100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Edexcel GCE Chemistry (9CH0) Paper 3 | General & Practical Principles A+

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
45
Grado
A+
Subido en
22-10-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

Ace your Pearson Edexcel GCE Chemistry (9CH0) Paper 3: General and Practical Principles in Chemistry exam with this verified and comprehensive study resource, updated for the 2025/2026 academic year. This guide includes authentic exam-style questions with correct answers, covering key areas such as analytical techniques, titration, organic synthesis, kinetics, thermodynamics, equilibria, and experimental design. Tailored to match the Edexcel A Level Chemistry specification, this A+ graded test bank helps students apply theoretical knowledge to practical contexts while mastering data analysis and problem-solving skills. Ideal for focused revision, practice, or exam preparation, this resource ensures accuracy, clarity, and guaranteed success in Edexcel Chemistry Paper 3.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Pearson Edexcel GCE In Chemistry – Paper 3
Grado
Pearson Edexcel GCE in Chemistry – Paper 3











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Pearson Edexcel GCE in Chemistry – Paper 3
Grado
Pearson Edexcel GCE in Chemistry – Paper 3

Información del documento

Subido en
22 de octubre de 2025
Número de páginas
45
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Mark Scheme (Results)

November 2021


Pearson Edexcel GCE
In Chemistry (9CH0)
Paper 3: General and Practical Principles in
Chemistry

,Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications

Edexcel and BTEC qualifications come from Pearson, the world’s leading learning
company. We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational,
occupational and specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our
qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk for our BTEC
qualifications.

Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at
www.edexcel.com/contactus.



If you have any subject specific questions about this specification that require the help
of a subject specialist, you can speak directly to the subject team at Pearson.
Their contact details can be found on this link: www.edexcel.com/teachingservices.



You can also use our online Ask the Expert service at www.edexcel.com/ask. You will
need an Edexcel username and password to access this service.



Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere
Our aim is to help everyone progress in their lives through education. We believe in
every kind of learning, for all kinds of people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve
been involved in education for over 150 years, and by working across 70 countries, in
100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to high
standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out more
about how we can help you and your students at: www.pearson.com/uk




November 2021
Question Paper Log Number 67806
Publications Code 9CH0_03_2111_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2021

,General wMarking wGuidance



 All wcandidates wmust wreceive wthe wsame wtreatment. wExaminers wmust
wmark wthe wfirst wcandidate win wexactly wthe wsame wway was wthey wmark
wthe wlast.

 Mark w schemes w should w be w applied w positively. w Candidates w must
w be w rewarded wfor w what w they w have w shown w they w can w do w rather
w than w penalised w for w omissions.

 Examiners w should w mark w according w to w the w mark w scheme w not
w according w to wtheir wperception wof wwhere wthe wgrade wboundaries
wmay wlie.

 There wis wno wceiling won wachievement. wAll wmarks won wthe wmark
wscheme wshould wbe wused wappropriately.

 All w the wmarks won w the wmark w scheme w are w designed wto w be
w awarded. w Examiners wshould w always w award w full w marks w if
w deserved, w i.e. w if w the w answer w matches w the wmark w scheme.
w Examiners w should w also w be w prepared w to w award w zero w marks w if
wthe wcandidate’s wresponse wis wnot wworthy wof wcredit waccording wto
wthe wmark wscheme.

 Where wsome wjudgement wis wrequired, wmark wschemes wwill
wprovide wthe wprinciples w by w which w marks w will w be w awarded
w and w exemplification w may w be wlimited.

 When w examiners w are w in w doubt w regarding w the w application w of w the
w mark w scheme wto wa wcandidate’s wresponse, wthe wteam wleader wmust
wbe wconsulted.

 Crossed wout wwork wshould wbe wmarked wUNLESS wthe wcandidate whas
wreplaced wit w with wan walternative wresponse.

 Mark wschemes wwill windicate wwithin wthe wtable wwhere, wand wwhich
wstrands wof wQWC, ware wbeing wassessed. wThe wstrands ware was
wfollows:


i) ensure w that w text w is w legible w and w that w spelling, w punctuation w and
w grammar w are waccurate wso wthat wmeaning wis wclear
ii) select wand wuse wa wform wand wstyle wof wwriting wappropriate wto
wpurpose wand wto wcomplex wsubject wmatter
iii) organise winformation wclearly wand wcoherently, wusing wspecialist
wvocabulary wwhen wappropriate.

, Using wthe wmark wscheme

Examiners wshould wlook wfor wqualities wto wreward wrather wthan wfaults wto wpenalise. wThis wdoes wNOT wmean wgiving wcredit wfor
wincorrect wor winadequate w answers, w but w it w does w mean w allowing w candidates w to w be w rewarded w for w answers w showing
w correct w application w of w principles w and wknowledge. w Examiners w should w therefore w read w carefully w and w consider w every
w response: w even w if w it w is w not w what w is w expected w it w may w be w worthy wof wcredit.


The w mark wscheme wgives wexaminers:
 an widea wof wthe wtypes wof wresponse wexpected
 how w individual w marks w are w to w be w awarded
 the wtotal wmark wfor weach wquestion
 examples w of w responses w that w should w NOT w receive w credit.

/ w means w that w the w responses w are w alternatives w and w either w answer w should w receive w full w credit. w ( w ) w means w that w a
w phrase/word w is w not w essential w for wthe waward wof wthe wmark, wbut whelps wthe wexaminer wto wget wthe wsense wof wthe wexpected
wanswer.


Phrases/words win wbold windicate wthat wthe wmeaning wof wthe wphrase wor wthe wactual wword wis wessential wto wthe wanswer.
wecf/TE/cq w(error wcarried wforward) wmeans wthat wa wwrong wanswer wgiven win wan wearlier wpart wof wa wquestion wis wused wcorrectly
win wanswer wto wa wlater wpart wof wthe wsame wquestion.


Candidates w must w make w their w meaning w clear w to w the w examiner w to w gain w the w mark. w Make w sure w that w the w answer w makes
w sense. w Do w not w give wcredit wfor wcorrect wwords/phrases wwhich ware wput wtogether win wa wmeaningless wmanner. wAnswers
wmust wbe win wthe wcorrect wcontext.


Quality wof wWritten wCommunication

Questions w which w involve w the w writing w of w continuous w prose w will w expect w candidates w to:
 write w legibly, w with w accurate w use w of w spelling, w grammar w and w punctuation w in w order w to w make w the w meaning w clear
 select w and w use w a w form w and w style w of w writing w appropriate w to w purpose w and w to w complex w subject w matter
 organise winformation wclearly wand wcoherently, wusing wspecialist wvocabulary wwhen wappropriate.

Full w marks w will w be w awarded w if w the w candidate w has w demonstrated w the w above w abilities. w Questions w where w QWC w is w likely
w to w be w particularly wimportant ware windicated w(QWC) win wthe wmark wscheme, wbut wthis wdoes wnot wpreclude wothers.
$19.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Higradesstuvia Massachusetts Institute Of Technology
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
30
Miembro desde
10 meses
Número de seguidores
2
Documentos
827
Última venta
2 días hace
HIGH GRADES DOCS

High Grades Docs – Your trusted source for clear, accurate, and exam-ready study materials. We provide well-structured summaries, detailed notes, practice questions, and updated guides to help you learn faster, score higher, and stay ahead in every course. Quality, clarity, and top grades — all in one place.

4.9

14 reseñas

5
12
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes