100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
77
Grado
A+
Subido en
22-09-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha Solution Manual for Statistics for Nursing Research A Workbook for Evidence-Based Practice 3rd Edition Susan Grove Daisha

Mostrar más Leer menos
Institución
Solution Manual For Statistics For Nursing
Grado
Solution Manual For Statistics For Nursing











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Libro relacionado

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Solution Manual For Statistics For Nursing
Grado
Solution Manual For Statistics For Nursing

Información del documento

Subido en
22 de septiembre de 2025
Número de páginas
77
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Solution Manual for| |




Statistics for Nursing | |




| Research A Workbook | |




for Evidence-Based
| |




| Practice 3rd Edition
| |




| Susan Grove Daisha
| |

, Answer Guidelines for Questions to Be Graded
| | | | | |




EXERCISE
Identifying Levels of | |
|




|
Measurement: Nominal,
|




Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio
| |
|




|
1

The |questions |are |in |bold |followed |by |answers.

1. In |Table |1, |identify |the |level |of |measurement |for |the |current |therapy |variable. |Provide |a
|rationale |for |your |answer.

Answer: |The |current |therapy |variable |was |measured |at |the |nominal |level. |These |drug |categories
|were |probably |developed |to |be |exhaustive |for |this |study |and |included |the |categories |of |drugs |the

|subjects |were |receiving. |However, |the |categories |are |not |exclusive, |since |patients |are |usually |on

|more |than |one |category |of |these |drugs |to |manage |their |health |problems. |The |current |therapies |are

|not |m easured |at |the |ordinal |level |because |they |cannot |be |r ank |ordered, |since |no |drug |category |can |be

|considered |more |or |less |beneficial |than |another |drug |category |(see |Figure |1-1; |Grove |& |Gray,

|2019).




2. What | is | the | mode | for | the | current | therapy | variable | in | this | study? | Provide | a | rationale
| for|your |answer.

Answer: | The | mode | for | current | therapy | was | β |blocker. |A | total | of | 100 | (94%) | of | the | cardiac | patients
were | receiving | this | category | of | drug, | which | was | the | most | common | prescribed | drug | for
| this|sample.




3. What |statistics |were |conducted |to |describe |the |BMI |of |the |cardiac |patients |in |this |sample?
|Discuss |whether |these |analysis |techniques |were |appropriate |or |inappropriate.

Answer: | BMI | was | described | with | a | mean | and | standard | deviation | (SD). | BMI | measurement | resulted
|in |ratio-level |data |with |continuous |values |and |an |absolute |zero |(Stone |& |Frazier, |2017). |Ratio-

|level |data |should |be |analyzed |with |parametric |statistics |such |as |the |mean |and |SD |(Grove |& |Gray,

|2017; |Knapp, |2017).




4. Researchers |used |the |following |item |to |measure |registered |nurses’ |(RNs) |income |in |a |study:
|What |category |identifies |your |current |income |as |an |RN?

a. | Less |than |$50,000
b. | $50,000 |to |59,999
c. | $60,000 |to |69,999
d. | $70,000 |to |80,000
e. | $80,000 |or |greater

What | level | of | measurement | is | this | income | variable? | Does | the | income | variable | follow | the
|rules |outlined |in |Figure |1-1? |Provide |a |rationale |for |your |answer.

Answer: |In |this |example, |the |income |variable |is |measured |at |the |ordinal |level. |The |income |catego-
|ries |are |exhaustive, |ranging |from |less |than |$50,000 |to |greater |than |$80,000. |The |two |open-ended




AG |1-1

,AG |1-2 Answer | Guidelines | for | Questions | to | Be | Graded


categories |ensure |that |all |salary |levels |are |covered. |The |categories |are |not |exclusive, |since |catego-|ries
|(d) |and |(e) |include |an |$80,000 |salary, |so |study |participants |making |$80,000 |might |mark |either

| (d) | or | (e) | or | both | categories, | resulting | in | erroneous | data. | Category | (e) | could | be | changed |to

|greater |than |$80,000, |making |the |categories |exclusive. |The |categories |can |be |rank |ordered |from

|the |lowest |salary |to |the |highest |salary, |which |is |consistent |with |ordinal |data |(Grove |& |Gray,

|2019; |Waltz |et |al., |2017).




5. What |level |of |measurement |is |the |CDS |score? |Provide |a |rationale |for |your |answer.
Answer: |The |CDS |score |is |at |the |interval |level |of |measurement. |The |CDS |is |a |26-item |Likert
|scale |developed |to |measure |depression |in |cardiac |patients. |Study |participants |rated |their |symp-

|toms |on |a |scale |of |1 |to |7, |with |higher |numbers |indicating |increased |severity |in |the |depression

|symptoms. |The |total |scores |for |each |subject |obtained |from |this |multi-item |scale |are |considered

|to |be |at |the |interval |level |of |measurement |(Gray |et |al., |2017; |Waltz |et |al., |2017).




