100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

AEP Final Exam Questions with Correct Answers Latest Update 2025/2026

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
13
Grado
A+
Subido en
18-12-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

AEP Final Exam Questions with Correct Answers Latest Update 2025/2026 ECochG latency - Answers 0-2 ms ECochG analysis method - Answers time (waveform) ECochG generator - Answers hair cells, auditory nerve ECochG ex/en - Answers exogenous ABR latency - Answers 1-10 ms ABR analysis method - Answers time (waveform) ABR generator - Answers auditory nerve, brainstem ABR ex/en - Answers exogenous MLR latency - Answers 15-35 ms MLR analysis method - Answers time (waveform) MLR generator - Answers subcortical, cortical MLR ex/en - Answers exogenous LAEP (LLR, P1-N1-P2) latency - Answers 50-250 ms LAEP analysis method - Answers time (waveform) LAEP generator - Answers cortical LAEP ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, mainly exogenous MMN latency - Answers 150-300 ms MMN analysis method - Answers time (waveform subtraction) MMN generator - Answers cortical MMN ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, mainly endogenous P300 latency - Answers 250-400 ms P300 analysis method - Answers time (waveform) P300 generator - Answers cortical P300 ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, mainly endogenous ASSR latency - Answers 10-30 ms ASSR analysis method - Answers frequency (spectrum) ASSR generator - Answers brainstem, subcortical, cortical (dependent on modulation rate) ASSR ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, but mainly exogenous What are the common components in AEP recording systems? - Answers stimulus generator, electrodes, amplifier, filter, signal average with artifact rejection, response display (screen), response processing, and printer Stimulus factors - Answers stimulus type, intensity, phase (polarity), duration, presentation rate, monaural/binaural presentation Recording factors - Answers electrode, electrode montage, filter, analysis window, number of stimulus/trials/sweeps, artifact rejection Subject factors - Answers age gender, status, temperature, medication stimulus type - Answers click vs tone bursts stimulus intensity - Answers ABR shows a systematic increase in latency and decrease in amplitude as stimulus intensity decrease from 70-80 dB nHL to the threshold stimulus rate - Answers odd number stimulus rates are used to reduce electrical noise, slower rates provide better morphology, moderate rates can be used to expedite threshold testing, at rates about 30/s, the latency of all components of the ABR increase and the amplitude decrease, comparison of ABRs at high rates vs slower rates is used to evaluate suspected neurological lesions stimulus polarity - Answers rarefaction stimuli can elicit an ABR with slightly shorter latency and amplitude higher for the early components compared to condensation, alternating stimulus can reduce stimulus artifacts - record with rarefaction and condensation separately at first stimulus duration - Answers as the rise time increases, latency increase, amplitude decrease, and the morphology deteriorates - while longer rise time gives more frequency specificity, it will generate poorer neural synchrony stimulus frequency - Answers high frequency stimuli elicit shorter latencies than lower frequency stimuli mode of stimulation - Answers monaural vs binaural - comparison can be used to determine the binaural interaction component (BIC: left (ear response + right ear response) - binaural response) electrode montage - Answers ipsilateral vs contralateral recording filter - Answers filters are used to remove electrical activities at unwanted frequencies (typically use 100-3000 Hz for ABR), peak rounding when low pas filter cutoff decreases to 1500 but less effect on amplitude/latency, decrease the high pass filter cutoff this will result in incre

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
AEP
Grado
AEP









Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
AEP
Grado
AEP

Información del documento

Subido en
18 de diciembre de 2025
Número de páginas
13
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

AEP Final Exam Questions with Correct Answers Latest Update 2025/2026

ECochG latency - Answers 0-2 ms

ECochG analysis method - Answers time (waveform)

ECochG generator - Answers hair cells, auditory nerve

ECochG ex/en - Answers exogenous

ABR latency - Answers 1-10 ms

ABR analysis method - Answers time (waveform)

ABR generator - Answers auditory nerve, brainstem

ABR ex/en - Answers exogenous

MLR latency - Answers 15-35 ms

MLR analysis method - Answers time (waveform)

MLR generator - Answers subcortical, cortical

MLR ex/en - Answers exogenous

LAEP (LLR, P1-N1-P2) latency - Answers 50-250 ms

LAEP analysis method - Answers time (waveform)

LAEP generator - Answers cortical

LAEP ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, mainly exogenous

MMN latency - Answers 150-300 ms

MMN analysis method - Answers time (waveform subtraction)

MMN generator - Answers cortical

MMN ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, mainly endogenous

P300 latency - Answers 250-400 ms

P300 analysis method - Answers time (waveform)

P300 generator - Answers cortical

P300 ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, mainly endogenous

, ASSR latency - Answers 10-30 ms

ASSR analysis method - Answers frequency (spectrum)

ASSR generator - Answers brainstem, subcortical, cortical (dependent on modulation rate)

ASSR ex/en - Answers exogenous AND endogenous, but mainly exogenous

What are the common components in AEP recording systems? - Answers stimulus generator,
electrodes, amplifier, filter, signal average with artifact rejection, response display (screen),
response processing, and printer

Stimulus factors - Answers stimulus type, intensity, phase (polarity), duration, presentation rate,
monaural/binaural presentation

Recording factors - Answers electrode, electrode montage, filter, analysis window, number of
stimulus/trials/sweeps, artifact rejection

Subject factors - Answers age gender, status, temperature, medication

stimulus type - Answers click vs tone bursts

stimulus intensity - Answers ABR shows a systematic increase in latency and decrease in
amplitude as stimulus intensity decrease from 70-80 dB nHL to the threshold

stimulus rate - Answers odd number stimulus rates are used to reduce electrical noise, slower
rates provide better morphology, moderate rates can be used to expedite threshold testing, at
rates about 30/s, the latency of all components of the ABR increase and the amplitude decrease,
comparison of ABRs at high rates vs slower rates is used to evaluate suspected neurological
lesions

stimulus polarity - Answers rarefaction stimuli can elicit an ABR with slightly shorter latency and
amplitude higher for the early components compared to condensation, alternating stimulus can
reduce stimulus artifacts - record with rarefaction and condensation separately at first

stimulus duration - Answers as the rise time increases, latency increase, amplitude decrease,
and the morphology deteriorates - while longer rise time gives more frequency specificity, it will
generate poorer neural synchrony

stimulus frequency - Answers high frequency stimuli elicit shorter latencies than lower
frequency stimuli

mode of stimulation - Answers monaural vs binaural - comparison can be used to determine the
binaural interaction component (BIC: left (ear response + right ear response) - binaural response)

electrode montage - Answers ipsilateral vs contralateral recording
$11.39
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
TutorJosh Chamberlain College Of Nursing
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
342
Miembro desde
1 año
Número de seguidores
16
Documentos
28610
Última venta
1 día hace
Tutor Joshua

Here You will find all Documents and Package Deals Offered By Tutor Joshua.

3.6

53 reseñas

5
18
4
14
3
12
2
0
1
9

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes