100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
769
Grado
A+
Subido en
15-12-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025 | Halstead & Billings | 20 MCQs/Chapter (148 characters) 2) SEO Product Description (200–300 words) The Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions — Test Bank (2025) is a comprehensive, graduate-level assessment resource aligned to Halstead & Billings’ gold-standard educator textbook (1st Edition). Designed specifically for nurse educators and health professions faculty, this test bank supports deep mastery of teaching, curriculum, and assessment competencies essential for success in academic and clinical educator roles. Each chapter includes 20 rigorously developed, high-discrimination multiple-choice questions with verified answers and evidence-based rationales. Items are written at the analysis, evaluation, and synthesis levels, reflecting the real-world decision-making demands of classroom, clinical, simulation, and online teaching environments. This resource is ideal for MSN-Education and PhD in Nursing Education learners, as well as faculty development programs onboarding clinicians into teaching roles across nursing and allied health disciplines. Questions emphasize practical application—helping users translate educational theory into confident instructional practice. What’s Included Full-chapter coverage aligned to the 2025 edition 20 graduate-level MCQs per chapter Verified correct answers with clear, educator-focused rationales Coverage of curriculum development, instructional design, clinical teaching, assessment strategies, simulation pedagogy, learning technologies, evaluation, and classroom management Written for faculty readiness, teaching confidence, and role transition Whether used for exam preparation, course reinforcement, faculty onboarding, or self-assessment, this test bank strengthens instructional judgment, assessment literacy, and educator role socialization—making it an essential companion for anyone teaching in nursing or the health professions. 3) 8 High-Value SEO Keywords nursing educator test bank 2025 Halstead and Billings test bank teaching in nursing education questions health professions educator test bank MSN nursing education exam questions faculty development nursing education clinical teaching assessment MCQs nursing education pedagogy test bank 4) 10 Optimized Hashtags #NursingEducation #NurseEducator #FacultyDevelopment #TeachingInNursing #HealthProfessionsEducation #MSNEducation #NursingFaculty #EducatorTestBank #AcademicNursing #ClinicalTeaching

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
NCLEX RN
Grado
NCLEX RN











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
NCLEX RN
Grado
NCLEX RN

Información del documento

Subido en
15 de diciembre de 2025
Número de páginas
769
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

GETTING STARTED IN TEACHING FOR
NURSING AND THE HEALTH
PROFESSIONS
1ST EDITION
• AUTHOR(S)JUDITH A. HALSTEAD;
DIANE M. BILLINGS


TEST BANK
1
Reference
Ch. 1 — Introduction to Curriculum Development
Stem
A nursing department is revising its graduate-level curriculum to
move from discipline-based courses to integrated competency
strands. As the faculty lead, you must decide which curriculum
mapping approach will best reveal gaps across competency
domains and clinical experiences. Which mapping strategy best


Page | 1

,balances program-level outcomes, course objectives, and
authentic assessment alignment?
A. Map only course objectives to program outcomes and rely on
faculty judgment to infer assessment alignment.
B. Create a matrix linking program outcomes → course
objectives → specific authentic assessments, then analyze for
redundancy and gaps.
C. Map competency domains to clinical placement hours,
assuming time on task equates to competency attainment.
D. Use a checklist of topics covered in each course without tying
items to program outcomes.
Correct answer
B
Rationale — Correct (B)
A full matrix (program outcomes → objectives → assessments)
provides explicit alignment and makes gaps or redundant
coverage visible; it supports evidence-based curriculum
decisions and accountability for competency attainment. This
approach aligns with integrated curriculum design principles by
connecting outcomes with measurable assessments across
courses. It enables targeted remediation or consolidation based
on mapped evidence.
Rationale — Incorrect
A. Mapping only objectives to outcomes without linking
assessments fails to demonstrate how outcomes are measured
and risks hidden assessment misalignment.
Page | 2

,C. Equating clinical hours to competency ignores variability in
experience quality and lacks direct evidence of learning.
D. A topic checklist documents coverage, not alignment with
outcomes or assessment validity; it under-supports program
evaluation.
Teaching point
Map outcomes → objectives → authentic assessments to reveal
true alignment and gaps.
Citation
Halstead, J. A., & Billings, D. M. (2025). Getting Started in
Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions (1st Ed.). Ch. 1.


2
Reference
Ch. 1 — Introduction to Curriculum Development
Stem
During an initial needs analysis, student feedback indicates
inconsistent clinical supervision and unclear expectations for
interprofessional teamwork skills. As a curriculum developer,
which two actions together produce the strongest inference
about curricular causes rather than isolated implementation
problems?
A. Add a standalone interprofessional course and increase
clinical hours.
B. Conduct faculty focus groups on supervision practices and
Page | 3

, map where teamwork objectives are taught and assessed.
C. Send a department-wide memo clarifying expectations for
preceptors and instructors.
D. Replace subjective student evaluations with a new numerical
rating scale for supervision quality.
Correct answer
B
Rationale — Correct (B)
Faculty focus groups uncover implementation practices and
barriers, while mapping locates curriculum points where
teamwork should be taught and assessed. Together these
methods distinguish whether problems stem from curricular
design (missing/unclear objectives or assessments) or
inconsistent enactment. This dual approach aligns with
evidence-based program evaluation.
Rationale — Incorrect
A. Adding a course and clinical hours may not resolve
supervision inconsistency and could create redundancy without
addressing underlying alignment issues.
C. A memo is an implementation nudge but does not diagnose
curricular versus practice causes.
D. Changing the evaluation instrument addresses measurement
but not whether teamwork objectives are present or taught.
Teaching point
Combine faculty inquiry with curriculum mapping to diagnose
curricular vs. implementation problems.
Page | 4
$35.49
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
eston1

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
eston1 Princeton
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
0
Miembro desde
5 meses
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
129
Última venta
-

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes