Complete Answers
\Q\.attractive nuisance doctrine - ANSWERS✔-a defendant is negligent if (a) there is an
artificially dangerous condition on the land; (b) the landowner knows that children are likely to
trespass; (c) the trespassing child does not understand the danger at hand; (d) maintaining the
dangerous condition is not worth the risk of someone being injured; and (e) the landowner has
not acted to remove the danger
\Q\.duty to inspect and make safe - ANSWERS✔-this duty extends to members of the public,
considered invitees who visit stores, airports, museums, and other public places
\Q\.duty to warn of any dangerous conditions - ANSWERS✔-extends to social guests, who are
referred to as licensees
\Q\.negligence per se or negligence by itself - ANSWERS✔-violating a statutory standard of care
\Q\.proximate legal cause - ANSWERS✔-if the defendant's actions are a substantial factor in
causing the plaintiff's injuries
\Q\.reasonable person standard - ANSWERS✔-under this standard, a person has a duty to act as
a sensible person would act under similar circumstances
\Q\.res ipsa loquitor - ANSWERS✔-negligence is presumed by the nature of the accident
\Q\.zone of danger - ANSWERS✔-an area where injury would likely occur following an
unexpected and dangerous incident