6. Were |nonparametric |or |parametric |analysis |techniques |used |to |analyze |the |CDS |scores |for
|the |cardiac |patients |in |this |study? |Provide |a |rationale |for |your |answer.

Answer: |Parametric |statistics, |such |as | mean | and | SD, | were | conducted | to | describe | CDS
| scores |for |study |participants |(see |Table |1). |CDS |scores |are |interval-level |data |as |indicated |in

|Questions |5, |so |parametric |statistics |are |appropriate |for |this |level |of |data |(Gray |et |al., |2017; |Kim |&

|Mallory, |2017).




7. Is |the |prevalence |of |depression |linked |to |the |NYHA |class? |Discuss |the |clinical |importance
|of |this |result.

Answer: |The |study |narrative |indicated |that |the |prevalence |of |depression |increased |with |the
|greater |NYHA |class. |I n |NYHA |class |III, |64% |of |the |subjects |were |depressed, |whereas |11% |of |the

|subjects |were |depressed |in |NYHA |class |I. |Thus, |as |the |NYHA |class |increased, |the |number |of |sub-

|jects |with |depression |increased. |This |is |an |expected |finding |because |as |the |NYHA |class |increases,

|cardiac |patients |have |m ore |severe |physical |symptoms, |which |usually |result |in |emotional |distress,

|such | as | depression. | Nurses | need | to | actively | assess | cardiac | patients | for | depression, | especially

| those|in |higher |NYHA |classes, |so |they |might |be |diagnosed |and |treated |as |needed.




8. What |frequency |and |percent |of |cardiac |patients |in |this |study |were |not |being |treated |with
|an |antidepressant? |Show |your |calculations |and |round |your |answer |to |the |nearest |whole

|percent |(%).

Answer: |A |total | |of | |106 | |cardiac | |patients | |participated | |in | |this | |study. | |The | |sample | |included |15
|patients |who |were |receiving |an |antidepressant |(see |Table |1). |The | |number | |of | |cardiac |patients

| not | treated | for | depression | was | 91 | (106 | – | 15 | = |91). | The | group | percent | is | calculated |by

| the | following | formula: | (group | frequency | ÷ | total | sample | size) | × | 100%. | For | this

| study, |( 91 |patients |÷ |106 | sample |size) |× |100% |= |0.858 |× |100% |= |85.8% |= |86%. |The | |final

|answer | is | rounded | to | the | nearest | whole | percent | as | directed | in | the | question. | You | could

| have |also |subtracted |the |14% |of |patients |treated |with |antidepressants |from |100% |and |obtained

|the |86% | who | were | not | treated | with | an | antidepressant.




9. What |was |the |purpose |of |the |6-minute |walk |test |(6MWT)? |Would |the |6MWT |be |useful |in
|clinical |practice?

Answer: |Ha |et |al. |(2018) |stated, |“The |6-min |walk |test |(6MWT) |is |a |measure |of |the |submaximal,
|steady-state |functional |capacity” |of |cardiac |patients. |This |test |would |be |a |quick, |easy |way |to

|determine |a |cardiac |patient’s |functional |status |in |a |clinical | |setting. | |This | |functional | |status |score

| could | be | used | to | determine | the | treatment | plan | to | promote | or | maintain | functional | status |of

|cardiac |patients.

, Answer | Guidelines | for | Questions | to | Be | Graded AG |1-3


10. How |was |exercise |confidence |measured |in |this |study? |What |was |the |level |of |measurement
|for |the |exercise |confidence |variable |in |this |study? |Provide |a |rationale |for |your |answer.

|Answer: |Exercise |confidence |of |the |patients |with |heart |failure |(HF) |in |this |study |was |measured

|with |the |Exercise |Confidence |Scale |that |included |four |subscales |focused |on |walking, |climbing,

|lifting | objects | of | graded | weight, | and | running | (see | the | study | narrative). | This | was | a | rating | scale

|with |values |ranging |from |0 |to |100. |The |patients’ |scores |for |the |Total |Exercise |Confidence |scale

|and | the | subscales | were | considered | interval-level | data | and | analyzed | with | parametric | statistics,

|such |as |means |and |SDs |(see |the |study |narrative; |Waltz |et |al., |2017).
$22.99
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
excellenttestguides

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
excellenttestguides Chamberlain College Nursing
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
2
Miembro desde
4 meses
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
640
Última venta
1 mes hace
Nursing Made Simple – Excellent Test Guides

Passionate about nursing education, I provide clear, exam-focused notes, summaries, and practice questions. My resources cover pathophysiology, pharmacology, anatomy, and medical-surgical nursing—designed to simplify complex topics, save study time, and help nursing students succeed with confidence.

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes