PHIL 347

PHIL 347 Quiz 1 |Complete Questions with A+ Graded Answers purpose of analysis find the speakers meaning first step is to find the speaker's conclusion and premises argument *-two or more declarative statements, at least one of which serves as evidence to support the truth or probable truth of the other. -not a quarrel, or a disagreement or a debate. claim refers to the statement that the maker of the argument is seeking to show is true or probably true, the conclusion Rea...

PHIL 347 Quiz 1 |Complete Questions with A+ Graded Answers What is the purpose of analysis? To find the speaker's meaning. What is the very first step of analysis? Find the speaker's conclusion and premises. Claim means The statement the maker of the argument is seeking to show is true or probably true, the conclusion. Claim can also be used to refer both ________ and ________. Premises; Conclusions. *The text refers to claim as the conclusion only* Argument Combina...

Phil 347 Quiz 3 Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers In conditional arguments if A then B A Therefore B is an example of: Valid form: Affirming the antecedent In conditional arguments, if A are B C is A therefore, C is B is an example of: Applying a generalization What are the two fallacies associated with deductive reasoning? Affirming the consequent and Denying the antecedent Which deductive reasonings are about relationships? Transitivity, reflexivity, and identity ...

Phil 347 FINAL Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ The logical problem of evil The world is full of evil- theist and athesit agree. All knowing god knows there is evil, all good being would stop it and all powerful could stop it. All three can not stay if evil exists. Free will defense God maximized the goodness in the world by creating free being. A free being means that we have the choice to do evil things- A choice that some of us exercise. This preserves Gods goodness...

PHIL 347 Exam 1 Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ What is the basic structure of the cosmological (kalam, craig, plato-philoponus) argument 1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause 2. the universe began to exist therefore the universe has a cause what is the first a priori argument regarding premise 2 of the Kalam The universe has to have a cause as it cannot be infinite because that implies there there is an actual infinity of real events Why can there not be a...

PHIL 347 3 Exam Complete Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ Epicurean's problem of evil 1. If God is powerful he can remove evil 2. If God is good he is willing to remove evil 3. Evil exists 4. God does not exist Assumptions of Epicurean's problem of evil 3 1. God does what he wills 2. God does what he wills right away 3. It makes sense to attribute human traits to God Decartes obj to Assumptions of Epicurean's problem of evil human concepts don't apply to inf ...

PHIL 347 Midterm Complete Exam Questions With 100% Verified Answers Moral realism - there are both objective moral truths and objective moral fallacies Moral realism steps (1) no statement is true/false except objective reality makes it so (2) there are true moral statements (3) so, moral statements are made true or false by objective reality Kant on moral realism (1) it is rationally (morally necessary) to find perfect good, since happiness comes f. complete virtue (2) there is...

PHIL 347 Exam 2 Complete Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ The Naive View Having a mental disorder itself implies something about one's freedom and moral responsibility The Nuanced View There is no general relationship between moral responsibility and psychopathology Moral Responsibility The philosophical term of art used to describe when it is appropriate to hold someone accountable for something morally significant that they've done Usually, this is tied to blam...

PHIL 347 Exam 2 Complete Study Guide Questions With 100% Verified Answers Graded A+ Consequentialism an ethical system that determines the level of goodness or evil from the effect or result of an act Deontology Approach to ethics that judges the morality (right or wrong) of an action based on the action's adherence to rules. Described as duty or obligation, because rules 'binds you to your duty' Virtue Ethics An ethical philosophy claiming that morality's primary function is t...

Week 8 Assignment Journal PHIL 347

Phil 347 Week 3 Checkpoint Quiz (100% Correct) According to the text, how do the views of stronger, more developed critical thinkers toward authority differ from those in earlier stages of cognitive development? Your Answer: The stronger more developed thinkers are considered to have more experience and are more trusted when it comes to authority, this shows more maturity. Whereas an individual that is in their early stages of cognitive development. Strong critical thinkers cultivate ...

What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? Your Answer: The three fundamental reasoning strategies are 1) comparative reasoning 2) ideological reasoning 3) empirical reasoning What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? Your Answer: Comparative Reasoning "enables us to make interpretations, draw inferences or offer explanations by relying on something that is more familiar to understand something that is less familiar" (Facione and Gittens, 20...

Question 1 4 / 4 pts What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? Your Answer: Comparative reasoning Ideological reasoning Empirical reasoning Question 2 6 / 6 pts What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? Your Answer: Comparative reasoning is a form of thinking where you basically compare two things (this is like that). This form of reasoning enables human to interpret thing, draw inferences, or offer explanations. Comparative reasoning is bas...

What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? Your Answer: The three fundamental reasoning strategies are 1) comparative reasoning 2) ideological reasoning 3) empirical reasoning What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? Your Answer: Comparative Reasoning "enables us to make interpretations, draw inferences or offer explanations by relying on something that is more familiar to understand something that is less familiar" (Facione and Gittens, 20...

American Public University - PHIL 347 / PHIL347 Week 6 Checkpoint

American Public University - PHIL 347 / PHIL347 Week 2 Checkpoint

Question 1 5 / 5 pts Based on what you have read in the text, the lecture, and any other sources you find helpful to your understanding of deductive arguments, explain the structure of a deductive argument in your own words. Your Answer: A deductive argument typically has two premises and a conclusion based on those premises. In order for the conclusion to be true, the premises must be true as well. Therefore, if the premises are true, the conclusion will certainly be true. Deductive re...

. The Final Exam is open book and open notes. The maximum time you can spend in the exam is 3 hours. If you have not clicked the Submit quiz button by then, you will be exited from the exam automatically. 2. Reminders:  You will only be able to enter your online Final Exam one time  If you lose your Internet connection during your Final Exam, logon again and try to access your Final Exam. If you are unable to enter the Final Exam, contact first the help desk and then your instructor...