MC is 6 months.

Actus reus of assault:
 Making someone apprehend the application of immediate force
Mens rea
 Intention or recklessness as to making someone apprehend the application of immediate
force

Particular Elements

R v Contanza 1997 Crim LR 576
1. Must be fear of ‘immediate’ or ‘imminent unlawful personal violence’
a. “At some time not excluding the immediate future”
b. D harassed victim writing to her front door and the victim suffered depression
c. Issue: was there fear of immediate personal violence
d. Court: the victim can apprehend the fear in the future
R v Ireland and Burstowe 1997 UKHL 34
2. Words alone
a. A fear of possible violence may suffice and it may be suffered where V is unsure
as to when exactly the threatened attack may occur
b. D made large number of phone call to women and stayed silent
c. One woman suffered psychological harm because of this
d. Courts said a fear of a possible violence is enough where V is unsure when the
attack could happen. Exactly how the fear is created is immaterial; whether its by
word, silence, or even writing. But there must be identification of violence where
the person subjectively felt it; fear of violence is subjective here.
Lodgon v DPP 1976 Crim LR 121
3. Defendant’s intention
a. D showed V a gun and told him he would keep him hostage
b. But the gun was fake so D argued that because gun was fake it was impossible for
him to actual carry it out
c. Court said: No, the fact that he had created a fear of violence was sufficient.
The fact that he was incapable of carrying it out was no defence. As long as
there was apprehension from the victim subjectively, it does not matter if you
are unable to carry out the act. The focus is if the person subjectively was
able to apprehend unlawful personal violence.
Afolabi v CPS 2017 EWHC 2960 Admin

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur Marxxj. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €24,54. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

73091 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!

Récemment vu par vous


€24,54
  • (0)
  Ajouter