100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
767
Grado
A+
Subido en
13-12-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025 | Halstead & Billings | 20 MCQs/Chapter 2) SEO Product Description (200–300 words) Master the transition into effective teaching with this graduate-level test bank fully aligned to Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions (1st Edition, 2025) by Judith A. Halstead & Diane M. Billings—the gold-standard guide for new and developing nurse educators. This 2025 educator test bank delivers 20 rigorously developed MCQs per chapter, each with verified correct answers and evidence-based rationales, designed specifically for MSN-Education, PhD in Nursing Education, and faculty development programs across nursing and allied health disciplines. Every question is written at the analysis, evaluation, and synthesis levels of Bloom’s taxonomy, mirroring the complex decision-making required of educators in real academic, clinical, simulation, and online teaching environments. Items emphasize instructional design, curriculum development, clinical teaching strategies, assessment literacy, learning technology integration, evaluation, and classroom management, ensuring direct relevance to educator practice—not rote recall. This test bank is ideal for new faculty onboarding, clinicians transitioning into teaching roles, and graduate learners preparing for educator responsibilities. It strengthens teaching confidence, supports academic role socialization, and reinforces evidence-based educational decision-making aligned with contemporary health professions education standards. What’s Included Full-chapter coverage of the 2025 edition 20 high-quality MCQs per chapter Verified answers with clear, educator-focused rationales Aligned with nurse educator and health professions teaching competencies Suitable for exams, self-study, faculty development, and course support If you are serious about teaching mastery in nursing and the health professions, this test bank provides the structured, practice-ready assessment support you need. 3) 8 High-Value SEO Keywords nursing educator test bank 2025 teaching in nursing test bank Halstead and Billings test bank health professions education MCQs faculty development exam questions MSN nursing education test bank PhD nursing education assessment teaching in health professions questions 4) 10 Optimized Hashtags #NursingEducation #NurseEducator #FacultyDevelopment #HealthProfessionsEducation #TeachingInNursing #MSNEducation #PhDNursingEducation #EducatorTestBank #AcademicNursing #ClinicalTeaching

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
NCLEX RN
Grado
NCLEX RN











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
NCLEX RN
Grado
NCLEX RN

Información del documento

Subido en
13 de diciembre de 2025
Número de páginas
767
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

GETTING STARTED IN TEACHING FOR
NURSING AND THE HEALTH
PROFESSIONS
1ST EDITION
• AUTHOR(S)JUDITH A. HALSTEAD;
DIANE M. BILLINGS


TEST BANK



1
Reference
Ch. 1 — Introduction to curriculum development
Stem
A nursing program is revising its curriculum after a recent
employer survey showed graduates lack proficiency in care

Page | 1

,transitions. As the faculty lead, you must prioritize curricular
changes while balancing existing accreditation standards and
limited faculty time. Which next step best aligns curriculum
development principles to ensure effective, evidence-based
change?
Options
A. Draft new course objectives on transitions immediately and
present them at the next faculty meeting.
B. Conduct a focused needs assessment that triangulates
employer feedback with graduate outcomes and clinical data.
C. Replace an elective with a required transitions course to
create space in the curriculum.
D. Assign a single experienced faculty member to redesign all
clinical courses to emphasize transitions.
Correct answer
B
Rationales
Correct (B): Conducting a focused needs assessment uses
multiple data sources to validate the employer feedback and
identify specific gaps; this aligns with curricular principles that
changes be data-driven and contextually justified before
altering outcomes or structure. It supports stakeholder
alignment and accreditation readiness.
A: Drafting objectives before confirming the scope or root
causes risks misalignment with program outcomes and may
waste faculty effort if the problem differs from surface
Page | 2

,feedback.
C: Removing an elective without assessment may harm
curricular balance and does not guarantee alignment with
program outcomes or stakeholder needs.
D: Centralizing redesign to one faculty member risks narrow
perspective, reduces shared governance, and undermines
faculty ownership and sustainability.
Teaching point
Base curriculum changes on a triangulated needs assessment,
not single feedback sources.
Citation
Halstead, J. A., & Billings, D. M. (2025). Getting Started in
Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions (1st Ed.). Ch. 1.


2
Reference
Ch. 1 — Introduction to curriculum development
Stem
During curriculum mapping, you find redundancy in content on
patient safety and a gap in content on population health.
Faculty are split: some argue redundancy reinforces learning;
others want to eliminate duplicated sessions to make room for
population health. Which curriculum principle should guide
your synthesis and decision?


Page | 3

, Options
A. Eliminate all redundancy immediately to maximize curricular
breadth.
B. Retain redundancy because repetition always improves
mastery.
C. Analyze alignment of redundant elements with program
outcomes and student level, then selectively consolidate or
scaffold.
D. Replace the redundant patient safety content with
population health content even if it reduces safety coverage.
Correct answer
C
Rationales
Correct (C): Best practice is to evaluate whether redundant
content supports progressive competence (scaffolding) or is
true duplication; selectively consolidating maintains learning
progression while freeing time for gaps. This reflects alignment
and intentional sequencing principles.
A: Eliminating all redundancy risks removing necessary
reinforcement and weakens spiraled learning.
B: Blanket retention ignores inefficiencies and misaligns with
competency sequencing; repetition must be purposeful.
D: Substituting without analysis risks undermining critical safety
competencies and accreditation expectations.



Page | 4
$39.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
anthonywaithaka

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
anthonywaithaka Princeton
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
0
Miembro desde
5 meses
Número de seguidores
1
Documentos
140
Última venta
-

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes