(COMPLETE ANSWERS)
2025 - DUE 17 September 2025
For assistance contact
Email:
,This is a complex case study with several interrelated questions about family systems theory,
cybernetics, and ethical considerations for a psychologist. Let's break it down:
First-Order vs. Second-Order Change
First-Order Change
First-order change refers to changes that occur within a system, without altering the
fundamental structure or rules of that system. It's like rearranging the furniture in a room; the
room itself remains the same. These changes are often superficial and temporary, as the
underlying system continues to operate in the same way.
Example from the case study: David minimizing Jake's issues by saying "He's just being
dramatic" is a first-order change. He is trying to address Jake's behavior by dismissing its
severity, but this doesn't alter the underlying family dynamics that may be contributing to Jake's
distress. Laura intensifying her involvement by constantly checking on Jake is also a first-order
change; she is trying to fix Jake's immediate behavior without addressing the systemic patterns
that led to it.
Second-Order Change
Second-order change, on the other hand, involves a fundamental shift in the structure, rules, or
organizing principles of a system. It's like renovating the room itself – changing its layout,
function, or core characteristics. These changes are often more profound and lead to more lasting
solutions because they address the root causes of the problem.
Example from the case study: A second-order change would involve the family actively
exploring and modifying their communication patterns, emotional expression rules, and roles.
For instance, if David were to genuinely engage with Jake about his feelings, acknowledge his
distress, and shift away from his pattern of emotional withdrawal and minimization, that would
be a second-order change. Similarly, if Laura were to shift from over-functioning and trying to
"fix" Jake to empowering him to find his own solutions and allowing David to take more
responsibility for emotional connection, that would also be a second-order change.
First-Order and Second-Order Cybernetic Ethical Considerations
Psychologists working within a systems framework, particularly a cybernetic one, must be
mindful of ethical considerations at both the first and second-order levels.
First-Order Cybernetic Ethical Considerations
First-order cybernetics views the therapist as an external observer who intervenes in a system to
correct deviations from a norm or desired state. The focus is on observable behaviors and the
feedback loops that maintain them. Ethical considerations here involve:
, Objective observation: The therapist must strive for objectivity, avoiding imposing their
own values or interpretations onto the family. They observe patterns and attempt to
identify dysfunctions.
o Example: The psychologist observes David's tendency to withdraw and Laura's
tendency to over-function. They might label these as dysfunctional patterns that
need correction.
Intervention for homeostasis: The goal is to restore the system to a stable state
(homeostasis). Interventions are aimed at modifying specific behaviors that are causing
distress.
o Example: The psychologist might suggest specific communication techniques for
David and Laura to use when Jake expresses distress, aiming to reduce his
withdrawal and Laura's over-involvement.
Neutrality: The therapist maintains a neutral stance, not taking sides with any family
member.
o Example: The psychologist would avoid blaming David for his emotional
distance or Laura for her over-involvement, instead focusing on how these
patterns function within the system.
The "patient" as the identified symptom bearer: In first-order cybernetics, the
problem is often seen as residing in the individual with the symptoms (Jake). The family
is the context, but the intervention is often aimed at changing the individual's behavior
within the family.
o Example: The initial referral is for Jake's depression and withdrawal, framing
him as the "patient" who needs to change.
Second-Order Cybernetic Ethical Considerations
Second-order cybernetics views the therapist as an integral part of the system being observed
and changed. The therapist's own values, beliefs, and actions influence the system, and the
system, in turn, influences the therapist. This perspective emphasizes the co-creation of reality
and the recursive nature of interactions. Ethical considerations become more complex and
nuanced:
Therapist's Reflexivity: The therapist must be acutely aware of their own biases,
assumptions, and how their presence and interventions shape the family's process. This
involves constant self-reflection.
o Example: The psychologist must consider how their own background and
theoretical orientation might influence their understanding of the Jackson family's
dynamics (e.g., a bias towards encouraging emotional expression might clash with
David's ingrained patterns).