100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Examen

Law of Delict exam (2025) comprehensive questions and verified answers (Detailed & Elaborated) ACTUAL EXAM 2025 TEST 100% Solved 2025!!

Puntuación
-
Vendido
-
Páginas
20
Grado
A+
Subido en
21-08-2025
Escrito en
2025/2026

Law of Delict exam (2025) comprehensive questions and verified answers (Detailed & Elaborated) ACTUAL EXAM 2025 TEST 100% Solved 2025!!

Institución
Law Of Delict
Grado
Law of Delict










Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Law of Delict
Grado
Law of Delict

Información del documento

Subido en
21 de agosto de 2025
Número de páginas
20
Escrito en
2025/2026
Tipo
Examen
Contiene
Preguntas y respuestas

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

Law of Delict exam (2025) comprehensive questions
and verified answers (Detailed & Elaborated) ACTUAL
EXAM 2025 TEST 100% Solved 2025!!
Delict - (ANSWER)Wrongful conduct

The act of a person which in a wrongful and culpable way causes loss, damage to
another.



Requirements of Delict - (ANSWER)Act. Wrongfulness. Fault. Causation. Damage



Delict versus Crime - (ANSWER)Delict- protects public interest. The aggrieved
party institutes the action. Objective- claim damages as compensation. No
attempted Delict



Crime - (ANSWER)Protects public interest. State prosecutes. Punish the criminal.
Can have attempted crime.



Conduct - (ANSWER)Voluntary human commission or omission



Wrongfulness - (ANSWER)For a liability to follow an act prejudice must be caused
in a wrongful or unreasonable manner. Without wrongfulness defendant cannot
be held liable.



Liability for an omission - (ANSWER)Liability follows when the omission was in
fact wrongful, where a legal duty rested on the defendant to act positively to
prevent harm from occurring and he failed to comply with that duty.

,Fault - (ANSWER)Legally blameworthy for having acted wrongfully or did not
conform to the standard of care required by law and thus caused damage through
negligence. Fault - intention and negligence



Causal connection - (ANSWER)Between the act of the defendant and damage
suffered by the plaintiff. The act must have caused the damage or loss.



Damage - (ANSWER)The plaintiff must have suffered damage. Damage can take
two forms. Patrimonial loss - Damnum iniuria datum, that is the reduction of
financial power or injury to personality - iniuria the infringement of an aspect of
personality - good name.



Elements of Conduct - (ANSWER)Human act - even if an animal is used

Human act is present. A juristic person can act through its agents and be held
delictually liable for its actions



Gijzen - (ANSWER)Can occur without there being an act on the part of the
defendant in the case of land subsistence cases. Such an act must be wrongful. An
act and its consequences may be separated from each other, but there always has
to be an act.



Voluntary Conduct - (ANSWER)The act must be performed

Voluntarily, the wrongdoer must have had control over his muscular movements.
It does not have to be willed or desired State versus Russell.

, Commission & Omission - (ANSWER)Conduct can be in the form of Omission or
Commission. Liability for an omission is in general more restricted than liability for
a positive act.



Defense of automatism - (ANSWER)Someone acted mechanically- sleep,
unconscious, fainting, fit, absolute compulsion, if these are present a person is
incapable of controlling his bodily movement- purely mechanical action.



Sane Automatism - (ANSWER)Onus is on the plaintiff to prove that the defendant
has acted voluntarily and therefor not mechanically



Antecedent liability - (ANSWER)Reasonable man would have foreseen the
possibility of causing harm while in a state of automatism



Wrongfulness - (ANSWER)It's a dual investigation: only delictually wrongful when
it has as its consequences the factual infringement of an individual interest. An
act and its

Consequences are always separated by time and Space.



Pinchin Versus Santam Insurance - (ANSWER)Pregnant woman involved in a car
accident, caused by the defendants negligence. Child suffered brain

Damage.

Compensation was

Claimed for the child, judge there was
Gratis
Accede al documento completo:
Descarga

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor
Seller avatar
Examinor

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Examinor Teachme2-tutor
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
1292
Miembro desde
11 meses
Número de seguidores
0
Documentos
3337
Última venta
1 día hace

0.0

0 reseñas

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes