100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Ensayo

Fintech - Disruptive Start-Up Idea in the Financial Sector

Puntuación
-
Vendido
2
Páginas
20
Grado
1
Subido en
12-01-2021
Escrito en
2020/2021

Term paper on the business plan of a disruptive fintech in the financial sector. Besides a profound market analysis and literature review, the structure of the start-up follows according to the Business Model Canvas. All interview data was obtained by myself. The term paper can be used as a template as well as inspiration for own term papers.

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Grado










Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Estudio
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
12 de enero de 2021
Número de páginas
20
Escrito en
2020/2021
Tipo
Ensayo
Profesor(es)
Desconocido
Grado
1

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Fintech

Individual graded term paper

Project Whale Killer




greenWarren



Frankfurt School of Finance & Management




Course lectured by

Anonym


Assignment submitted by

Anonym



Frankfurt, January 2021

, Table of Contents
1 Introduction & Literature Review .............................................................................. 3

2 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 4

3 Market Data, Analysis & Discussion of Research Results .......................................... 4

3.1 The market ......................................................................................................................... 4

3.2 ESG awareness .................................................................................................................. 5

3.3 Competition ....................................................................................................................... 6

3.4 The three problems in society ............................................................................................. 6

4 Business Model ............................................................................................................. 7

4.1 Our Value .......................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Key Partners ...................................................................................................................... 8

4.3 Distribution Channels ......................................................................................................... 8

4.4 Cost Structure .................................................................................................................... 8

4.5 Revenue Streams................................................................................................................ 9

4.6 Customer Segmentation & Relationship ............................................................................. 9

5 Execution plan, Key Activities and Resources & Discussion of Limitations ........... 10

6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 11

7 Appendizes ................................................................................................................. 12

8 References .................................................................................................................. 19

, 1 Introduction & Literature Review

“Banking is necessary, Banks are not” said Microsoft founder Bill Gates in 1994 underlining
the threat traditional banks and wealth manager face. Three waves of digital transformation
have affected the market by the emergence of a new era of business models changing
people’s everyday life and partially replacing traditional businesses (Jung et al., 2017). The
uprising digitalization with disruptive innovations like robo-advisors and mobile payments
force banks to adapt as they could lose market share in their traditional fields of business
(Kashyap, 2016).
Automated investments are perceived as a great chance due to lower fees, comfort and better
performance. That is why robo-advisor’s assets under management (AuM) developed into a
multi-billion and soon a multi-trillion-dollar market (Appendix 1).
In contrast, others still have doubts. Therefore, one leading robo-advisor was accused of
forcing customers “into a one-size-fits-all rebalancing algorithm” (Marotta, 2015).
Robo-advisors have the potential to change the financial system, especially when they start
replacing humans and making active fund managers obsolete (Tokic, 2018). Consequently,
many incumbents are forced to introduce their own robo-advisor, e.g. Charles Schwab.
Today, the landscape of mobile payments has become more complex as new players entered
the market such as Google, PayPal and Facebook aiming to replace cash, cards and other
payment forms (Merbecks & Bruck, 2012).
The increasing change and pressure on banks lead to the question: are banks still able to stay
in the game? Research from Dab et al. (2017) shows, banks in China and India are already
losing influence to emerging Fintechs.
But what have banks done wrong for such a development? – they have shuttered the general
trust.
First, they charge high fees of about 1.5% - 3%, but still perform inadequate. European active
fund managers were outperformed by the S&P 500 over short-and long periods of time. S&P
Global pointed out: “In 2019, 81% of euro-denominated U.S. equity funds underperformed
their benchmark. Over the 10-year period, this rate increased to over 98%”1.
greenWarren charges less and performs even better.
But most importantly, people think banks do not act in their best interest. N262 found out
only 27% of people would ask their bank for advice when they have financial concerns.
Shockingly, that number drops to only 13% in Germany. In Italy 25% think their bank only
cares about making money from them which is underlined by unexpected charges or hidden
fees approx. 67% of people have already faced. For example, 38% had to deal with ATM fees
while 40% faced overdraft fees. Less than 50% of US and Europe customers can explain
what an overdraft actually is.




1
SPIVA Europe Scorecard, 2019, S&P Global
2
N26, 16 June 2020, The Big Banking Chat: what are the biggest frustrations with banking?
$25.24
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
stefancloppenburg

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
stefancloppenburg Frankfurt School of Finance & Management
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
3
Miembro desde
4 año
Número de seguidores
2
Documentos
2
Última venta
4 año hace

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes